Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 2, 2016, 5:18 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

British Columbia Lottery taking bets on US election

5273 replies. Last post 5 hours ago by Kingofearth.

Page 343 of 352
3.918
PrintE-mailLink
Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
Upstate NY
United States
Member #174656
May 5, 2016
747 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 27, 2016, 10:53 pm - IP Logged

Stein's political party?  LOL!  All ten of them?  I could care less.

248,000+ in 2014

https://ballotpedia.org/Green_Party

    Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
    Upstate NY
    United States
    Member #174656
    May 5, 2016
    747 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 27, 2016, 10:56 pm - IP Logged

    Maybe if they actually find voter fraud in all three states, but I don't see that happening. Has Stein ever gave a logical reason for asking recounts other that she could?

    Some reports of ballot inaccuracies in the three states. Whether a recount will change anything has never been a reason (l;et alone the reason) for the recount.

      Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
      Upstate NY
      United States
      Member #174656
      May 5, 2016
      747 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 27, 2016, 11:00 pm - IP Logged

      She said Americans deserve to have confidence in our vote.

      I do have confidence in my vote.

      Trump won.

      Done deal.

      Would she be talking about this if Hillary won? Nooo.

      They still can't swallow the fact Trump won is right.

      That's too bad. Suck it up.

      Correct answer

      and then it derails into wrong-ville

      Clearly she would do the same if it was reversed, she ran against Hillary (and the rest of the candidates) for crying out loud.

        Kingofearth's avatar - Kinnak
        Upstate NY
        United States
        Member #174656
        May 5, 2016
        747 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 27, 2016, 11:08 pm - IP Logged

        "I am not a guy, lonely dad so stop being sexist and making assumptions."

        You still haven't put your gender on you profile so it's impossible for anyone make any gender assumption about you. It's just another excuse for you to make lame childish insults to other LP members.

        As much of a nuisance gender pronouns are, you gotta respect the requests people make.

        If she prefers the female pronouns to be used, then use it.

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7295 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 28, 2016, 12:04 am - IP Logged

          depends on how much evidence they can muster up to tie the two together. problem is...
          there is no proof that HRC had anything to do with voter fraud. if she was going to rig
          the election to win. she would have bought off the electorial votes. not the popular vote.

          any investigation/trial would be a complete waste of time, and tax payers
          money. just like Ken Star and whitewater.

          in any case, even if Trump was to actually prosecute her. do you honestly
          believe that they would put a person of her stature in general population?
          I don't believe so...
          just say. IMHO.

          "problem is... there is no proof that HRC had anything to do with voter fraud. if she was going to rig the election to win. she would have bought off the electorial votes. not the popular vote."

          From what I read Clinton's people knew why they lost and that's why they didn't ask for recounts.

          "in any case, even if Trump was to actually prosecute her."

          If Trump has evidence that nobody else has, he should have turned it in a long time ago. Who was the last President that prosecuted anyone?

            dr65's avatar - black panther.jpg
            Pennsylvania
            United States
            Member #74096
            May 2, 2009
            22834 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 28, 2016, 12:24 am - IP Logged

            Correct answer

            and then it derails into wrong-ville

            Clearly she would do the same if it was reversed, she ran against Hillary (and the rest of the candidates) for crying out loud.

            She would not do the same if Hillary won.

            With Clinton on board for the recount, it should show that if you give someone an inch, they take a mile.

            She conceded.

            There is a little matter of the electoral counts for those states being voided if the hand recount is not done
            by December 13th. Counting by hand will most definitely go beyond that date. Is this the idea behind the madness?

            When Trump suggested rigging, most everyone laughed at him. Isn't this fiasco something to be laughed at too?
            I think it is. Raising the question of whether or not the election results are legitimate is something that was viewed
            as horrible and Hillary herself was shocked that Trump would suggest such a thing...yet here now, she is doing the
            same thing..on board with Stein to recount at the cost of millions of dollars vote results she said she would accept.

            Get this lady out of the way, she's becoming very old right now..the morning after when she couldn't take the stage
            for whatever reason and had Podesta come out and speak for her was a joke. This move is an even bigger one. Stein
            moved on this 45 minutes before the deadline I read. She's planning on making states miss their deadlines for certification
            of votes...

            So what is her MAIN reason for the petition? Where is she on the list of Clinton special interests?

            The Democrats are making 2016 a year to remember...hopefully people will remember this in 2020. What a joke.

              dr65's avatar - black panther.jpg
              Pennsylvania
              United States
              Member #74096
              May 2, 2009
              22834 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 28, 2016, 12:31 am - IP Logged

              Here's the dirty stinking democrat strategy...  "The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.  If all three states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270".

              http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_democrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html

              Don't they realize what they're doing makes them look really bad? It's almost 3 weeks later and Hillary is on the
              losing team again.

              What do they expect will be different? Hillary gets 7% more votes...LOL...lock her up.

              Trump relaxed on that idea, I hope he goes at it full swing now...she's a poor sport. I wouldn't dare show
              my face and participate in this silly demand for a recount. They looked bad when they lost..now they just
              look like a bigger bunch of poor sports.

                JAMORA's avatar - ladyclover
                NC
                United States
                Member #164399
                February 28, 2015
                1923 Posts
                Online
                Posted: November 28, 2016, 12:43 am - IP Logged

                She would not do the same if Hillary won.

                With Clinton on board for the recount, it should show that if you give someone an inch, they take a mile.

                She conceded.

                There is a little matter of the electoral counts for those states being voided if the hand recount is not done
                by December 13th. Counting by hand will most definitely go beyond that date. Is this the idea behind the madness?

                When Trump suggested rigging, most everyone laughed at him. Isn't this fiasco something to be laughed at too?
                I think it is. Raising the question of whether or not the election results are legitimate is something that was viewed
                as horrible and Hillary herself was shocked that Trump would suggest such a thing...yet here now, she is doing the
                same thing..on board with Stein to recount at the cost of millions of dollars vote results she said she would accept.

                Get this lady out of the way, she's becoming very old right now..the morning after when she couldn't take the stage
                for whatever reason and had Podesta come out and speak for her was a joke. This move is an even bigger one. Stein
                moved on this 45 minutes before the deadline I read. She's planning on making states miss their deadlines for certification
                of votes...

                So what is her MAIN reason for the petition? Where is she on the list of Clinton special interests?

                The Democrats are making 2016 a year to remember...hopefully people will remember this in 2020. What a joke.

                I know that I for one, who was not a staunch supporter of any party prior to this election, will not take the democrat party seriously for some to come, if ever...I won't forget the attempt to shove Hillary down the USA's throat, regardless of her ineligibility due to mishandling classified information and pay for play with the SOS position....the paid for protests, and hypocrisy after the election.

                Maybe that's why the symbols adopted by the parties are the elephant and the ass...lol...

                "Don't waste time, it's the stuff life's made of..."

                  Avatar
                  Kentucky
                  United States
                  Member #32652
                  February 14, 2006
                  7295 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 28, 2016, 1:09 am - IP Logged

                  Some reports of ballot inaccuracies in the three states. Whether a recount will change anything has never been a reason (l;et alone the reason) for the recount.

                  The point is Clinton didn't ask for a recount so it's odd Stein would knowing it can't possibly benefit her or the Green Party.

                    Avatar
                    Kentucky
                    United States
                    Member #32652
                    February 14, 2006
                    7295 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 28, 2016, 1:31 am - IP Logged

                    As much of a nuisance gender pronouns are, you gotta respect the requests people make.

                    If she prefers the female pronouns to be used, then use it.

                    If their gender identity is so important to them that they call other LP members "sexist" for getting it wrong, shouldn't they at least put it on their profile?

                    And what is the relevance of one's gender in a lottery discussion or a political discussion?

                      Avatar
                      Kentucky
                      United States
                      Member #32652
                      February 14, 2006
                      7295 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 28, 2016, 2:19 am - IP Logged

                      She would not do the same if Hillary won.

                      With Clinton on board for the recount, it should show that if you give someone an inch, they take a mile.

                      She conceded.

                      There is a little matter of the electoral counts for those states being voided if the hand recount is not done
                      by December 13th. Counting by hand will most definitely go beyond that date. Is this the idea behind the madness?

                      When Trump suggested rigging, most everyone laughed at him. Isn't this fiasco something to be laughed at too?
                      I think it is. Raising the question of whether or not the election results are legitimate is something that was viewed
                      as horrible and Hillary herself was shocked that Trump would suggest such a thing...yet here now, she is doing the
                      same thing..on board with Stein to recount at the cost of millions of dollars vote results she said she would accept.

                      Get this lady out of the way, she's becoming very old right now..the morning after when she couldn't take the stage
                      for whatever reason and had Podesta come out and speak for her was a joke. This move is an even bigger one. Stein
                      moved on this 45 minutes before the deadline I read. She's planning on making states miss their deadlines for certification
                      of votes...

                      So what is her MAIN reason for the petition? Where is she on the list of Clinton special interests?

                      The Democrats are making 2016 a year to remember...hopefully people will remember this in 2020. What a joke.

                      "With Clinton on board for the recount, it should show that if you give someone an inch, they take a mile."

                      Hillary for American general counsel Marc Elias gave a different reason for participating in the recount.

                      "Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides. "

                      "When Trump suggested rigging, most everyone laughed at him."

                      Just the fact Trump did suggest there could be rigging is even more reason why Clinton's attorneys are monitoring Stein's recount. Don't you know Trump will have people monitoring the recount too?

                      "yet here now, she is doing the same thing..on board with Stein to recount at the cost of millions of dollars vote results she said she would accept."

                      Stein has legal right to ask for a recount, raised the funds to do it, and both Clinton and Trump have a legal right to monitor it. The election is over, the recount will change nothing so why are you still reading and believing what's on the fact less anti-Clinton blogs?

                      "The Democrats are making 2016 a year to remember...hopefully people will remember this in 2020."

                      You must have missed the Civics class that explained every House member and 1/3 of the Senate is elected every two years. Hopefully for the Republican majority, people will forget Trump's campaign promises in 2018.

                        LottoAce's avatar - WWI Flying_Ace.gif
                        N.C.
                        United States
                        Member #56005
                        October 28, 2007
                        804 Posts
                        Online
                        Posted: November 28, 2016, 8:50 am - IP Logged

                        "problem is... there is no proof that HRC had anything to do with voter fraud. if she was going to rig the election to win. she would have bought off the electorial votes. not the popular vote."

                        From what I read Clinton's people knew why they lost and that's why they didn't ask for recounts.

                        "in any case, even if Trump was to actually prosecute her."

                        If Trump has evidence that nobody else has, he should have turned it in a long time ago. Who was the last President that prosecuted anyone?

                        exactly...

                        "know your limitations, but excede your expectations"

                          dr65's avatar - black panther.jpg
                          Pennsylvania
                          United States
                          Member #74096
                          May 2, 2009
                          22834 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 28, 2016, 10:13 am - IP Logged

                          Kooky Stein first said she needed a million and now she's up to 7 million? Disclaimer in donation ad...it may not
                          change anything, but give anyway.

                          Crazy

                            LiveInGreenBay's avatar - driver
                            Green Bay
                            United States
                            Member #169391
                            October 15, 2015
                            1237 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 28, 2016, 2:35 pm - IP Logged

                            Sure looks like another terrorist attack at Ohio State.  Just another reason for people to support Trumps immigration policy and reject the democrat policies.

                            Never give up.  Banana

                              DEE88's avatar - animal doggy2.jpg
                              PA
                              United States
                              Member #69849
                              January 18, 2009
                              14832 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 28, 2016, 2:42 pm - IP Logged

                              Sure looks like another terrorist attack at Ohio State.  Just another reason for people to support Trumps immigration policy and reject the democrat policies.

                                 They just said it was an 18 year old Somali that did the killings...   WOW!!!  when does it end...

                                     2079    1085   8841    7227   3305   4651

                                 
                                Page 343 of 352