|Posted: October 16, 2006, 11:02 pm - IP Logged|
Thank you Sysp34.
I was surprised that in 100 draws for ga. evening there were about 59 repeats of digits from the night before. I would have thought more would repeat.
A bigger surprise was the few repeats by position. (digits repeating on Top of each other) during the 100 days.
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3
7 10 6 >>>>> times per 100
I counted by eye sooo.. could be a couple of errors there but it is encouraging to find digits repeat on TOP of themself less than 10 % of the time. "Three Card Monty" seems good for Ga. Eve.
Thanks again for the figures.
I didn't count the repeats myself, but it might be that many of the repeats per each position happened independently of the repeats of other positions.
I don't know if I worded that right.
What I mean is that filters' failures in one position add up to filters' failures in other positions.
So that particular filter could have failed on those 100 draws a total of from 10 to 23 draws, that is from a minimum of 10% to 23%, the correct figure (Actual) or percent has to perhaps be somewhere in between those two percent figures.
As I said, I didn't count the repeats myself, so I don't know in how many draws out of the 100 that particular filter failed.
But even at a maximum high of 23% the failures are kind of low enough for a filter that filters 30% of the total straight draws, as 30 - 20 = 10 = a 10 percent filters' "GAIN".
Chances are that the "Gain" might be higher than that if 2 positions failed together more often, then maybe the total draws failed could maybe have been about 16 or so instead of 20, but I don't know.