|Posted: July 26, 2005, 2:23 am - IP Logged|
I finally found someone at work whos willing to compile what I mentioned a short while ago, in the Lottery systems category on the LP. In the past two days I've got the workings of this scheme to a jump start. It deals with compiling a data base of a million sets of pick-3 numbers randomly. Keeping that same million sets all the time, without changing the numbers, the program will look back and see the last two and three consecutive drawings and spit out a list of numbers that would show up next. Taking those numbers, and by finding some pattern orientation similarities, one might find certain groups that show more frequently than others. Maybe just one. I know this is a shot in the dark considering, the vast amount of ways , one might program randomness. The one he mentions involves picking a "seed" (so to speak) as to when to start the sequence. The seed could start at today's date and then wait a particular amount of time and pick a another number.
Steve Player has something very similair. His pick-3 Mastercash Red List. The 14 numbers that are required for somebody to play everyday isn't practical considering it only hits about once every 2 or so months. The 14 numbers that are given (which changes everyday), are the most frequent pattern oriented sets that have been derived through the analyzation of every state's results respectively since it's inception. It's not random generation that he analyzes. It's from actual results. I'd just wish he would customize according to every state's separate history, and not combine the whole country's findings.
So this is where I come in. Or my friend at work, I should say..... If I only examined one drawing and tried to make a list of all the numbers that would come out after, let's say....123....then I would probably have a thousand or more number sets to analyze. Therefore I asked him to look back 2 and 3 consecutive days and not just one, thereby reducing the amount of numbers to pick at.... no pun intended. Now I only have to contend with only 100 numbers, and seeing the common numbers.
I've taken it a step further by only ananlyzing the back pairs, no matter what three number sets he gives me. I think it's much easier to spot patterns dealing with only two numbers than all three. Once I come up with the 2 most likely numbers, i would then either box them with the third number or/and put 0-9 in front of the back pair to win $500.00.
To somehow justify this scheme would be futile. I will say this though....my personal belief or theory is that when you hit a million random numbers and higher, not reflecting lottery signatures all of a sudden doesn't matter. It has gone full circle so many times that mish-mash is as good as any lottery method of balls, or a set of full circle numbers.
Instead of just examining let's say 123...I would examine 785..429...123. When those three exact group of numbers show up, I would have a more finely tuned, or less numbers to analyze. Afterall Steve Player uses the last two night's numbers, in order to find the code in his Master Cash Red List, which will then direct you to the page where you'll find those 14 numbers to play for that night's drawing.
Only time will tell. Will keep you posted........