Search

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
Hello SergeM, The balance of my games? Well, I just saw this in my workout a little over two weeks ago and in that time frame, i would have had two wins with it. That's not working on it everyday. I haven't worked on the games in right at a year now. I don't have time to work on it everyday. I have played very little with it moneywise, but did have two combo tickets on a for sure on the 29th here when it was 947. I had 947, but my dummyhead witched the 4 to a 6 when i filled out the ticket. T
Dec 12, 2012, 12:12 am - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
Jimmy You really do have a reading impairment don't you. Have you downloaded the video and watched it? I look for data that I see as showing a good chance for a hit. When I find conflicting data I can allow one or both to hit or miss. Lets say that I have 5 strong digits but see 2 others that could show in the next draw. I can set them so that only one of them can hit within a set or both. I can set them to hit a maximun of once, twice or any amount for that matter. I don't say th
Apr 9, 2011, 1:35 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

Predicting number patterns?Reply
Ok, I'll tell ya'll what I've been doing, with not much success I might add, and maybe someone there smarter than me can suggest a better use for my excel files. Since 2005, I have kept track of each number's position. For example, in MM, the number 2 has played 42 times in the 1st position, and 2 times in the 2nd position. Obviously, a total of 44 times. This is over a total of 444 drawings. So, for each number, I know how many times it's played in each position, and total number of times playe
Apr 12, 2009, 11:00 am - rcbbuckeye - Mathematics Forum

Where did you learn coding?Reply
I am almost completely self-taught; I think the only thing I got out of taking a few computer classes was the idea of modular programming. I was doing school in the late 1970s when a friend of mine showed me a puzzle contest he subscribed to. Every couple of weeks there was a new puzzle, and there was a valuable prize to be won. I had no experience with computers at all, at this point, but from what I had heard about them it seemed that a computer would be able to solve the puzzles handily. I
Mar 18, 2008, 4:07 am - Mike Frazier - Mathematics Forum

Digit System Filters (Another Angle)
I'm sure everyone is aware that the Base 10 number system used in much of the world today is used arbitrarily. There is no compelling reason to use Base 10, other than the fact that it evolved from our primitive ancestors counting on their fingers and is now so ingrained in our commerce and culture that it would be very difficult to change to another. Here are some links for those interested in reading more on this topic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeral_system http://wiki.answers
Nov 2, 2010, 1:59 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
I appreciate you sharing this. I have ran across it originally sparking my interest in reading his published paper that I mentioned earlier. I am curious if you or anyone have comments on his process or math theories. I would like to see if I can gain insight from it in order to build a theory based method using hard science not to predict numbers (unless I stumble upon a crystal ball of course) but narrow down groups based on most likely patterns as he discusses. I for one agree that in a game
Jan 31, 2016, 12:22 pm - meenzy - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
I matched 5/6 in February in Ohio Classic Lotto(6/49) and felt I was closer to matching 6/6 this time than when I did the same in 2002 with Super Lotto which had a 6/49+1 format. Since I limit myself to 10-20 lines 2-3 times a week, I don't play OCL as much as I played OSL since I also play MM when its jackpot get near $100M+. Maybe I would be better off sticking with the game I've come closet to winning it all but it's easier getting smaller hits with MM.
Apr 21, 2013, 7:58 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
This is a little later than i expected to be back on here doing anything but, it's what i can do. Still gotta get back to what i was talking about last night. Plus, the charts are just about finished with all the new stuff added so I will be getting those uploaded hopefully tonight. But this is from todays draw here and what i saw with it from the searching sheet. Working off of the 8-4-4 from the 25th day draw, and 6-8-6 from the 24th day draw. Today was 3-8-3. The two colmns marked under
Dec 26, 2012, 6:15 pm - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Middle of tweeking this system ( PROFITS- Day 180 + $4,123)Reply
there are plenty of books on the martigale system, you can google. It's a proven winning strategy but many casinos but rules into place to prevent the strategy from winning like Max table bids of 1500 or 2500 that prevened the system from working. The daily lottory does not have those restrictions. However, that s only part one of this 3 part syste. Progressive betting, probabilities, and understanding and recognizing triggers. 3 years I have toyed witht his. Tweeked, and now finalized I believe
Apr 12, 2012, 8:01 pm - Winningsystem - Mathematics Forum

History RepeatsReply
I tried something like this a few months ago for the pick 4 but I used the last 12 to 15 draws and then got the average, standard deviation, and two more outcomes(can't remember)....then out of that I made groups of three. I believe i had the right 3 numbers 4 out of 7 draws. It wasn't consistent enough for me so I dropped it. But if anyone is interested, I can search my files; I'm sure I still have that somewhere.
Sep 15, 2011, 11:48 pm - Teamprofit - Mathematics Forum