|Posted: November 23, 2006, 10:34 am - IP Logged|
I am currently of the opinion that the best area to work in right now is how to deal with the remaining reduced/filtered combinations. There are numerous great filters/reduction methods/observations. But all of them keep running into the same wall...a huge amount of left over combinations to choose from. On the flip side. you can use to many filters/reduction methods and filter/reduce yourself right out of the winning combinations. This happens because the error factor of multiple reductions/filters is multiplicative. And you'll find, that even though each restriction is valid, at least one or more of them will end up coming out not valid when you analyze what went wrong.
So, what do you do? Some previous ideas include...picking randomly from the left over combination, selecting ccombinations that have no duplicating numbers, selecting the numbers that come up the most in your list of valid combinations, finding the most frequent pairing of numbers in your list of valid combinations.... and on and on.
Anyway, that's where I'm at, working with different methods after filtering/reducing. Have kept an eye on the overall error factor of my reductions. Then monitoring to see if the amount of hits is above expection values. And also to see how many of the lotto numbers I captured from the draw. Run the system for two(2) weeks, make a minor few changes, monitor again and compare to the stats of the last system.
So, if you think you have a unique way of selecting numbers/combinations after filtering/reducing...I'd love to hear about it.
Again, all comments are welcome.
You are a slave to the choices you have made. jk
Even a blind squirrel will occasioanlly find an acorn.