Search

Need help figuring this one out
Can someone please answer this question for me. Thanks in advance.I want to play one pick four number to win $5,000 and was wondering which idea was mathematically better or are they the same?playing all 676 drawings for the year $1.00 st. which if I hit will pay $5,000or only playing 28 drawings randomly throughout the year and twenty-four way combo them (cost $24.00 per drawing) which allows you to match your number in any order which also pays $5,000Which of the two is the better play? Also c
Dec 8, 2004, 8:49 pm - fast eddie - Mathematics Forum

Excel AssistanceReply
The beauty of analyzing the entire history of a state 5/39 game is the macro would give me the constant strings used, if it could calculate fast enough. There may be over 60, 20 length constant strings used in an entire history of a game, but If I played those 60 strings every time I play the lottery, then I would hit the jackpot every time, of course I wouldn't want to bankrupt the system, by abusing its use. Think of it like this, when you write a paragraph or term paper, most likely you w
Sep 30, 2011, 10:22 am - thinktank - Mathematics Forum

Need help figuring this one outReply
I'm no math genius, fast eddie, but if you combo the number and it comes out throughout the amount of drawings you decide to play, you may get multiple hits for the life of your drawings, versus playing straight for $1.00 and getting nothing if the combo comes in, just in a different order than you have it. Good Luck and congrats on your prediction board hits!!!!
Dec 8, 2004, 9:05 pm - NBey6 - Mathematics Forum

Math Geniuses, Help!! "SLAG" Odd/Even Analysis - Chart IReply
Allen, to attempt an answer the questions I had to go back to review page 35 as to be sure that what I was saying was true to what she has written without putting words in her mouth... Now, even though there are specific thresholds mentioned, I'd be in error to say that she offers any hard and fast rules, set in stone. Many times she wisely uses the words consider in explaining her thoughts on play methodology. (I say wisely since its evident that she was, in the least, smart enough to know s
Oct 17, 2021, 1:09 pm - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Applications of Probability and StatisticsReply
(Warning: Tissues may be needed - this is a tear jerker!) Fewer and fewer of these less than random events exist and the main reason is that people post them. This is an astute observation. I've found it to be very, very true in the stock markets and at the racetracks, just not in the lotteries. RL-RANDOMLOGIC, If your system really does work, I'm afraid you may be too late with your warning. You've been posting various proprietary aspects of your system throughout 2010, and even into
Feb 20, 2011, 11:09 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

BETA - Neural Network in Java. Numbers PredictorReply
Is not as simple as your friend had described you. Just starting from a 101 pattern you have xxx Straight combos. THEN starts the real work...the next step when you get another pattern, again is part of many patterns of anywhere of X-X combos. And that is nothing gained until you spend some serious work stuyding the skips and history data, which depending of what state you play may or not be rigged.... So, it will come down to your playing budget, and a chance that those straight sets yo
Aug 28, 2017, 10:41 pm - Igamble - Mathematics Forum

Determinism vs Randomness and ChanceReply
Jimbo! Dude! Homey! El Diablo! You answered half the questions. Or maybe one. I can't remember. Either way, you answered what you answered and that's good enough for me. No, I don't live off lottery winnings. I wouldn't want to work that hard! Tracking numbers, marking Xs on paper and filling out playslips would take too much time away from playing fetch, which, with a black lab, the odds are very much like playing lottery. I'll never throw that kong one more time than he will retrieve it,
Feb 25, 2011, 5:29 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Global Lottery Solutions (G.L.S)Reply
I guess we must have Newb Hello to all Whilst I am putting all my concentrations on the new theory to find an easier solution, I found this piece of information very interesting and I thought to tell you about it as I have no doubt in my mind this will add more pressure to the local operators whereas in recent weeks we tend to have a lot of repeated numbers in results especially in main lotto draw where numbers are below 30s! Here it is; you know how I say lotteries are linked one
Feb 9, 2010, 3:02 pm - Moses - Mathematics Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
You obviously have spent little or no time compiling lottery data. The time depends on the amount of data you have and the amount of information you want the computer to generate. For example I have 2243 drawings in my RC5 file and it take about .3 sec. to compare one drawing with the other 2242 but if I want to compare all 2243 with the other 2243, that's 750 secs. or about 10 minutes. That's very fast compared to doing the same thing with paper and pencil but a super computer using a progra
Apr 15, 2011, 1:32 am - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Math Trick for P-3 The Old Man’s ZeroReply
Quest46, it is a good trick and a good way to learn about digit frequency in p-3. It goes hand in hand with the 2nd post on Digit frequency. The other post, which actually explains how this this trick works was the whole idea. It helped a lot of people over the years who play by instinct and feel. They might not care to go into the subject that deeply. So if they didn't have the where with all or desire to go any deeper into the reasons behind the Old Man's Zero Trick it was enough for
May 7, 2004, 11:33 am - WIN D - Mathematics Forum