Search

$205 Million:" Mega Millions Lottery JackpotReply
Lotterymania has hit the office where I work. I run some regular pools with around 14 members that play every drawing. Now that the jackpot is huge, that number has swelled to more than 50. As I walk thru the office today people are begging me to take their money and let them in the pool - and I will!!! I like looking through lots of tickets searching for that 1 in a million... correction... 1 in 135 million chance at the big money!
Apr 20, 2005, 10:20 am - mrmst - Lottery News

Ky/Tn/Ga #'s for wk of 4-10-05Reply
I found an error in my post for Ky nite: Here is the correction..Ky-Eve Due Numbers: 1,3,9,4 The most frequent vtrac at nite is the 3(27). The due vtracs are 5(49), 2(16) and 4(38). The most due double vtracs are 55(44,99,49) and 44(33,88,38). The due sums are: 7,0,1,9,2 Due roots 4,2,1,7,849 16 38 38 4927 72 50
Apr 13, 2005, 9:42 pm - Littleoldlady - Pick 3 Forum

April's Monthly Hot Set for Cash 3Reply
First, I need to post a correction, the above numbers are wrong. My apologies. My system is suppose to use the last 2 Evening numbers of the month for the following month. The corrected post is as follows:090 - 990091 - 991092 - 992093 - 993094 - 994095 - 995096 - 996097 - 997098 - 998099 - 999Again, I do apologize for the error (was in a rush at the time).Sir Metro
Apr 2, 2005, 9:01 am - SirMetro - Pick 3 Forum

Ohio Rolling Cash 5: $605,000Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on March 28, 2005I matched 2x4 for $4 and 3x3 for $30, so I got back $34 of my $40 spent which I will spend on MegaMillions tomorrow night's drawing. Correction- Nobody won so the jackpot will be worth $718K tomorrow, so I will be playing and picking 40+ combinations again with similar parameters that I used today.RJOh
Mar 28, 2005, 8:31 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

Probability QuestionReply
Correction.Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on March 28, 2005Of the 1000 possible combinations in a pick3 lottery there are three digits. A number can appear 100 times in the first digit,100 times in second digit and 100 times in the third digit, that would be 300/1000.RJOh You were right the first time.
Mar 28, 2005, 11:39 am - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

GET Low--Low pairs coming 3/11-20Reply
Quote: Originally posted by LAVERNE MALONEY on March 19, 2005Quote: Originally posted by Blackapple on March 19, 2005424-----MD. nite 3/18 correction No, that is incorrect. 915 MD's night draw for 3/19/05 Thanks Laverne
Mar 20, 2005, 7:53 am - Blackapple - Pick 3 Forum

state lottery gamesReply
Quote: Originally posted by Maverick on March 1, 2005Hard choice, but I'd pick Mega Millions.CORRECTION:*sigh* I'd go with NY Lotto. MM's odds are a worse turn-off than kissing a girl, and noticing she has a nosehair protruding out at you (that actually happened to my friend btw lol).Yea yea CO, I can already hear what you have to say
Mar 12, 2005, 7:56 pm - Maverick - Lottery Discussion Forum

TN 3/11Reply
Correction up there..... There were actually 64+ 21 = 85 six ways Thats 85 x6 = 510 Plus .... 48 doubles x3 = 144 So..... 144 doubles + 510 = 654 A 654 number group ....not 528 65.4 % of the numbers in the entire 1000 chart missing for over 2 weeks?
Mar 11, 2005, 8:23 pm - WIN D - Pick 3 Forum

The Michigan Weekly-3/5 thru 3/11Reply
Hi all,Sorry I am so late posting, I had to pick up some things at the store. Undress everything looks good, thanks for the correction from yesterday on the spreadsheet I did transpose the numbers. Tonight I am going with 640, 417, 235, 432, 239, 472, 470, and 479. I will add Undress's and Sandy's 579.My favorite is 239 which I plan to wheel.Bolade'
Mar 8, 2005, 6:24 pm - mybolade - Pick 3 Forum

Lottery software development ideasReply
Very well said BobP, just one correction to what you mention: if a program can constantly do worse than probability, then in fact this means it does work if we use it negatively. The worst scenario is when we have results close to classic probability. Then, whatever comes out cannot be used with confidence. As far as we move away from the classic probability, the better on both ends.
Mar 7, 2005, 2:52 am - lottoarchitect - Lottery Systems Forum