|Posted: June 12, 2007, 9:20 am - IP Logged|
I am currently testing my system on 2 versions of history, full and new matrix only.
I wonder if I should limit the new matrix only portion to just the last 2 places in sorted order because 54 and 55 would never be the first 3 in sorted order... or perhaps new matrix for white balls and full for PBs since the PB matrix hasn't changed in a long time...
What would you do and why?
What: I'd use the entire history.
Why: If you developed something of use now, you'd likely find that it would still have some value when/if the matrix enlarged in the future. Likewise the same applies for past data. Sometimes a pattern is much easier to spot in a smaller data-set/matrix-size; then it's just a matter of scaling up.
The alternative is to scrap all your work every time another ball is added to the pool and wait a year or two for a history to build up. You can see the flaw in that approach.
In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.