Search

Determinism vs Randomness and ChanceReply
Rl rondonic Hello, I have one question, have lotteries that use 50 balls All together, the draw! and have lotteries that uses two digits separated globes These two forms have the same precision? of digits in your system if those who organize The game is a draw with the balls all together and the next draw with two other Globe Separately, does that change anything? For we know that repetition is the key event Of probability, and that lottery games can only provide up to 70% to 80%
Feb 25, 2011, 3:17 pm - dr san - Mathematics Forum

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbersReply
TO: Jimmy4164 CC: RJOH, Stack47 RE: Quick Review of OP's Question For any ball drawn, isn't the probability of it being even or odd the same? Is this tendency explained by the small probablility increase that the next ball will be odd if the previous balls drawn are even? Jimmy, these are the two questions posed for discussion in (this) stef's thread. You have missed that point. Now you might convince someone you have proven a correlation between reality and adverse co
Jan 7, 2011, 1:15 pm - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Book :The Jungles of Randomness. A Mathematical Safari
What a great book! Has something in it on gambling, heck it s a whole chapter! My favorite sentence in the preface is The context determines how we interpret the data. Page xi. Any coin flipper would enjoy this book and as one reviewer said Every reader regardless of background, is bound to find something new and interesting in this book. Robert Osserman author of Poetry of the Universe The Jungles of Randomness. A Mathematical Safari By Ivars Peterson. One other review: A top-no
Feb 13, 2010, 6:33 am - Delta Draw - Mathematics Forum

Consecutive numbers in the Pick 6 lottery have surprisingly high probability but still < 50%Reply
nice, you made numerical confirmation of the mathematical probability results that consecutives will occur just below 50% based on your first report: (not sure which one is correct, both fall 50 %) 13,983,816 total possibilities 6,924,764 = ~ 49.51 % second results (one consecutive number) 13,983,816 total possibilities 5,430,040 = ~ 38.3 % based on larger data point sampling, you will approach 50% and theoretically should not exceed 50% if you do (excluding small margin of error)
Apr 14, 2009, 8:25 pm - edge - Mathematics Forum

Quick Picks can't match the power of Self PicksReply
K, here last nights results. Quick Picks are... 012345 22208000 And my Self Picks... 012345 30200000 Awe, gee... I guess I lose... gosh darn it. I should feel bad, but if it weren't for this other experiment I've been running. Actually, I expected these results. You might want to review your ceiloprstuy. I have.
Dec 3, 2007, 6:38 am - JADELottery - Mathematics Forum

Tesla
Review : A walk on the wildside 07 June 1997 Jane Gregory Magazine issue 2085 London Wizardby Mark Seifer, Carol Publishing, 27, ISBN 1 55972 329 7 Einsteinby Albert F sling, Viking, $37.95, ISBN 0 670 85545 6 Feynman by John and Mary Gribbin, Viking, 18, ISBN 0 670 87245 8 THE hero of Mark Seifer's Wizard is a scientist who thinks eating and sleeping are a waste of time, and instead hops naked onto a vibrating electrified plate for his daily vivification. He is more
Dec 15, 2006, 2:34 am - Blackapple - Mathematics Forum

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbersReply
Unveiling of the Digit System! I just found the perfect publication for the release of the results of the groundbreaking research in number theory being discussed here. Although it would be nice to become famous posing with a Missouri Lottery Winner's check, when and if that might occur is hard to foresee. However, The Missouri Journal of Mathematical Sciences is published 3 times a year, and with some effort, it might be possible to prepare a paper for peer review in time for the Spring issu
Feb 1, 2011, 11:58 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

IonSaliu GeneratorReply
Quote: Originally posted by IonSaliu on February 23, 2005Sticklete:You sign here as Bertil, in other cyber places you sign as Stig Holmquist. You emailed to me as Stig and also snail-mailed to me as Stiq. Hence, my perception is your name must be Sticklete.I want to clear the air, too. It appears that you are desperate to get to a formula. I might have given you the impression that I know something you dont, but something you badly want therefore I enjoy torturing you. Thats not the truth. I don
Feb 23, 2005, 9:00 pm - Bertil - Mathematics Forum

Power Mega Balls with Three Sum MathReply
We're reposting your reply from the topic How to simulate a distribution and use the lottery's own randomness against itself since this is the relevant topic. We will get back to this a little later. We are testing and finalizing a =DisimulateNexus(Numbers, Distribution, N1, N2) function for the other topic. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Hello, Jade You have made a great statistical work. But the question
Jul 4, 2015, 11:31 am - JADELottery - Mathematics Forum

How to simulate a distribution and use the lottery's own randomness against itself.Reply
Hello, Jade You have made a great statistical work. But the question is: what is this for? Can you build a predictive algorithm from this knowledge? Here's an example: Take the Megaball, once again. If the common player bet 1 number he will get 0.0666 hits per draw (1/15 = 0.0666). This is the REFERENCE or the so called Theoretical Average (TA). My question is: using this system (3 sums) how many hits can you achieve per draw? If after 100 samples, for ex
Jul 3, 2015, 9:37 am - rentappredictor - Mathematics Forum