Search

Quantum PhysicsReply
We need some quantum physics implemented in the predictions software. In addition we probably need PC hardware(working together with the prediction software) which is able to peek into the future. The only problem I can see with that is that the balls in lottery drawings appear to perform somewhat to electrons described in a theorem known as Bell's Inequality. Einstein's fixed universe, full of rules and patterns everything has to obey at every level from sub-atomic upward, was conclusively di
Mar 12, 2005, 9:15 am - Rip Snorter - Mathematics Forum

Are you smarter than a finance major?Reply
Either the Economist or the WSJ did a writeup of this some years back. It's an interesting experiment. I wonder what the results would have been if the participants were drawn from different occupations or areas of study. Also if some people get unlucky and their computer flips heads only 55% of the time instead of 60%, then even with theoretically optimal play they will not end up with much at the end.
Aug 12, 2022, 8:13 pm - db101 - Mathematics Forum

The new Math is called Transparent Math that beats all events.Reply
Hello, in the lottery, only manages to get the forecast with math up from 75% to 80%, 25% and 20% will always be a random factor, ie if you can do math with the pot, the lid will always lack, to be irrational numbers at most any guard position probabilities, but never 100%, maximum 80%, as is the law of pareto.80 / 20. so why would you not play pro proportion of study equivalent statistics. Example = 120 was studied in past raffles past patterns, we have to play the same bets in a row at least 1
Nov 13, 2014, 5:57 am - dr san - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Study mathematics and you don't have to ask me! Maybe read a good book written by Nassim Taleb instead of publicity for Steve Player and Gail Howard. There are a few nice books treating risks and probability. Subscribe to a distant course, keep yourself busy.
Aug 9, 2013, 3:07 pm - SergeM - Mathematics Forum

Wave Frequencies / Intervals RandomishReply
this this looks WOW! I'm going to study this a little and get a better understanding. Thanks for sharing.
Mar 25, 2013, 8:43 am - SkyLine69 - Mathematics Forum

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
Thanks GF. I will study this a little more and see what I can pick up. Have you followed specific rows and columns for a pattern? Example: AD70 = 7 Y68 = 1 Z85 = 7 and run them with other days? Thats what I am comparing now to see if there is a pattern
Mar 14, 2013, 9:34 pm - SkyLine69 - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
Hello lootoboner, fantasy 5 california test = 6823 = 15 24 27 29 31 5 digit number the first 1_2_2_2_ leatorio 30-39 gave 31 1,2,2,2 Lottoboner these are within the 37 groups because it is 100% Sure miss the last digit, 5,4,7,9 5th number is random, does not enter the study In Example 31, the biggest problem is termina aoes, but always one or two repeats Endings of the previous test. then we have the 37 groups of 27 or 31 to 39 The accuracy is 100%, but only four endings that you can use like a
Jul 13, 2012, 6:59 pm - dr san - Mathematics Forum

Best Mahematics Course for Successful Lotto Predictions?Reply
I guess the general consenus is Probabliity and Statisics is where it's at when considered for useful application of the lottery process. Only reasons I asked this was I am taking Calculas I and/or Elem. Stats this fall in college, and was wondering if any advanced study of Math would do me any good for my Lottery hobby. Thanks for replies.
Jun 13, 2011, 6:45 pm - Jomacinrow - Mathematics Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
P.S. What is your goal posting in this thread? Did you forget you asked What are the Merits of Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems? I flipped a coin between I think it would be a waste of time. and discard vote just on a slim chance you would actually follow through on something you started. Read this, read that, study this, study that isn't discussion, but that's exactly how you answered when I asked the merits of whatever it is you are trying to prove or disprove. You starte
May 7, 2011, 10:06 pm - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

Do Not Need Mathematics to TrackReply
There are facts that go beyond simple math. If you look at what plays and study them long enough you will see all the facts you need to track numbers. 4 Numbers vs 7 Rows of numbers? Does that tell you anything? Look beyond the trees deep into the forest and you will find the hidden treasure .
Aug 6, 2010, 1:36 pm - Clipper - Mathematics Forum