Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 9, 2016, 4:45 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

on ways of improving 1.lottosync idea!!

Topic closed. 24 replies. Last post 11 years ago by LANTERN.

Page 2 of 2
PrintE-mailLink
LANTERN's avatar - kilroy 28_173_reasonably_small.jpg
Tx
United States
Member #4570
May 4, 2004
5180 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 21, 2005, 8:13 pm - IP Logged

Let us say that you take 10 past jackpot game draws.

It is hard to see patterns on the whole complete numbers.

But if you do the same with only the decades and then with only the right digits, then it is much easier to see the patterns that the individual separate digits make.

As you can see, there is much more to prediction than just syncronizing a random seed and or stream to past lottery draws.

I just noticed that the Lottery Post's editor is quite faster than it was not long ago, there used to be quite a time lag between keystrokes and their appearing on the screen, now the lag is very very much reduced almost completely gone.

Good job, Todd.

BibleOnline  ParishesOnline  ChristianRadioOnline   MassOnline   Mass

"Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."

    paul762's avatar - lion

    United Kingdom
    Member #3002
    December 11, 2003
    477 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 24, 2005, 6:55 am - IP Logged

    1st draw on 23/11/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 0 numbers hit from 10

    numbers used were :- 1-2-3-5-8-17-21-30-40-43

      paul762's avatar - lion

      United Kingdom
      Member #3002
      December 11, 2003
      477 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 27, 2005, 12:21 pm - IP Logged

      2nd draw on 26/11/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 2 numbers hit from 10

      numbers used were :- 6-16-17-19-21-27-35-41-44-48

        paul762's avatar - lion

        United Kingdom
        Member #3002
        December 11, 2003
        477 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: December 2, 2005, 3:10 pm - IP Logged

        3rd draw on 30/11/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 0 numbers hit rom 10

        numbers used were :- 8-10-16-17-21-23-31-33-35-44

          paul762's avatar - lion

          United Kingdom
          Member #3002
          December 11, 2003
          477 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: December 3, 2005, 3:23 pm - IP Logged

          4th draw on 3/12/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 1 number hit from 10

          numbers used were :- 2-3-18-22-32-40-42-43-44-48

            paurths's avatar - underground
            Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
            Belgium
            Member #19287
            July 29, 2005
            2254 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: December 3, 2005, 3:27 pm - IP Logged

            Only 1? Confused

              hypersoniq's avatar - 8ball
              Pennsylvania
              United States
              Member #1340
              April 6, 2003
              2450 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: December 3, 2005, 3:29 pm - IP Logged

              forget the matrix of 5/55 or it's high odds... show me something that can beat the 1:42 odds of the red ball... I'm still working on that and still have gotten nowhere...

              Playing more than one ticket per game is betting against yourself.

                paul762's avatar - lion

                United Kingdom
                Member #3002
                December 11, 2003
                477 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: December 7, 2005, 6:07 am - IP Logged

                1st draw on 23/11/05 used a 150 sample with 1.6 = 1 + bonus numbers hit from 10

                numbers used were :- 1-5-7-13-23-26-29-30-33-34

                2nd draw on 26/11/05 used a 150 sample with 1.6 = 1 number hit from 10

                numbers used were :- 18-20-24-27-38-40-41-44-45-49

                3rd draw on 30/11/05 used a 150 sdample with 1.6 = 1 number hit from 10

                numbers used were :- 2-5-20-21-22-24-38-41-42-48

                4th draw on 3/12/05 used a 150 sample with 1.6 = 1 number + bonus numbers hit from 10

                number used were :- 1-2-15-16-18-19-22-24-30-33

                  paul762's avatar - lion

                  United Kingdom
                  Member #3002
                  December 11, 2003
                  477 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: December 11, 2005, 10:09 am - IP Logged

                  No more tests, its upto you to deliver the big one now Marco.

                  Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
                    LANTERN's avatar - kilroy 28_173_reasonably_small.jpg
                    Tx
                    United States
                    Member #4570
                    May 4, 2004
                    5180 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: December 14, 2005, 9:15 am - IP Logged

                    I think that some of us overestimated Guru and gave him too much credibility, his program was never not even close to being as good as he said that it was and might never be no matter what, we might never get an update, because no update will be good enough no matter how long we wait for it. Guru also overestimated himself and his program, a program such as that might never be good enough, it would have to be changed a lot, the program's basic prediction idea as it is or was might not be good enough all by itself, it would have to include much more beside the wheels, maybe if it worked together with other prediction helps or methods (systems) then it might finally give more winning numbers a little more often, 1 or 2 winning numbers out of 10 is not much to talk about, 1 winning number about 50% of the time and 2 winning numbers the other 50 % of the time, more or less, sometimes no winning numbers at all out of 10 numbers.

                    It is not even close to being as good as we were told that it was, I say that it might be a little better than a rng and only maybe, but if so then not by much at all.

                    Good luck everybody.

                    BibleOnline  ParishesOnline  ChristianRadioOnline   MassOnline   Mass

                    "Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."