Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?(6/49)Prev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

What's the percentage of Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?(6/49)

95%

[ 1 ]

[ 6.2% ]

90%

[ 3 ]

[ 18.8% ]

85%

[ 0 ]

[ 0.0% ]

80%

[ 2 ]

[ 12.5% ]

75%

[ 0 ]

[ 0.0% ]

70%

[ 2 ]

[ 12.5% ]

65%

[ 0 ]

[ 0.0% ]

60%

[ 0 ]

[ 0.0% ]

50%

[ 3 ]

[ 18.8% ]

Below 50%

[ 5 ]

[ 31.2% ]

Total valid votes

[ 16 ]

Discarded votes

[ 3 ]

Hans

Xi'an
China
Member #55,587
October 9, 2007
1,342 Posts
Offline

Nov 12, 2007, 5:41 pm

Has anyone done any research on this subject :
What's the percentage of Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?
Thanks

Founder of Ranandom system - strive to predict jackpots!
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 12, 2007, 6:45 pm

In the Ohio Classic Lotto (6/49) during the last 100 drawings the counts of previous drawings that had all six winning numbers were as follows:
0. 0 10. 7 20. 2 30. 1 40. 0 50. 0
1. 0 11. 4 21. 1 31. 0 41. 0 51. 0
2. 0 12. 4 22. 3 32. 2 42. 0 52. 0
3. 0 13. 9 23. 4 33. 0 43. 0 53. 1
4. 0 14. 8 24. 2 34. 0 44. 1 54. 0
5. 0 15. 5 25. 1 35. 1 45. 0 55. 0
6. 1 16. 12 26. 3 36. 1 46. 0 56. 0
7. 1 17. 4 27. 2 37. 0 47. 0 57. 0
8. 0 18. 3 28. 5 38. 0 48. 0 58. 0
9. 5 19. 4 29. 1 39. 0 49. 0 59. 0
+59. 2
There were 14 drawings where the 6 winning numbers hit in the previous 10 drawings or less. The norm or average was about 16 drawings.
The previous drawings that had 5 of the six 6 winning numbers were:
0. 0 10. 13 20. 2 30. 0 40. 0 50. 0
1. 0 11. 5 21. 1 31. 0 41. 0 51. 0
2. 0 12. 12 22. 0 32. 0 42. 0 52. 0
3. 0 13. 8 23. 2 33. 1 43. 0 53. 0
4. 0 14. 6 24. 0 34. 0 44. 0 54. 0
5. 5 15. 2 25. 1 35. 0 45. 0 55. 0
6. 6 16. 1 26. 1 36. 0 46. 0 56. 0
7. 6 17. 1 27. 0 37. 0 47. 0 57. 0
8. 11 18. 4 28. 0 38. 0 48. 0 58. 0
9. 10 19. 2 29. 0 39. 0 49. 0 59. 0
There were 51 drawings where 5 of the 6 winning numbers hit in the previous 10 drawings or less.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
psykomo

United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline

Nov 12, 2007, 6:47 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Hans on Nov 12, 2007
Has anyone done any research on this subject :
What's the percentage of Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?
Thanks

Hans:
YOU should expect to HIT on @ LEAST.....................................(1)
but and all know PSYKOMO is (krazy)......................................(0)
LOL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
psykomo

United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline

Nov 12, 2007, 7:45 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Hans on Nov 12, 2007
Has anyone done any research on this subject :
What's the percentage of Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?
Thanks

YOUR last........10 drawing's like to STAB your PORK in the >>>>>BACK!!!!!!
lol
psykomo
psykomo

United States
Member #4,877
May 30, 2004
5,289 Posts
Offline

Nov 12, 2007, 7:55 pm

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Nov 12, 2007
In the Ohio Classic Lotto (6/49) during the last 100 drawings the counts of previous drawings that had all six winning numbers were as follows:
0. 0 10. 7 20. 2 30. 1 40. 0 50. 0
1. 0 11. 4 21. 1 31. 0 41. 0 51. 0
2. 0 12. 4 22. 3 32. 2 42. 0 52. 0
3. 0 13. 9 23. 4 33. 0 43. 0 53. 1
4. 0 14. 8 24. 2 34. 0 44. 1 54. 0
5. 0 15. 5 25. 1 35. 1 45. 0 55. 0
6. 1 16. 12 26. 3 36. 1 46. 0 56. 0
7. 1 17. 4 27. 2 37. 0 47. 0 57. 0
8. 0 18. 3 28. 5 38. 0 48. 0 58. 0
9. 5 19. 4 29. 1 39. 0 49. 0 59. 0
+59. 2
There were 14 drawings where the 6 winning numbers hit in the previous 10 drawings or less. The norm or average was about 16 drawings.
The previous drawings that had 5 of the six 6 winning numbers were:
0. 0 10. 13 20. 2 30. 0 40. 0 50. 0
1. 0 11. 5 21. 1 31. 0 41. 0 51. 0
2. 0 12. 12 22. 0 32. 0 42. 0 52. 0
3. 0 13. 8 23. 2 33. 1 43. 0 53. 0
4. 0 14. 6 24. 0 34. 0 44. 0 54. 0
5. 5 15. 2 25. 1 35. 0 45. 0 55. 0
6. 6 16. 1 26. 1 36. 0 46. 0 56. 0
7. 6 17. 1 27. 0 37. 0 47. 0 57. 0
8. 11 18. 4 28. 0 38. 0 48. 0 58. 0
9. 10 19. 2 29. 0 39. 0 49. 0 59. 0
There were 51 drawings where 5 of the 6 winning numbers hit in the previous 10 drawings or less.

PLEASE........agree/disagree.............don't,,,,<<<throw-UP<<<<STAT's......??
WHATCHA.........
tonking BOUT on this one in SIMPLE????????????World Laungauage
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
note:
we do still appreciate you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 13, 2007, 12:28 am

Quote: Originally posted by psykomo on Nov 12, 2007
PLEASE........agree/disagree.............don't,,,,<<<throw-UP<<<<STAT's......??
WHATCHA.........
tonking BOUT on this one in SIMPLE????????????World Laungauage
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
note:
we do still appreciate you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"What's the percentage of Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?"
Sounded like a statistical question that couldn't be answered by "I agree or disagree", don't you think?. I included charts for both 5 and 6 winning numbers for the last 100 drawings because both were part of the question and 100 drawings make the percentages easy to figure.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
Hans

Xi'an
China
Member #55,587
October 9, 2007
1,342 Posts
Offline

Nov 14, 2007, 6:59 pm

Looks like the chance of 6 hit from past 10 drawings is only 10%.
Since past 10 drawings averagely have 33 numbers,that means this strategy can make get all 6 winning numbers in 33 numbers with success ratio of 10%.
Any better strategy to beat 10%,to catch all 6 winning numbers in 33 numbers?
Hans
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 14, 2007, 7:50 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Hans on Nov 14, 2007
Looks like the chance of 6 hit from past 10 drawings is only 10%.
Since past 10 drawings averagely have 33 numbers,that means this strategy can make get all 6 winning numbers in 33 numbers with success ratio of 10%.
Any better strategy to beat 10%,to catch all 6 winning numbers in 33 numbers?
Hans

If as you say 33 numbers picked using the previous 10 drawings only have all 6 winning numbers 10% of the time then 10% is the best you can ever do picking 33 numbers that way. You can only get all 6 winning numbers out of any group of numbers when all six winning numbers are in that group. If you want to do better than 10% with a group of 33 numbers then you'll have to pick 33 numbers some other way.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
Hans

Xi'an
China
Member #55,587
October 9, 2007
1,342 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2007, 3:31 am

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Nov 14, 2007
If as you say 33 numbers picked using the previous 10 drawings only have all 6 winning numbers 10% of the time then 10% is the best you can ever do picking 33 numbers that way. You can only get all 6 winning numbers out of any group of numbers when all six winning numbers are in that group. If you want to do better than 10% with a group of 33 numbers then you'll have to pick 33 numbers some other way.

what other way for example?
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2007, 5:26 am

Quote: Originally posted by Hans on Nov 15, 2007
what other way for example?

You might skip the previous drawing and include the next 10 instead for example. (Didn't work with the sample in my first post, went from 14% to 7%)
Or you might include more drawings and use the most or less popular 30-33 numbers in the group.
What ever you do, it won't be near 100% and if you have all six winning numbers even 50% of the time in a group of 33 your odds of having three of those numbers in one combination are 1:20. You have to pick a strategy and be prepared to lose some of the time.
I've been experimenting with including all the numbers and setting parameters based on previous drawings that had similar number distribution of the next drawing, this has usually limited my number pool to less than 70% of all the numbers and combined them in combinations that were more likely to have three of the winning numbers in 25 or less lines. 25 lines is still a little pricey for me. I've only tried this with 6/49 and 5/56+B games so far. I'm thinking about trying it on the local 5/39 game.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2007, 6:14 pm

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Nov 15, 2007
You might skip the previous drawing and include the next 10 instead for example. (Didn't work with the sample in my first post, went from 14% to 7%)
Or you might include more drawings and use the most or less popular 30-33 numbers in the group.
What ever you do, it won't be near 100% and if you have all six winning numbers even 50% of the time in a group of 33 your odds of having three of those numbers in one combination are 1:20. You have to pick a strategy and be prepared to lose some of the time.
I've been experimenting with including all the numbers and setting parameters based on previous drawings that had similar number distribution of the next drawing, this has usually limited my number pool to less than 70% of all the numbers and combined them in combinations that were more likely to have three of the winning numbers in 25 or less lines. 25 lines is still a little pricey for me. I've only tried this with 6/49 and 5/56+B games so far. I'm thinking about trying it on the local 5/39 game.

As an experiment, I picked 21 lines for tonight's Ohio Rolling Cash5 (5/39) as I suggested:
05 20 24 34 37
16 22 23 28 38
11 14 17 26 33
03 18 27 32 35
02 19 30 31 36
02 16 24 27 33
07 09 26 31 37
06 20 22 35 36
09 14 18 23 34
01 03 17 28 29
10 14 22 27 37
05 11 28 30 35
15 18 29 31 33
16 21 26 29 36
04 07 17 24 38
02 11 15 20 32
03 07 12 30 34
04 20 26 27 30
06 16 18 19 37
05 19 32 33 38
17 21 22 31 34
Thirty-five of the thirty-nine numbers came up, but if there are 3 or 4 winning numbers in one line it won't matter. I picked 10 lines from the center of the batch for the prediction board.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
Hans

Xi'an
China
Member #55,587
October 9, 2007
1,342 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2007, 6:54 pm

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Nov 15, 2007
As an experiment, I picked 21 lines for tonight's Ohio Rolling Cash5 (5/39) as I suggested:
05 20 24 34 37
16 22 23 28 38
11 14 17 26 33
03 18 27 32 35
02 19 30 31 36
02 16 24 27 33
07 09 26 31 37
06 20 22 35 36
09 14 18 23 34
01 03 17 28 29
10 14 22 27 37
05 11 28 30 35
15 18 29 31 33
16 21 26 29 36
04 07 17 24 38
02 11 15 20 32
03 07 12 30 34
04 20 26 27 30
06 16 18 19 37
05 19 32 33 38
17 21 22 31 34
Thirty-five of the thirty-nine numbers came up, but if there are 3 or 4 winning numbers in one line it won't matter. I picked 10 lines from the center of the batch for the prediction board.

Playing too many numbers and try win back a few bucks is not good enough.But only when 33 numbers could steadily 5-6 winning numbers,we have some chance to reduce 33 numbers to 16 numbers and only lose one winning number.And you can win to play like 60 dollars if you are more sure of your 16 numbers have 4 winning numbers.
The hard part is hwo to reduce 33 numbers to 16 numbers and only lose one winning number.
Perhaps some filter like zone gap would help
Hans
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2007, 4:40 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Hans on Nov 15, 2007
Playing too many numbers and try win back a few bucks is not good enough.But only when 33 numbers could steadily 5-6 winning numbers,we have some chance to reduce 33 numbers to 16 numbers and only lose one winning number.And you can win to play like 60 dollars if you are more sure of your 16 numbers have 4 winning numbers.
The hard part is hwo to reduce 33 numbers to 16 numbers and only lose one winning number.
Perhaps some filter like zone gap would help
Hans

The winning numbers were 23 29 30 31 32 so the experiment wasn't successful. The winning numbers did everything I try to avoid with my picks. Three of the numbers had hit the previous drawing, their total range was less than 15, all the numbers were in the top half of the number pool and etc. While I played all the winning numbers 2-4 times in the 21 lines only twice were two of them in the same line.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?(6/49)Prev TopicNext Topic

Past 10 drawings having next drawings 5-6 numbers?(6/49)Prev Topic Next Topic