|Posted: September 9, 2006, 3:49 pm - IP Logged|
The pros of the lucky for Life game:
1: Its still a ball generated game
2: It does carry a long term guaranteed minimum payout for the grandprize holder.
3: Its odds are okay.
1: It has a low volume of winners each play
2: Paying 2$ for a one line ticket doesnt compare to Match6 .
3: They have an instant 2dollar ticket that has better odds called Win for Life. (and it pays out 1k per week! for the grandprize)
Overall I disagree though with Four4me on the fact that the residence of PA chose this. Just because there is an online poll doesnt mean it was *only* the folks of pa that participated in it. I for one do recall the PA website asking for suggestions and questionaire, but NO where did I or my associates specifically say "yes we want a 2$ game that has poor payouts or low volume of grandprize winners".
As with politics you can take data and bend it.
~~Is it true, Is it kind,Is it necessary. ~~~
Thanks be to the giving numbers: 1621,912,119 02014