Search

There is no Math when it come to winning.Reply
I'd be interested in knowing if you had any set system matching 18 times. This lottery math and the systems is new to me. I know it takes study of history, and math to make some type of deduction. I've seen numbers so close that I find it hard to believe those white balls don't have some type of something programed to a mathematical system.
Jun 24, 2009, 11:20 pm - swampfox - Mathematics Forum

Predicting number patterns?Reply
Thank you! Thank you!! It works. I have a table of 46 rows each with columns A to U. I just need to study your code and change it to work with those rows and columns. Also will input 5 numbers. Use GWBASIC quite a lot. So I understand the logic. It's just learning the language.
Apr 14, 2009, 6:31 pm - turtle0747 - Mathematics Forum

Where did you learn coding?Reply
I can now add C++ to my arsenal programming skills. After a few weeks of self study, I think I'm getting it. I've been working with a variety of documentation, but the best one I've found so far is SAMS Teach Yourself C++ in 21 Days, 5th edition, Jesse Liberty, Bradley Jones.
Mar 12, 2008, 7:31 am - JADELottery - Mathematics Forum

Random Skew Vs BiasReply
Random numbers are numbers generated by a process, whose outcome is unpredictable, and which cannot be reliably reproduced. That being said, according to : https://www.lotterypost.com/news/102721.htm some statisticians did a study of the UK lottery and concluded it was bias but they didn't indicate how the information could help the average lottery players win a jackpot.
Jul 16, 2006, 4:09 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

what does a prediction formula look like?Reply
hareless,Before a system or algorithm can evolve, it has to exist, that's the reason I test and try to improve what I already have. I have no idea how to create algorithm that would evolve on its own, I'll leave that to the people who study AI.
Jan 17, 2006, 5:33 am - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Quantum PhysicsReply
Maybe we aren't righteous enough in this righteous universe to pick the righteous lottery numbers. We are going to have to study the numbers more righteously.RJOhI wouldn't be reading, posting, studying the numbers if I din't believe that's true. Probably, you, also. I just happen to harbor more doubts that it can be done than you probably do. I'm not all that righteous.Jack
Mar 12, 2005, 2:53 pm - Rip Snorter - Mathematics Forum

Testing wheel 9,6,5,5Reply
Hi, Apapogeas, please read the next article of Ion Saliu http://www.saliu.com/bbs/messages/772.html In the article Saliu used the lexicographic analysis to study the wrwheel (49,6,3,6)=163, and also a wheel index that offers symmetry, to test the performance of both wheels..Regards
Dec 31, 2004, 4:27 pm - Hyperdimension - Mathematics Forum

Bell CurveReply
Thank you, Sedertree. Your information is enlightening and would have saved me from many losses years ago. I will study it and apply strategies as wisely as possible. Thanks.
Dec 20, 2004, 3:53 pm - Texasman - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
Maybe the abstract to the study will ring some bells! (If you see something here in the abstract or above in the excerpt that strikes you as even remotely connected to the kinds of thought processes you engage in to design or critique a number selection system, it might be a starting point for a question. I would hope it at least prompts you to click on the link above and READ more of the study.) ABSTRACT Ecologists working in conservation and resource management are discovering the imp
Feb 3, 2011, 2:00 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
RJOh, You said, What discussion? Good question. Since my opening post, all that's been posted here are inane remarks, and that includes yours. The attacks on the 1975 study as out of date don't even confirm that the article was read, since it was merely a reference that was mentioned in the paragraph I included as an excerpt. If you aren't careful, it won't be long before the slowest people here figure out what your real purpose is in these Forums. --Jimmy4164 P.S. No need to bot
Feb 1, 2011, 12:11 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum