Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 5, 2016, 3:33 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Possible Lottosync V1.8 Xmas Release?

Topic closed. 54 replies. Last post 10 years ago by MillionsWanted.

Page 3 of 4
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar

Canada
Member #2352
September 19, 2003
42 Posts
Offline
Posted: December 25, 2006, 3:21 pm - IP Logged

I don't think Marco pays much attention to holidays or specific dates. I think he wants to come up with something that works.

We would be more disappointed if he issued V1.8 and it didn't perform any better than the others than not getting something for Christmas. Besides, I'm sure he has a family that wants his attention this time of year.

 Hopefully, the wait will be worth it.

    Avatar

    Canada
    Member #2859
    November 23, 2003
    463 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: December 25, 2006, 4:05 pm - IP Logged

    I don't think Marco pays much attention to holidays or specific dates. I think he wants to come up with something that works.

    We would be more disappointed if he issued V1.8 and it didn't perform any better than the others than not getting something for Christmas. Besides, I'm sure he has a family that wants his attention this time of year.

     Hopefully, the wait will be worth it.

    also true and well put popeye.

     

    we'll just have to wait it seems 

      paurths's avatar - underground
      Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
      Belgium
      Member #19287
      July 29, 2005
      2254 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: December 25, 2006, 9:16 pm - IP Logged

      Monaco...

      lasas3

      An onion a day keeps everyone away!!!

        Avatar
        Fergus
        Canada
        Member #5532
        July 9, 2004
        87 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: December 26, 2006, 10:01 am - IP Logged

        I hope he is true to his word and 1.8 will support Keno as well.  I look forward to testing it on Ontario Daily Keno.

        Raziel

          Avatar

          Canada
          Member #2859
          November 23, 2003
          463 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: December 27, 2006, 1:19 am - IP Logged

          I hope he is true to his word and 1.8 will support Keno as well.  I look forward to testing it on Ontario Daily Keno.

          Raziel

          same here Raziel. I'll be using it mostly for Ontario keno.

          BTW did you see tonights results, Dec 26 2006, look at this sequence:

          11--13-14-15-16-17-18

          55-56-57

            paul762's avatar - lion

            United Kingdom
            Member #3002
            December 11, 2003
            477 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: December 28, 2006, 11:10 am - IP Logged

            Marco I know you read these postings, so here goes..... a while back you mentioned that you had thought of a way to predict randomness somewhat and you couldnt believe how everyone else could have missed it and then lottosync was born etc. etc. 

            So instead, why not just tell everyone who missed it, what you found out/discovered, and maybe people on here might be able to improve upon your idea and make it even more accurate? This to me seems to be fairer than what is happening at present with the unknown lottosync release and no communication etc. - what do you think ?

            Im hoping to still be here in about 2 years if you want to answer. Wink

            Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.

              Belgium
              Member #2220
              September 2, 2003
              553 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: December 28, 2006, 3:50 pm - IP Logged

              Paul,

              I cannot do what you ask...

              If you knew how many hours I've spent developing the mathematical model for lottosync, you would surely understand why I don't want to make this an open source thing.

              While you are sleeping... I am thinking... trying... retrying... creating... endlessly. 

              This may seem selfish or greedy, but you probably worked hard for some things you own too. Would you really be prepared to give away your car... or the house you live in ?

              I have invested all my time, my health, and sometimes my relationship too in this thing...

              If lottosync didn't work, I wouldn't care to give the code away !! I'd put it online for everyone, but it actually works... maybe not as fast and as good as we all ultimately would wish, but it does work a hell of a lot better than any other method I've seen or tried.

              I understand that waiting is sometimes a difficult thing, but I'm doing the best I can and I will continue doing so. Cheers

              regards,

              Marco

                Avatar
                Fergus
                Canada
                Member #5532
                July 9, 2004
                87 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: December 28, 2006, 4:53 pm - IP Logged

                Good to here from you Marco.  Looking forward to gettign 1.8 soon like you mentioned.  Can't wait to test it on Ontario Keno.  I assume Vick can't wait either.

                All the best

                Raziel

                  Avatar

                  United States
                  Member #2460
                  October 7, 2003
                  766 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: December 29, 2006, 4:42 am - IP Logged

                  Paul,

                  I cannot do what you ask...

                  If you knew how many hours I've spent developing the mathematical model for lottosync, you would surely understand why I don't want to make this an open source thing.

                  While you are sleeping... I am thinking... trying... retrying... creating... endlessly. 

                  This may seem selfish or greedy, but you probably worked hard for some things you own too. Would you really be prepared to give away your car... or the house you live in ?

                  I have invested all my time, my health, and sometimes my relationship too in this thing...

                  If lottosync didn't work, I wouldn't care to give the code away !! I'd put it online for everyone, but it actually works... maybe not as fast and as good as we all ultimately would wish, but it does work a hell of a lot better than any other method I've seen or tried.

                  I understand that waiting is sometimes a difficult thing, but I'm doing the best I can and I will continue doing so. Cheers

                  regards,

                  Marco

                  Marco. 

                  Lower prizes here on the USA pay next to nothing on most games, at least here on Texas.

                  So perhaps jackpot games most be played mostly or only for the top 2 prizes.

                  I don't see the past LottoSync as being a complete solution.

                  Perhaps it is more effective if used for your country's lottery game, as perhaps it was designed for it.

                  There are partially effective prediction solutions for many lottery games and sometimes when 2 or more of such solutions are combined, better predictions are made.

                  It would seem as if the prediction power of LottoSync needs to be enhanced, augmented or aided.

                  There is more than one way to successful prediction, at least this is true for some lottery games and just might be true for all of them.

                  I don't see why some kind of compound prediction method can't be made to work well enough for jackpot kind of games.

                  While lottery prediction might always be a work in progress and LottoSync also, I do hope that we do get a copy of whatever it is that you have right now, the downside to this is that some of your "Customers" as you might know, might never be happy with any kind of LottoSync program that you might give to them, but in truth you just promised them too much and so they expect much.

                  It is in part their fault, as claims should be taken as nothing until proven otherwise.

                  Saint Thomas had it right! To see to believe.

                  But in his case, he had already seen more than enough before hand and still had trouble believing. 

                  I have seen and  heard enough of LottoSync from others to suggest prediction potential, but mostly untaped potential.

                  I have the program myself, but can't use it as it is right now on all the released versions, waste of time and mostly computer time, perhaps once it is better on a newer version, if (?).

                  Either way, I would prefer not nagging you about it to death (So to speak).

                  Good luck. 

                  Fernando. 

                  EXCALIBUR is no more that "Handle" is dead, gone.
                  Maybe sometime in the future I might come back as LANTERN again, but maybe not, if I don't come back as LANTERN in the future then I won't come back at all, but as I said there is no more EXCALIBUR.


                    Belgium
                    Member #2220
                    September 2, 2003
                    553 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: December 29, 2006, 11:54 am - IP Logged

                    Marco. 

                    Lower prizes here on the USA pay next to nothing on most games, at least here on Texas.

                    So perhaps jackpot games most be played mostly or only for the top 2 prizes.

                    I don't see the past LottoSync as being a complete solution.

                    Perhaps it is more effective if used for your country's lottery game, as perhaps it was designed for it.

                    There are partially effective prediction solutions for many lottery games and sometimes when 2 or more of such solutions are combined, better predictions are made.

                    It would seem as if the prediction power of LottoSync needs to be enhanced, augmented or aided.

                    There is more than one way to successful prediction, at least this is true for some lottery games and just might be true for all of them.

                    I don't see why some kind of compound prediction method can't be made to work well enough for jackpot kind of games.

                    While lottery prediction might always be a work in progress and LottoSync also, I do hope that we do get a copy of whatever it is that you have right now, the downside to this is that some of your "Customers" as you might know, might never be happy with any kind of LottoSync program that you might give to them, but in truth you just promised them too much and so they expect much.

                    It is in part their fault, as claims should be taken as nothing until proven otherwise.

                    Saint Thomas had it right! To see to believe.

                    But in his case, he had already seen more than enough before hand and still had trouble believing. 

                    I have seen and  heard enough of LottoSync from others to suggest prediction potential, but mostly untaped potential.

                    I have the program myself, but can't use it as it is right now on all the released versions, waste of time and mostly computer time, perhaps once it is better on a newer version, if (?).

                    Either way, I would prefer not nagging you about it to death (So to speak).

                    Good luck. 

                    Fernando. 

                    Excalibur,

                     

                    Lower prizes can make you a lot of money too... in the Belgian lottery matching 3 numbers pays only 2.5 Euro.

                    But, if you can match 3 numbers on a regular basis with playing only a single 6 number combination... Then play that single combination a 1000 times for the same draw and you win 2500 Euro.

                    In Belgium 1 ticket costs 0.5 Euro

                    0.5 X 1000 = 500 Euro

                    Suppose you can match 3 numbers with playing a single combination aproximately once in 4 draws.

                    Expense = 500 Euro X 4 = 2000 Euro

                    Return = 2500 Euro

                    Gain = 500 Euro

                    This way you could earn 500 Euro every two weeks... that's 1000 Euro / month with only matching 3 numbers.... and suppose you match 4 or 5 !!!!!

                    Ofcourse, this is an extreme example... filling in a thousand tickets may be just a bit insane.

                    ----------------

                    I don't believe other prediction schemes could make lottosync a more "complete solution". So far I have seen no system that works as good as 1.8 does.

                    I've checked Neural net systems... the unavoidable hot,cold,due systems.... the combinatorial trick systems... the complete crap systems... systems that use regression methods...

                    None of them actually make a significant difference in lotto prediction. They do not perform better than guessing.

                    That doesn't mean that all these systems (Neural nets, regression) are bad... they are simply not designed for predicting random events.

                    Above that... stacking different methods on top of each other does not lead to better predictions !!  bad + bad + bad = still bad

                    Even if a few of the diff methods could by accident come up with a good result the end result would be bad.

                    bad + bad + good + bad + good = most likely still bad

                    NO

                    I believe in using 1 single decent strategy.

                    -------------------------------

                    I think lotto players tend to forget how bad their chances of winning actually are...

                      paul762's avatar - lion

                      United Kingdom
                      Member #3002
                      December 11, 2003
                      477 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: December 29, 2006, 1:34 pm - IP Logged

                      Excalibur,

                       

                      Lower prizes can make you a lot of money too... in the Belgian lottery matching 3 numbers pays only 2.5 Euro.

                      But, if you can match 3 numbers on a regular basis with playing only a single 6 number combination... Then play that single combination a 1000 times for the same draw and you win 2500 Euro.

                      In Belgium 1 ticket costs 0.5 Euro

                      0.5 X 1000 = 500 Euro

                      Suppose you can match 3 numbers with playing a single combination aproximately once in 4 draws.

                      Expense = 500 Euro X 4 = 2000 Euro

                      Return = 2500 Euro

                      Gain = 500 Euro

                      This way you could earn 500 Euro every two weeks... that's 1000 Euro / month with only matching 3 numbers.... and suppose you match 4 or 5 !!!!!

                      Ofcourse, this is an extreme example... filling in a thousand tickets may be just a bit insane.

                      ----------------

                      I don't believe other prediction schemes could make lottosync a more "complete solution". So far I have seen no system that works as good as 1.8 does.

                      I've checked Neural net systems... the unavoidable hot,cold,due systems.... the combinatorial trick systems... the complete crap systems... systems that use regression methods...

                      None of them actually make a significant difference in lotto prediction. They do not perform better than guessing.

                      That doesn't mean that all these systems (Neural nets, regression) are bad... they are simply not designed for predicting random events.

                      Above that... stacking different methods on top of each other does not lead to better predictions !!  bad + bad + bad = still bad

                      Even if a few of the diff methods could by accident come up with a good result the end result would be bad.

                      bad + bad + good + bad + good = most likely still bad

                      NO

                      I believe in using 1 single decent strategy.

                      -------------------------------

                      I think lotto players tend to forget how bad their chances of winning actually are...

                      Marco getting 3 numbers from 3 correct on Irish Lotto pays around 600/1 here, any Ideas I could use before V1.8 is released, either with or without V1.6 ?

                      Thanks Thumbs Up

                      Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.
                        Avatar

                        Canada
                        Member #2859
                        November 23, 2003
                        463 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: December 31, 2006, 1:27 pm - IP Logged

                        i wonder if we get our grubby hands on 1.8 in January. Sure like to stick it to the government lottos and take their money $$$ Tax Free

                          RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                          mid-Ohio
                          United States
                          Member #9
                          March 24, 2001
                          19825 Posts
                          Online
                          Posted: December 31, 2006, 1:52 pm - IP Logged

                          Has anyone found any software that works better than Lottosync ?

                           * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                             
                                       Evil Looking       

                            Avatar

                            United States
                            Member #2460
                            October 7, 2003
                            766 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: December 31, 2006, 3:01 pm - IP Logged

                            Has anyone found any software that works better than Lottosync ?

                            For a very short time years ago I took a quick look at the Texas' jackpot games and also tested only 2 jackpot games softwares for a very short time, with the help of those 2 programs I got 2 numbers right on from 1 to 3 lines (1 to 3 combinations) this was done 3 or 4 consecutive times (Draws), sometimes got 2 numbers right on 1 combination and also 1 number right on another one and one got 2 numbers right on one together with another 2 numbers right on another one, but as I could not get 3 numbers right on any one line I very soon gave up on Jackpot games.

                            Those 2 programs each by themselves were not that good, but they would give 2 numbers often on 1 or 2 lines out of 10 more or less and some times (But not often enough) 3 numbers also on one of those lines.

                            As one day I might go back to those games, I won't mention the programs, but one of them is already dead and so can't be used any more, it can only be activated and updated online from it's site which has been dead for quite a while (RIP), due to lack of sales as it's programmer was deaf to advice from the program's users and didn't want to make needed changes to his program.

                            I gave him advice and he didn't listen, so his program is no longer for sale, as few people would buy it as it was.

                            EXCALIBUR is no more that "Handle" is dead, gone.
                            Maybe sometime in the future I might come back as LANTERN again, but maybe not, if I don't come back as LANTERN in the future then I won't come back at all, but as I said there is no more EXCALIBUR.

                              paul762's avatar - lion

                              United Kingdom
                              Member #3002
                              December 11, 2003
                              477 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: December 31, 2006, 4:27 pm - IP Logged

                              Has anyone found any software that works better than Lottosync ?

                              No I havent as yet, done 4 numbers on irish lotto using V1.6 (sample 150) = (5-11-28-40)

                              (pays 6000/1) and got 2 of those and other 2 were 1 and 2 numbers away (5-10-11-26-31-41).

                              Very much looking forward to V1.8 if its better than V1.6

                              Marco - why you still got V1.7 for sale on site?

                              Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.