You see how many people fell for it. But it is easier to debunk NewGuys's system this way, because some, like you, come to the realization that it is not a real winning method after all.
I hate to bust your bubble, but i think you're asessment of how people here responded is totally off.
First let me say that i didn't fall for it. if you look back at my reply, I asked whether you were in a profit zone, considering the amount of numbers being played.
Second: I think it's unfair for you to judge the respondents because they believed in your little test. I'm sure people here didn't go to the lengths of checking PA or whatever state you were tracking in your little sharade. I'm sure people just took your word as proof that you happened to pick the right group of numbers to play.
It's disheartening to me that you would put your fellow LP members down as gullible, when infact you and I know that for the most part, we as a community trust others in their word when it comes to testing systems.
I'm in no way condoning his system, but for you to try to dumb down members here is in my opinion, beyond you. You should know better than to try to insult your fellow members.
5 thumbs down !
I know your intentions was a creative approch in teaching others about faulty systems. I just think there are better ways to do that without insulting others.
You have to atleast admit that when someone, including me, was asking for detailed methodology from you on how the betting process was performed, you never replied, leaving the people asking clueless as to the benefit of your experiment. The problem with your intelligence experiment was that by leaving out answers to crucial questions by individuals, who were sincerley interested in your success, left them wondering why and how.
You can't blame people who trusted you to do your homework, and then turn around and blame them for not keeping tabs. It's that simple in my opinion.
Nice try...Try it on someone else.