Canada
Member #2,352
September 19, 2003
42 Posts
Offline
I don't think Marco pays much attention to holidays or specific dates. I think he wants to come up with something that works.
We would be more disappointed if he issued V1.8 and it didn't perform any better than the others than not getting something for Christmas. Besides, I'm sure he has a family that wants his attention this time of year.
Canada
Member #2,859
November 23, 2003
463 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by popeye on Dec 25, 2006
I don't think Marco pays much attention to holidays or specific dates. I think he wants to come up with something that works.
We would be more disappointed if he issued V1.8 and it didn't perform any better than the others than not getting something for Christmas. Besides, I'm sure he has a family that wants his attention this time of year.
United Kingdom
Member #3,002
December 11, 2003
542 Posts
Offline
Marco I know you read these postings, so here goes..... a while back you mentioned that you had thought of a way to predict randomness somewhat and you couldnt believe how everyone else could have missed it and then lottosync was born etc. etc.
So instead, why not just tell everyone who missed it, what you found out/discovered, and maybe people on here might be able to improve upon your idea and make it even more accurate? This to me seems to be fairer than what is happening at present with the unknown lottosync release and no communication etc. - what do you think ?
Im hoping to still be here in about 2 years if you want to answer.
Belgium
Member #2,220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline
Paul,
I cannot do what you ask...
If you knew how many hours I've spent developing the mathematical model for lottosync, you would surely understand why I don't want to make this an open source thing.
While you are sleeping... I am thinking... trying... retrying... creating... endlessly.
This may seem selfish or greedy, but you probably worked hard for some things you own too. Would you really be prepared to give away your car... or the house you live in ?
I have invested all my time, my health, and sometimes my relationship too in this thing...
If lottosync didn't work, I wouldn't care to give the code away !! I'd put it online for everyone, but it actually works... maybe not as fast and as good as we all ultimately would wish, but it does work a hell of a lot better than any other method I've seen or tried.
I understand that waiting is sometimes a difficult thing, but I'm doing the best I can and I will continue doing so.
Fergus Canada
Member #5,532
July 9, 2004
87 Posts
Offline
Good to here from you Marco. Looking forward to gettign 1.8 soon like you mentioned. Can't wait to test it on Ontario Keno. I assume Vick can't wait either.
United States
Member #2,460
October 7, 2003
766 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Guru on Dec 28, 2006
Paul,
I cannot do what you ask...
If you knew how many hours I've spent developing the mathematical model for lottosync, you would surely understand why I don't want to make this an open source thing.
While you are sleeping... I am thinking... trying... retrying... creating... endlessly.
This may seem selfish or greedy, but you probably worked hard for some things you own too. Would you really be prepared to give away your car... or the house you live in ?
I have invested all my time, my health, and sometimes my relationship too in this thing...
If lottosync didn't work, I wouldn't care to give the code away !! I'd put it online for everyone, but it actually works... maybe not as fast and as good as we all ultimately would wish, but it does work a hell of a lot better than any other method I've seen or tried.
I understand that waiting is sometimes a difficult thing, but I'm doing the best I can and I will continue doing so.
regards,
Marco
Marco.
Lower prizes here on the USA pay next to nothing on most games, at least here on Texas.
So perhaps jackpot games most be played mostly or only for the top 2 prizes.
I don't see the past LottoSync as being a complete solution.
Perhaps it is more effective if used for your country's lottery game, as perhaps it was designed for it.
There are partially effective prediction solutions for many lottery games and sometimes when 2 or more of such solutions are combined, better predictions are made.
It would seem as if the prediction power of LottoSync needs to be enhanced, augmented or aided.
There is more than one way to successful prediction, at least this is true for some lottery games and just might be true for all of them.
I don't see why some kind of compound prediction method can't be made to work well enough for jackpot kind of games.
While lottery prediction might always be a work in progress and LottoSync also, I do hope that we do get a copy of whatever it is that you have right now, the downside to this is that some of your "Customers" as you might know, might never be happy with any kind of LottoSync program that you might give to them, but in truth you just promised them too much and so they expect much.
It is in part their fault, as claims should be taken as nothing until proven otherwise.
Saint Thomas had it right! To see to believe.
But in his case, he had already seen more than enough before hand and still had trouble believing.
I have seen and heard enough of LottoSync from others to suggest prediction potential, but mostly untaped potential.
I have the program myself, but can't use it as it is right now on all the released versions, waste of time and mostly computer time, perhaps once it is better on a newer version, if (?).
Either way, I would prefer not nagging you about it to death (So to speak).
Good luck.
Fernando.
EXCALIBUR is no more that "Handle" is dead, gone. Maybe sometime in the future I might come back as LANTERN again, but maybe not, if I don't come back as LANTERN in the future then I won't come back at all, but as I said there is no more EXCALIBUR.
Belgium
Member #2,220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by EXCALIBUR on Dec 29, 2006
Marco.
Lower prizes here on the USA pay next to nothing on most games, at least here on Texas.
So perhaps jackpot games most be played mostly or only for the top 2 prizes.
I don't see the past LottoSync as being a complete solution.
Perhaps it is more effective if used for your country's lottery game, as perhaps it was designed for it.
There are partially effective prediction solutions for many lottery games and sometimes when 2 or more of such solutions are combined, better predictions are made.
It would seem as if the prediction power of LottoSync needs to be enhanced, augmented or aided.
There is more than one way to successful prediction, at least this is true for some lottery games and just might be true for all of them.
I don't see why some kind of compound prediction method can't be made to work well enough for jackpot kind of games.
While lottery prediction might always be a work in progress and LottoSync also, I do hope that we do get a copy of whatever it is that you have right now, the downside to this is that some of your "Customers" as you might know, might never be happy with any kind of LottoSync program that you might give to them, but in truth you just promised them too much and so they expect much.
It is in part their fault, as claims should be taken as nothing until proven otherwise.
Saint Thomas had it right! To see to believe.
But in his case, he had already seen more than enough before hand and still had trouble believing.
I have seen and heard enough of LottoSync from others to suggest prediction potential, but mostly untaped potential.
I have the program myself, but can't use it as it is right now on all the released versions, waste of time and mostly computer time, perhaps once it is better on a newer version, if (?).
Either way, I would prefer not nagging you about it to death (So to speak).
Good luck.
Fernando.
Excalibur,
Lower prizes can make you a lot of money too... in the Belgian lottery matching 3 numbers pays only 2.5 Euro.
But, if you can match 3 numbers on a regular basis with playing only a single 6 number combination... Then play that single combination a 1000 times for the same draw and you win 2500 Euro.
In Belgium 1 ticket costs 0.5 Euro
0.5 X 1000 = 500 Euro
Suppose you can match 3 numbers with playing a single combination aproximately once in 4 draws.
Expense = 500 Euro X 4 = 2000 Euro
Return = 2500 Euro
Gain = 500 Euro
This way you could earn 500 Euro every two weeks... that's 1000 Euro / month with only matching 3 numbers.... and suppose you match 4 or 5 !!!!!
Ofcourse, this is an extreme example... filling in a thousand tickets may be just a bit insane.
----------------
I don't believe other prediction schemes could make lottosync a more "complete solution". So far I have seen no system that works as good as 1.8 does.
I've checked Neural net systems... the unavoidable hot,cold,due systems.... the combinatorial trick systems... the complete crap systems... systems that use regression methods...
None of them actually make a significant difference in lotto prediction. They do not perform better than guessing.
That doesn't mean that all these systems (Neural nets, regression) are bad... they are simply not designed for predicting random events.
Above that... stacking different methods on top of each other does not lead to better predictions !! bad + bad + bad = still bad
Even if a few of the diff methods could by accident come up with a good result the end result would be bad.
bad + bad + good + bad + good = most likely still bad
NO
I believe in using 1 single decent strategy.
-------------------------------
I think lotto players tend to forget how bad their chances of winning actually are...
United Kingdom
Member #3,002
December 11, 2003
542 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Guru on Dec 29, 2006
Excalibur,
Lower prizes can make you a lot of money too... in the Belgian lottery matching 3 numbers pays only 2.5 Euro.
But, if you can match 3 numbers on a regular basis with playing only a single 6 number combination... Then play that single combination a 1000 times for the same draw and you win 2500 Euro.
In Belgium 1 ticket costs 0.5 Euro
0.5 X 1000 = 500 Euro
Suppose you can match 3 numbers with playing a single combination aproximately once in 4 draws.
Expense = 500 Euro X 4 = 2000 Euro
Return = 2500 Euro
Gain = 500 Euro
This way you could earn 500 Euro every two weeks... that's 1000 Euro / month with only matching 3 numbers.... and suppose you match 4 or 5 !!!!!
Ofcourse, this is an extreme example... filling in a thousand tickets may be just a bit insane.
----------------
I don't believe other prediction schemes could make lottosync a more "complete solution". So far I have seen no system that works as good as 1.8 does.
I've checked Neural net systems... the unavoidable hot,cold,due systems.... the combinatorial trick systems... the complete crap systems... systems that use regression methods...
None of them actually make a significant difference in lotto prediction. They do not perform better than guessing.
That doesn't mean that all these systems (Neural nets, regression) are bad... they are simply not designed for predicting random events.
Above that... stacking different methods on top of each other does not lead to better predictions !! bad + bad + bad = still bad
Even if a few of the diff methods could by accident come up with a good result the end result would be bad.
bad + bad + good + bad + good = most likely still bad
NO
I believe in using 1 single decent strategy.
-------------------------------
I think lotto players tend to forget how bad their chances of winning actually are...
Marco getting 3 numbers from 3 correct on Irish Lotto pays around 600/1 here, any Ideas I could use before V1.8 is released, either with or without V1.6 ?
United States
Member #2,460
October 7, 2003
766 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Dec 31, 2006
Has anyone found any software that works better than Lottosync ?
For a very short time years ago I took a quick look at the Texas' jackpot games and also tested only 2 jackpot games softwares for a very short time, with the help of those 2 programs I got 2 numbers right on from 1 to 3 lines (1 to 3 combinations) this was done 3 or 4 consecutive times (Draws), sometimes got 2 numbers right on 1 combination and also 1 number right on another one and one got 2 numbers right on one together with another 2 numbers right on another one, but as I could not get 3 numbers right on any one line I very soon gave up on Jackpot games.
Those 2 programs each by themselves were not that good, but they would give 2 numbers often on 1 or 2 lines out of 10 more or less and some times (But not often enough) 3 numbers also on one of those lines.
As one day I might go back to those games, I won't mention the programs, but one of them is already dead and so can't be used any more, it can only be activated and updated online from it's site which has been dead for quite a while (RIP), due to lack of sales as it's programmer was deaf to advice from the program's users and didn't want to make needed changes to his program.
I gave him advice and he didn't listen, so his program is no longer for sale, as few people would buy it as it was.
EXCALIBUR is no more that "Handle" is dead, gone. Maybe sometime in the future I might come back as LANTERN again, but maybe not, if I don't come back as LANTERN in the future then I won't come back at all, but as I said there is no more EXCALIBUR.