Search

Eliminators - The workup hit men.Reply
Kola, I said Lottery Players, not Lottery. Nature is not immune to those odds and yet has functioned with 'precision' for millions of years despite what the ODDS would suggest. This is the core of your false narrative. Nature has been, and still is, functioning 'precisely' as the ODDS suggest. People here have paid upwards of $300 for useless software because they believe it gives them a better chance to become rich than those who don't buy the software. I'm sure these pe
Mar 18, 2013, 11:47 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

All The BrainsReply
RJOH: No way of knowing Pumpi's intentions in his postings, but he provides something LP sorely lacks on most forums: A chuckle, smile, or even sometimes a puzzled frown. Nobody much smiles back, which probably says more about the people who respond to him than it says about Pumpi. As for demands for proof of claims, you're calling something that almost doesn't happen on any of these forums [except Math] a general condition. It's true on the Math Forum a few posters have made a fetish, a lita
May 28, 2011, 6:05 pm - JosephusMinimus - Lottery Systems Forum

Re: Pick 3 +/ - workouts
I'm sure there's been more but within the last month or so there have ben +/- workouts with 312, 666, and 444. It's fun doing paper and pencil workouts and using the various systems mentioned here, but I wonder just what if everyone, or maybe some people have a number that works for them. Maybe someone can use 312 for instance, and have good results with it, but for others it wouldn't work. There are lots of states and thus lorts of games, and if anyone wanted to back test they co
Nov 17, 2008, 1:53 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Systems Forum

Capitalizing on Repeat Vtrac Header #sReply
hey now 4thquarterbabe, nah, i ain't sayin' who u is, i rememba' u. thank u very much for such a warm welcome and perception of me ;-) now Maloney, i know u ain't state specific but i gotta go here, on account of i c folk b askin' that big question about my state here's a tip! just an XAMPLE!! let's say ur hot trac atb (across the board) is a vtrac form of 235 lets say that trac is due to land midday between the 10th - 12th, look at LD's vtrac-calendar in the mystical forum, c
Dec 8, 2007, 11:24 pm - ducksafloat - Lottery Systems Forum

Lotto 5 and 6 picksReply
Hey Codmander! I agree! The forum Lottery Post is a place to get some good lottery discussion and learn different systems, approaches, thinking, etc.. The QP discussion is beat , we all know that the only way to win is by quick picks, OK, we get it. The people that come here to argue that QP's are the end all, need to find a forum called the QUICKPICK POST, where the people play Quick Picks. The discussions would be like, How did you pick your quick pick? or What time did you pick your
Apr 11, 2007, 7:12 pm - jarasan - Lottery Systems Forum

No delusion-100% winning methodReply
And Paurths, I neglected to say that my method (technique-system-piece of junk-whatever you want to call it does not add or take away) and its rules did not change. I don't know what you expected. I gave a process that I thought would help. And has helped me tremendously, and will help me even more as I continue to abstract more and more from it. The rules did not change. They are still intact. But they are so straightforward that to call it rules seems, for now, inflexible, as least for now.
May 23, 2006, 2:46 pm - Kola - Lottery Systems Forum

Psychic predictions (I am getting resultsReply
Visiondude:Is God unhappy with us expanding our minds. Would he be happier if we believed the world was flat, and that the sun revolved around the earth. If we were meant to be so in the dark then why were we created in gods image .If you can find the site that the story originated, you will find comments from likeminded people as yourself. I knew when I posted the story that religious zealots would crawl out of the woodwork, but the story was not mine to edit. I am sorry to tell you that
Jul 18, 2004, 9:21 am - KWHILBORN - Lottery Systems Forum

New Systems Forum just based on real stats and facts!Reply
Hi all It seems to me that the problem here is not having a clear definition of the word system. Maybe a Winning system forum would be nice but I expect it would be a very quick read. Even if a winning system was developed it would have a very short lifespan as counter measures would be launched to destroy it's effectiveness. Every Lottery system I have ever seen requires the user to make decisions at some point. If the user does not have to make decisions then the system would be be
Sep 3, 2014, 6:57 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Systems Forum

pick 3 table
I will use GA p 3 for this example. Draw. Sum. 2 7 minus sum. Width. Root 681. 15 12 7. 6 316. 10. 17. 5. 1 125. 8. 19 4. 8 869. 23. 4. 3. 5 061. 7. 20. 6. 7 334. 10. 17 1. 1 625. 13. 14. 4. 4 867. 21. 6. 2. 3 913. 13. 14. 8. 4 Take a long look at the data. Notice how the width and root become the sum 23. The width times the root 4 times 4 gives the pair 16 in the 016 draw.the sum 14 minus 8 gives a due sum of 8. Alas the 125 draw. This is like a look ahead
Aug 7, 2014, 9:01 pm - lakerben - Lottery Systems Forum

My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lotteryReply
GiveFive, I guess I've become a persona non grata in this thread. At the risk of being struck by lightning, I would like to make another comment. A lot of what is being posted here as a result of the blow-up I seemed to have precipitated is quite factual. Some of it is questionable logically, and some of it is no more than folksy philosophy. However, I'm not here now to address those issues. For the sake of discussion, let's forget about the mathematics of probability for now. It's true that
Jul 28, 2010, 1:49 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum