Search

21 CombinationsReply
Take a (quick pick) lucky dip scenario. Camelot dont know how many people will play the lucky dip on any any one day...they can only estimate based on previous draws. If software is used to generate lucky dip numbers then what's to stop the software from generating 100+ potential jackpot winners or millions of 10 winners? Probability says it can happen but it has never happened on any lottery. So there has to be some mechanism to control what numbers sets are generated and how many set
Apr 1, 2009, 3:45 am - Newb - Mathematics Forum

Quick Picks can't match the power of Self PicksReply
I guess there is a presumption that everything is a debate on this forum. JX says: But anyone can post 100 combinations and get lucky once in a while. Wow. You are right. But if you look and examine more closely though, for eg. at Jackpots/MADDOGS challenges' statistics maintained by FJA, one will find that the challenges track and contain prediction results data for more than a year. You will find that some predictors don't just get lucky once in while, they get lucky regularl
Dec 5, 2007, 8:57 pm - jarasan - Mathematics Forum

Preferred lottery prediction methodsReply
And just think.... The people who actually WIN the powerball jackpots either play quick pick or lucky numbers......
Jan 10, 2006, 12:18 am - rundown99 - Mathematics Forum

The Numeric World OrderReply
Tx pick 3 was 494 + 17 659 + 20 since it is a Whole day. you multiply the pick 3. 494x659= 325546 but you always ADD the lucky +. 17+20=37 (save that for later u will need this) then you do like this. 325546-122012=313345 THEN subtract the NEW date 122112=191233 .. go back to the pick 3 then add them.. 494+659=1153... because it is a NEW day. then u divide 191233(divide)1153=165.8568951x3=497.5706852(divide by that special lucky +)37=013.44785636 NOW to break them down
Dec 20, 2012, 9:23 pm - GamBlur-TTF - Mathematics Forum

The Numeric World OrderReply
Tx pick 3 was 494 + 17 659 + 20 since it is a Whole day. you multiply the pick 3. 494x659= 325546 but you always ADD the lucky +. 17+20=37 (save that for later u will need this) then you do like this. 325546-122012=313345 THEN subtract the NEW date 122112=191233 .. go back to the pick 3 then add them.. 494+659=1153... because it is a NEW day. then u divide 191233(divide)1153=165.8568951x3=497.5706852(divide by that special lucky +)37=013.44785636 NOW to break them down
Dec 20, 2012, 9:22 pm - GamBlur-TTF - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
Hi I use a math system based on the fact you can win any bet providing all the odds are covered; example in a 10 horse race bet on all 10 the profit however depends on the odds of the winning horse but the bet is won without being lucky! In a 6 to 49 lottery [U.K] the odds are 14m/1 so the formula would be 14m planned entries x 1 game/14m = 1 win or the odds of a bet x games/odds = wins made without being lucky. However the odds for winning with 3-numbers is 57/1 so 57 planned entries x 1
Aug 6, 2015, 5:45 am - digger3939 - Mathematics Forum

21 CombinationsReply
Hi Newb This is a fair point but try this next time! If you have 5 lines ticket (your own selections) and after you bought your ticket then ask for one lucky dip then you'll find some of your numbers in lucky dip again which raise a question, does the machine know that your numbers are already a loser? I think it is irrelevant how the machines are generating the numbers for lucky dip because the actual calculation does not start half an hour after the deadline! My question is why they n
Apr 1, 2009, 6:49 am - Moses - Mathematics Forum

The Numeric World OrderReply
When you say Lucky Sum are you just referring to the Sum ? as in the Lucky Sum of 048 would be 12 ?? Thanks Carlig
Dec 20, 2012, 10:28 pm - CarliG - Mathematics Forum

Mersenne prime number guideReply
I don't know where you are getting your info from, or maybe I'm just misunderstanding what you are saying. You said that 139 fell only 2 times in 2005? Here is what I show:Tue, Oct 25, 2005 British Columbia Daily 3 1-3-9Wed, Oct 19, 2005 Pennsylvania Daily Number 1-3-9Sun, Sep 25, 2005 Washington Daily 1-3-9Fri, Sep 9, 2005 Quebec La Quotidienne 3 1-3-9Sat, Aug 13, 2005 Nebraska Pick 3 1-3-9Sat, Apr 9, 2005 Louisiana Pick 3 1-3-9Sat, Mar 19, 2005 Ohio Pick 3 1-3-9Sun, Jan 30, 2005 British Colu
Jan 7, 2006, 9:12 am - CalifDude - Mathematics Forum

Number 3Reply
Many posts are becoming nothing more than the strange fascination people have with trivial facts and numbers. They keep the forum moving with something to read but often are not posted in the proper forum. There are several key points in this post. 1. We can add 1 + 2 and arrive at 3. We can't arrive at 67 by adding 51 + 63. 2. Somebody, somewhere wrote a book calling these lucky numbers. We know this because this is quoted from the book. 3. The guy who wrote the book did not play
Sep 15, 2014, 5:32 pm - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum