Search

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
Hello, greenfox, do not worry about disturbing others, the forum was created For this reason, you know that exercise the mind a bit of a day prevents evil parkinton, because many minds are better because MEMBERS have as much experience, you can see the number of post, the study of patterns is good, then the I type this in or not this pattern, TEMSO that predict patterns (small segments horizontal and vertical) as there are patterns that repeat and other late comforme The number of draws an
Mar 5, 2013, 12:21 pm - dr san - Mathematics Forum

Are you good at Algebra?Reply
mathh hello, very good job!! in your previous post, then a number in the draw, he will cycle high (greater delay leaving) cycles and low (less delay exiting) the final space (f), is the last test that came out for the last test drawn, because there seems to be the study of the behavior of a lottery number, that there is a relationship between mathematics and physics, which determines a logical reason for a number out, we need to make clear statistics of each number, to qualify. Mathh, you may
Aug 23, 2012, 4:54 pm - dr san - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
JKING I don't think a math can solve random but that does not mean it can't be done. Most every attempt I have ever seen is based on statistics and the study of past drawings which for the most part is fruitless. We should be looking at the inner workings of random it's self. Since the lottery draw is a closed system and the order in which the numbers are drawn is what we are looking for we need to focus on that aspect which is the random part of the draw. The numbers are not the
Jul 27, 2011, 4:51 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
It seems that you and RJOh are basically saying you don't believe there is anything to be gained from applying backtest or simulation techniques to proposed lottery selection systems. Since you've declared often that the stats published by the lotteries for each game only tell you what you already know, that they will pay back 50% of the gross over the long haul, you seem to have given up any hope of determining in advance what your chances of succeeding with a system are. Before giving up, I
May 7, 2011, 12:08 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Excel? How often do the bottom 5 short sums produce hits?Reply
Very nice research. I meant to give it 5 stars but fat fingered the mouse. Still trying to take it all in and would welcome any further conclusions. I am at a loss on what 2.7 represents, but don t doubt it. SS s are something I wanted to explore more and it is good to see this study. Thank you all. DD
Mar 27, 2011, 6:14 am - Delta Draw - Mathematics Forum

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbersReply
Thank you for your generous offer...PM on the way. I think with this post I am getting a clearer picture of what you have attempted to explain. I'll have to study it, in depth. Are you, in essence, explaining a bell curve? Taking and using digits/numbers which occur most frequently? Leaving out the digits/numbers in the tails which do not come up as often? Or am I way off track again?
Feb 4, 2011, 6:21 am - truecritic - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
Most people here are aware that counting cards in Blackjack is a skill that can be learned. Metaphorically speaking, they should also know that Lottery players must deal with a newly shuffled deck after each hand. Your evasive discussion of Blackjack is what in Western PA we call, A Lot of Baloney! Do you have any thoughts on the study quoted above? The ABSTRACT touches very closely on where your thinking is going awry. I hope you will read it again. We can get to the question of What Doe
Feb 3, 2011, 3:32 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
jwhou, When you say, two tickets with exactly the same numbers have half the chance of two tickets with different numbers, two tickets that share three numbers have one less chance at a three number win, you're forgetting that when these tickets do win, the holders are rewarded with multiple payoffs. Regardless, this doesn't detract from their observation of the effects of the Illusion of Control. And I don't think this was an issue in the study. --Jimmy4164
Jan 31, 2011, 12:26 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
However the study presumed that the quick pick tickets have actually the same probability as the same number of tickets chosen by the player and that is not entirely true. Because the quick pick, chooses the number randomly (or as near to random as a computer can be), there is a small but finite probability that multiple quickpicks would be the same numbers or share some of the same numbers, two tickets with exactly the same numbers have half the chance of two tickets with different numbers, two
Jan 30, 2011, 11:58 pm - jwhou - Mathematics Forum

Paradoxical DiceReply
I understand that it's not about a real dice game, but my point was that the die which was the opposing picks retained prior to the elevation of the data dealing with variance, was the one that the probability component devised, and not the additional sets which can be determined by the factors preceding the nontransitive dice, but not to be confused with the magic square properties written about earlier when the proposal was made to triumph in 10 games or less. In other words ,beating the se
Sep 4, 2010, 10:46 am - joker17 - Mathematics Forum