Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 4:44 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Computerized lotto must wait awhile

Tennessee LotteryTennessee Lottery: Computerized lotto must wait awhile

Scratch-off would be only game for months

Tennesseans would be left to play a scratch-off lottery game for months before they get a chance to play computerized games such as lotto, under plans discussed by the Tennessee Education Lottery Corp. board yesterday.

And your favorite spot to buy those lotto tickets might not get to sell them if the store doesn't sell enough scratch-offs while the computerized ticket-sales system is being installed statewide.

The board discussed options but took no vote. Online games, those whose tickets are printed by an in-store computer at the time of purchase, usually have much bigger jackpots. It would take the state months to install this equipment and train ticket sellers on how to use it.

Meanwhile, Denny Bottorff, chairman of the Lottery Board, said any joint venture with Georgia's lottery could fall apart if Georgia officials refuse to give guarantees or pay penalties for missing a Dec. 2 deadline.

''The board may say, 'We want a contract in which you have something at risk if you don't deliver.' It could come apart on things like that,'' he said.

The board is scheduled to announce its decision whether to hook up with Georgia a week from today but still has to determine whether such a partnership is legal and whether it makes sense, Bottorff said yesterday.

The former Nashville banker said an opinion by state Attorney General Paul Summers that the alliance would be legal under the state legislation creating Tennessee's games does not necessarily mean Tennessee would join Georgia.

''If the lawyers say we do not have authority to enter into a contract with Georgia, then we move on,'' he said, referring to private lawyers the board has working on the question.

Georgia has said it can get the Volunteer State games going earlier late this year instead of March next year.

Partnership idea criticized

Bottorff also responded to a statement by state Sen. Bill Clabough, R-Maryville, who criticized the proposed partnership.

''It would be unfortunate if the new Lottery Board chooses to ignore what seems to me to be the General Assembly's clear legislative intent that all major contracts need to be publicly and competitively bid and awarded,'' Clabough said.

The law creating the lottery, passed earlier this year, provides that all contracts of more than $75,000 for lottery products and services must be competitively bid.

Bottorff said Clabough's remarks were ''one person's interpretation'' of the law.

''One thing we are looking at under the legislation is whether or not we have the authority to be able to contract with Georgia and, in so doing, fulfill our obligations for procurement. This is the first time anything like this has gone on in the United States,'' Bottorff said.

''What the board needs to do is hear from its counsel, which includes the attorney general and also all the lawyers that we have on this aspect.

''Does this statute allow this board to go forward and enter into a deal with Georgia? They will take into consideration when they issue the opinion of legislative intent.''

Two categories of games

The Lottery Board took no vote on a proposal that would require sellers of lottery tickets to sell some specified number of instant lottery tickets before they would be eligible to sell tickets for online games.

Lottery games fall into two broad categories: online and instant.

With an online system, a player makes his picks on a terminal connected to the lottery databank and finds out when the winning numbers are drawn if he or she has won anything. Pull-tab and scratch-off games tell you if you are an instant winner.

Janet Kleinfelter of the state attorney general's office said it would be several months before online games were available.

''It is an expensive proposition when you place a terminal in somebody's store,'' she said.

''If their instant sales are minimal, then the issue becomes do you want to make that capital investment in a store that only has minimal ticket sales when that terminal might be better utilized elsewhere.''

Bottorff said different states had different thresholds that lottery ticket sellers must meet to have terminals for online games. He added that he did not know what the standards here might be.

Sales inquiries pour in

The board also discussed but took no vote on application fees that convenience markets and other lottery ticket outlets will have to pay, but it appeared there would be separate fees for instant ticket and online licenses.

Lottery spokesman Will Pinkston said the board had received 1,700 inquiries from potential ticket sellers and that 300-400 were coming in each day.

The law requires criminal background checks on practically everyone with any connection to the lottery, including people who own or work in establishments that sell tickets.

Kleinfelter told the board that she had talked with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation to try to determine the cheapest and quickest way to make such checks and that appeared to be for employees of the lottery organization to make the checks themselves.

Under this arrangement, the TBI would run a dedicated, secure telephone line from its computer to the lottery headquarters, and designated members of the lottery staff would be trained on how to access TBI's criminal records database.

Tennessean

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 13 years ago by vincejr.
Page 1 of 1

United States
Member #379
June 5, 2002
11296 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 30, 2003, 8:16 am - IP Logged

I like the idea of scratch-only at first; the lowest grossing in terms of instants should be weeded out when terminals are phased in.

    vincejr's avatar - wallace
    Somewhere in VA
    United States
    Member #1944
    July 29, 2003
    130 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: September 1, 2003, 5:43 pm - IP Logged

    Two comments on the article...

    1) While phasing in the online games is a good idea (so you can work out the kinks in the system), limiting online terminals to retailers who sell a specified dollar amount of tickets per period of time is a VERY BAD idea. Geography has to play a part in it too...you don't want players to have to drive 50 miles to buy a ticket because there are no "qualified" retailers in their area.

    A much better plan to follow is the one that Virginia follows. Any reatiler who wants to sell online tickets and can meet the licensing requirements and pay the appropriate fees is allowed to sell online tickets. HOWEVER...a minimum weekly sales amount of $600 per terminal is required or the retailer pays extra fees (on a sliding scale) to cover the extra costs that the lottery incurs by having the "underproductive" terminal in theri store.

    and...2) did the article characterize the TN lottery law correctly in that "The law requires criminal background checks on practically everyone with any connection to the lottery, including people who own or work in establishments that sell tickets. " They have got to be crazy...own a lottery retailer, I can see, but if the article is correct then every time a 7-11, Quik Trip, or other convenience store that sells tickets wants to hire a new employee, they would have to submit the employee for a criminal records check? With the turnover at those stores? TN will be bankrupt in six months!!!