Thanks a lot, but I would be lying if I say that I understand what those numbers, stats and charts mean.
Your spreadsheets and their stats are way beyond me, that stuff passes over my head as they say, it is way beyond my comprehension, just the same, thanks very much.
It is true that I have not taken the time to study Excel and your spreadsheets yet, sorry.
But even if I had I might still not be able to understand a lot of what is in them.
Thank you again anyway.
As to this filters thread:
I have already shown more than enough filters, just take a good look at all of my filters' posts as Lantern and as Excalibur.
The thing to learn is how to use them and better, how to use them right in a way that will reduce the filters' failures as much as possible.
The problem is that there are an unacceptable number or percent of filters' failures.
As the failures of filters add-up (Together) to each other, so that the more filters used the more filters' failures that there will be.
There are many ways in which filters can be used, some of them produce fewer gains and more failures than others.
Very close and repeated observation of the past draws and their stats are a most do for the filters' proper use.
Imagination most also be used and many things tried out.
The failures defeat the purpose of using the filters as we all know.
There-fore tricks and or ways that minimize the failures of filters most be found and then used.
This might be an on-going process as causes and their solutions might change, so minimizing failures might be a dynamic process.
Anyhow, one maybe should play detective and find causes and solutions if it is possible to do.
One needs to try to analyze the possible cause or causes of why a particular filter failed at a particular draw, of course the direct and main cause was that a particular pattern was used as a filter, but Why it worked with one or more draws and failed with one or more others?
It is obvious that static filters' techniques will produce many failures.
And the same with semi-static (Semi-dynamic), that is techniques that have both: Static and dynamic filters' elements in them.
Perhaps some kind of more fluid or dynamic filters' techniques are needed to reduce the number of failures as much as possible.
This things are easier said than done, but I have made some small advances in that.
Filters I have many (More than enough), but I still don't have enough right ways of using them.
In the future and soon I will no longer try to find new filters, just right ways of using them.
Talks of "Random" are unproductive and one most stay away from them.
The only truth is that everything is "Relative", "In Relation to", or "Relative to", there is no "Random", just "Relativity" and "It's Cause and Re-Action", "In Relation To"
That and "Statistics" or "Relative to" "Statistics" is all that matters "Prediction-Wise".
Now those words might put and end to this particular thread.
I again repeat, there is a lot of information in very many of my past posts, but mostly on my filters' post.
They are a most for proper understanding of pick 3 filters and their use.
Yes, I know that again I am not telling everything, but Who ever does?
Besides, I have told a lot, Haven't I?