Welcome Guest
You last visited April 30, 2017, 12:43 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# on ways of improving 1.lottosync idea!!

Topic closed. 24 replies. Last post 11 years ago by LANTERN.

 Page 2 of 2
Tx
United States
Member #4570
May 4, 2004
5180 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 21, 2005, 8:13 pm - IP Logged

Let us say that you take 10 past jackpot game draws.

It is hard to see patterns on the whole complete numbers.

But if you do the same with only the decades and then with only the right digits, then it is much easier to see the patterns that the individual separate digits make.

As you can see, there is much more to prediction than just syncronizing a random seed and or stream to past lottery draws.

I just noticed that the Lottery Post's editor is quite faster than it was not long ago, there used to be quite a time lag between keystrokes and their appearing on the screen, now the lag is very very much reduced almost completely gone.

Good job, Todd.

"Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
478 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 24, 2005, 6:55 am - IP Logged

1st draw on 23/11/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 0 numbers hit from 10

numbers used were :- 1-2-3-5-8-17-21-30-40-43

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
478 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 27, 2005, 12:21 pm - IP Logged

2nd draw on 26/11/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 2 numbers hit from 10

numbers used were :- 6-16-17-19-21-27-35-41-44-48

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
478 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 2, 2005, 3:10 pm - IP Logged

3rd draw on 30/11/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 0 numbers hit rom 10

numbers used were :- 8-10-16-17-21-23-31-33-35-44

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
478 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 3, 2005, 3:23 pm - IP Logged

4th draw on 3/12/05 used a 2000 sample with 1.6 = 1 number hit from 10

numbers used were :- 2-3-18-22-32-40-42-43-44-48

Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
Belgium
Member #19287
July 29, 2005
2254 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 3, 2005, 3:27 pm - IP Logged

Only 1?

Pennsylvania
United States
Member #1340
April 6, 2003
2450 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 3, 2005, 3:29 pm - IP Logged

forget the matrix of 5/55 or it's high odds... show me something that can beat the 1:42 odds of the red ball... I'm still working on that and still have gotten nowhere...

Playing more than one ticket per game is betting against yourself.

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
478 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 7, 2005, 6:07 am - IP Logged

1st draw on 23/11/05 used a 150 sample with 1.6 = 1 + bonus numbers hit from 10

numbers used were :- 1-5-7-13-23-26-29-30-33-34

2nd draw on 26/11/05 used a 150 sample with 1.6 = 1 number hit from 10

numbers used were :- 18-20-24-27-38-40-41-44-45-49

3rd draw on 30/11/05 used a 150 sdample with 1.6 = 1 number hit from 10

numbers used were :- 2-5-20-21-22-24-38-41-42-48

4th draw on 3/12/05 used a 150 sample with 1.6 = 1 number + bonus numbers hit from 10

number used were :- 1-2-15-16-18-19-22-24-30-33

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
478 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 11, 2005, 10:09 am - IP Logged

No more tests, its upto you to deliver the big one now Marco.

Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
Tx
United States
Member #4570
May 4, 2004
5180 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 14, 2005, 9:15 am - IP Logged

I think that some of us overestimated Guru and gave him too much credibility, his program was never not even close to being as good as he said that it was and might never be no matter what, we might never get an update, because no update will be good enough no matter how long we wait for it. Guru also overestimated himself and his program, a program such as that might never be good enough, it would have to be changed a lot, the program's basic prediction idea as it is or was might not be good enough all by itself, it would have to include much more beside the wheels, maybe if it worked together with other prediction helps or methods (systems) then it might finally give more winning numbers a little more often, 1 or 2 winning numbers out of 10 is not much to talk about, 1 winning number about 50% of the time and 2 winning numbers the other 50 % of the time, more or less, sometimes no winning numbers at all out of 10 numbers.

It is not even close to being as good as we were told that it was, I say that it might be a little better than a rng and only maybe, but if so then not by much at all.

Good luck everybody.

"Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."

 Page 2 of 2