The Anti-Quick Pick SystemPrev TopicNext Topic

• JADELottery

  

  Eagle Sun

  IA, MN, WI
  United States
  Member #21
  December 7, 2001
  5,177 Posts
  Offline
  Feb 3, 2007, 5:09 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Pilot

  Quote: Originally posted by Pilot on Feb 3, 2007

  Jade,
  
  This method you describe got me interested because of the game I play, it's NY Pick 10,
  Keno 10/20/80...because I have to eliminate 60-70 numbers each drawing it seemed like a fun short-cut, Pick 10 is so baffling because of the repeats and flag formations, it makes you think picking the right numbers is easy-about 60-75% of all the drawn numbers come from the last 3 drawings...needless to say it is NOT a cakewalk, but challenging and fun anyway. Would I be better off buying like 6 QP's for a drawing since I have so many numbers to eliminate do you think?
  
  Pilot

  As I said before, this depends on your lottery. What you should do first is get some QP's(any amount you can afford) and analyze them for a peroid of time then see how many lines may be needed to get a resonable amout of Exclusion Numbers.  I've found that for my lottery, a 6/49 lottery, that about 1 to 3 lines are good and the quantity of QP's does not matter. Could be $2.00, could be $200.00 or some where in between. For now, sample reasonably and examine. You'll get a feel for your lottery's QP's then decide how to approach it.

  The One Over None
  I Know...
• LckyLary

  

  United States
  Member #10,720
  January 23, 2005
  935 Posts
  Offline
  Feb 3, 2007, 5:16 pm

  ▲▼

  A little fuzzy on this one. I don't get why not line E? The RNG used in the ticket machine is a different mechanism than used in NON-computerized draws. I'd only use QP when the drawings are computerized because then at least it's a similar method.
• JADELottery

  

  Eagle Sun

  IA, MN, WI
  United States
  Member #21
  December 7, 2001
  5,177 Posts
  Offline
  Feb 3, 2007, 5:23 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to LckyLary

  Quote: Originally posted by LckyLary on Feb 3, 2007

  A little fuzzy on this one. I don't get why not line E? The RNG used in the ticket machine is a different mechanism than used in NON-computerized draws. I'd only use QP when the drawings are computerized because then at least it's a similar method.

  line E, line E? there are 2 posts that have a line E. What post are you referring to, 1st or 2nd?

  The One Over None
  I Know...
• jarasan

  

  Harbinger

  Maryland
  United States
  Member #44,102
  July 30, 2006
  6,763 Posts
  Offline
  Feb 3, 2007, 5:32 pm

  ▲▼

  JL,

       This method is not anti-quick pick, but a quick-pick of a quick-pick.  I have used a very similar technique out of pure frustration, just to try something different.  Two weeks ago I went out to play keno and I wanted some sets of numbers, so I used the rng on lottery post and generated 5 lines of 10 numbers, then simply drew diagonal lines through the five rows so that I had 5 sets of 5 numbers.  I took those and played 5x5spots first game, guess what ? I hit  a 5 of 5 and a 3 of 5 for a total of $906.00! I played $1.00 w/bonus ea. slip  and a tripler came up. I haven't tried it again, but I may try it with another game.  I chalked it up to being in the right place at the right time, cause of the way keno pays, but the people in the place I play couldn't believe it, someone can just walk in and win the first bet.  It is a valid method for sure, any method which gives results somewhat validates it, especially in my case two weeks ago. I think I had a good coverage or something and I also believe to put bets in late when playing keno (gives the computer less time to evaluate whats been wagered). I am not a big fan of rnging but for the huge number sets like keno or the big jackpot games it is another option one can use : Anti-Quick Picking.

  LOL jarasan
• JADELottery

  

  Eagle Sun

  IA, MN, WI
  United States
  Member #21
  December 7, 2001
  5,177 Posts
  Offline
  Feb 3, 2007, 6:06 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to JADELottery

  Quote: Originally posted by JADELottery on Feb 3, 2007

  As I said before, this depends on your lottery. What you should do first is get some QP's(any amount you can afford) and analyze them for a peroid of time then see how many lines may be needed to get a resonable amout of Exclusion Numbers.  I've found that for my lottery, a 6/49 lottery, that about 1 to 3 lines are good and the quantity of QP's does not matter. Could be $2.00, could be $200.00 or some where in between. For now, sample reasonably and examine. You'll get a feel for your lottery's QP's then decide how to approach it.

  I'm thinking about including some kind of Anti-Quick Pick/Quick Pick Analysis Function with the New Draw Analysis Tool in JADE LSG.

  It would do something similar to what I've described here.

  The One Over None
  I Know...