Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 18, 2017, 1:04 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Mega Million System

Topic closed. 83 replies. Last post 9 years ago by MysteryMan424.

Page 6 of 6
PrintE-mailLink
kjs703's avatar - batman08
Alexandria,VA
United States
Member #51062
March 26, 2007
367 Posts
Offline
Posted: April 30, 2008, 2:37 pm - IP Logged

Just to keep the record straight.............

Here are the draws in question.........

4/11/2008 14,18,27,31,42 Mega Ball = 7 
4/8/2008 8,9,31,37,44 Mega Ball = 38 
4/4/2008 3,5,40,45,49 Mega Ball = 17 
4/1/2008 4,17,26,46,56 Mega Ball = 25 
3/28/2008 7,26,27,40,43 Mega Ball = 10 
3/25/2008 38,42,43,48,53 Mega Ball = 12 
3/21/2008 5,8,17,19,41 Mega Ball = 21 
3/18/2008 13,15,20,25,44 Mega Ball = 37 
3/14/2008 3,12,18,25,52 Mega Ball = 21

 

So the Prediction was 45, 22, 05 would be in draw 3/25/08  --- 7,26,27,40,43 Mega Ball = 10  --- shows they were not...........

Since this was suppose to be 90% -- should that mean the next nine predictions should happen?

But I do not see any more predictions since March.

By the way 5 and 45 did show up in draw 4/4/08 -- but you had to wait until draw 4/22/08 for 22 to show.

    GHstudent's avatar - dancer

    United States
    Member #52765
    June 7, 2007
    54 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 24, 2008, 6:20 am - IP Logged

    What ever happend to Charles?  Did he get lost in his time machine?

    Green laugh

    Smash

    This system cost to much to play and anyone would be crazy to play it Dunk

      Yes I can beat the lotto..some day

    Micheal jackson throwing his hat

      Avatar
      New Member
      tyne and wear
      United Kingdom
      Member #15463
      May 15, 2005
      8 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 25, 2008, 5:18 pm - IP Logged

      Ok I am going to share with you all now how to get one number on the Mega Millions mostevery time.  I will use last weeks drawings to demonstrate.  The last winning numbers were
      as follows. Numbers from the game before last.

      <BR>
      <BR>
      13 15 20 25 44
      <BR>  13 x 13 = 169

      <BR> 

      15 x 15 = 225

      <BR> 

      20 x 20 = 400

      <BR> 

      25 x 25 = 625 <BR>
      44 x 44 = 1936

      <BR>
       
      169 225 400 625 1936 = 729 x 729 = 53,14,41

      Take the standard deviation of all of the numbers an then multiply it by itself and
      then devide the numbers from left to right into two numbers. You have the following group of numbers 53 14 41 41 came out the last game.

      Winnng numbers

       5,8,17,19,41 

      Find one winning number we do the same thing here.

      5 x 5 =   25
      8  x 8 =  64
      17 x 17 = 289
      41 x 41 = 1681

      25 64 289 1681 = 786  x786 =  61,77,96

      Numbers did not come out

      61 x 61 = 3721
      77 x 77 = 5929
      96 x 96 = 9216

      3721 5929 9216 = 2765 x 2765 = 76,45,22,05

      Excellent chance that 45 22 05 will come out in the next drawing.

      I am truly baffled about what on earth you are talking about!

      The standard deviation of the numbers is 12.42 (to 2 decimal places). I have tried every thing I can possibly think of and have no clue at how you ended up with 729.

      I don't know whether you mean something other than standard deviation? To find standard deviation, you first square all the numbers, which you did, and find the sum of these;

      169+225+400+625+1936=3355

      Then take this away from the total number of numbers multiplied by the mean squared, ie:

      3355 - 5 x (13+15+20+25+44/5) (squared)

      = 3355 - 5 x (23.4 x 23.4)

      = 3355 - 5 x 547.56

      = 3355 - 2737.8

      = 617.2

      Divide this by the total number of numbers - 1

      = 617.2/(5-1)

      = 617.2/4

      = 154.3

      The square root this answer

      = 12.42175511...

      The standard deviation means the amount either side a number which is acceptable. So the standard deviation of 13 for example would be 0.58 to 25.42. Even adding all these together still does not come to 729 so I am really confused.

        RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
        mid-Ohio
        United States
        Member #9
        March 24, 2001
        19895 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 25, 2008, 5:39 pm - IP Logged

        I am truly baffled about what on earth you are talking about!

        The standard deviation of the numbers is 12.42 (to 2 decimal places). I have tried every thing I can possibly think of and have no clue at how you ended up with 729.

        I don't know whether you mean something other than standard deviation? To find standard deviation, you first square all the numbers, which you did, and find the sum of these;

        169+225+400+625+1936=3355

        Then take this away from the total number of numbers multiplied by the mean squared, ie:

        3355 - 5 x (13+15+20+25+44/5) (squared)

        = 3355 - 5 x (23.4 x 23.4)

        = 3355 - 5 x 547.56

        = 3355 - 2737.8

        = 617.2

        Divide this by the total number of numbers - 1

        = 617.2/(5-1)

        = 617.2/4

        = 154.3

        The square root this answer

        = 12.42175511...

        The standard deviation means the amount either side a number which is acceptable. So the standard deviation of 13 for example would be 0.58 to 25.42. Even adding all these together still does not come to 729 so I am really confused.

        Unless the calculations are simple, most of the posted systems are proprietary and may change as conditions change.  Unless they have won in the past, understanding them is not going to give you an edge.

         * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
           
                     Evil Looking       

          Avatar

          Honduras
          Member #20982
          August 29, 2005
          4715 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 27, 2008, 4:12 am - IP Logged

          If i think you are as smart as i think you are, but i know you couldn't be as smart as i think you are...You just can't be...The odds of you been smart as i think you are and the chances of happening is so, so astronomical i'll say that such odds are bigger than Powerball...

          You could be and can be correct but again you are not as smart as i think you are...This is similar to what i've been saying about hot and cold numbers except that you use 3 columns which makes it more lethal along with smaller columns again it makes it more lethal, the more subdivision columns the more lethal....What people don't know is that even though they may appear to be X number of combinations because there is 3 colums, they can be reduced because there is also a certain order and step that the numbers follow along with the constraints...And people are not looking at the economic factor which is for who you are working for...They are not looking also at the ending digits step that numbers follow and the previous hystory of the draws elimination....But again you couldn't be as smart as i think you are...

          A lot of guys get mad here in LP when someone new joins and makes outlandish claims, yet they don't know that those people join and say what they have to say because they are trying to throw and indirect line at someone here and they work for someone else...I used to think this was crazy until i confirmed it several and several times...This just prove that this site is monitor by the state lottery and people other than lottery players...

          you may think i am crazy and you will negate (of course) what i say, but if you could take my eyeballs and see what i see, you will be so surprise...I am able to see encryption patterns on the TV that most people will not be able to see...If you don't understand what i am talking about that's better, i feel better that way....Only a few will...Most people will not even remember what was the 3rd letter of the 4th paragrap of the page 34 of their 7th grade history book...This is really funny...Is like watching a different channel when most people are not..

          Anyways i see what you are doing but again you couldn't be as smart as i think you are...You see there is a certain logic and comic common sense people have to follow to understand certain things...I too see things that i am affraid to post them here too and they are similar to what you are saying...By the way those indirect lines will have 1 word that is important and you can throw the rest of the message away...This is only if you are smart as i think you are but you couldn't be..

          if you think i am crazy i feel better and disregard what i just said...Anyways people don't know that what you say here has no meaning because after 4 days is history and nobody remembers what you said...That's why your blog is better...

            MillionsWanted's avatar - 24Qa6LT

            Norway
            Member #9517
            December 10, 2004
            1279 Posts
            Online
            Posted: May 27, 2008, 6:22 am - IP Logged

            When these "I got a system that works" people come to this forum and introduce it and then get caught in an error I will be the first to confess I might jump on them.

            The problem is they often explain their system in a way people don't understand. When they come here to show us their system they ought to make it look like a user manual with explanations on everything. Else there will be misunderstandings.

              Avatar

              Honduras
              Member #20982
              August 29, 2005
              4715 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 27, 2008, 6:12 pm - IP Logged

              If i think you are as smart as i think you are, but i know you couldn't be as smart as i think you are...You just can't be...The odds of you been smart as i think you are and the chances of happening is so, so astronomical i'll say that such odds are bigger than Powerball...

              You could be and can be correct but again you are not as smart as i think you are...This is similar to what i've been saying about hot and cold numbers except that you use 3 columns which makes it more lethal along with smaller columns again it makes it more lethal, the more subdivision columns the more lethal....What people don't know is that even though they may appear to be X number of combinations because there is 3 colums, they can be reduced because there is also a certain order and step that the numbers follow along with the constraints...And people are not looking at the economic factor which is for who you are working for...They are not looking also at the ending digits step that numbers follow and the previous hystory of the draws elimination....But again you couldn't be as smart as i think you are...

              A lot of guys get mad here in LP when someone new joins and makes outlandish claims, yet they don't know that those people join and say what they have to say because they are trying to throw and indirect line at someone here and they work for someone else...I used to think this was crazy until i confirmed it several and several times...This just prove that this site is monitor by the state lottery and people other than lottery players...

              you may think i am crazy and you will negate (of course) what i say, but if you could take my eyeballs and see what i see, you will be so surprise...I am able to see encryption patterns on the TV that most people will not be able to see...If you don't understand what i am talking about that's better, i feel better that way....Only a few will...Most people will not even remember what was the 3rd letter of the 4th paragrap of the page 34 of their 7th grade history book...This is really funny...Is like watching a different channel when most people are not..

              Anyways i see what you are doing but again you couldn't be as smart as i think you are...You see there is a certain logic and comic common sense people have to follow to understand certain things...I too see things that i am affraid to post them here too and they are similar to what you are saying...By the way those indirect lines will have 1 word that is important and you can throw the rest of the message away...This is only if you are smart as i think you are but you couldn't be..

              if you think i am crazy i feel better and disregard what i just said...Anyways people don't know that what you say here has no meaning because after 4 days is history and nobody remembers what you said...That's why your blog is better...

              And if you read what i (pumpi76) said here:

              http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175473/1039958

              and have it in mind as a constraint Jee, the potential the lethality...But for that you will need a team of scientists, semi-supercomputer and/or powerful number search algorithms...So i mean you couldn't be as smart as i think you are....

              this will count for your multiple axis or time, but time is only the 4th dimension or axis, while i am talking about multiple axis...You may not be talking about this really you may be talking really about time as a fourth dimension but i am just try to think the way you all think...

                Avatar
                New Member
                college park,ga
                United States
                Member #56868
                December 6, 2007
                17 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: June 5, 2008, 10:54 pm - IP Logged

                hello,charles there is nothing illegal that you is doing ,post some of the workout so other people can lose their money too -if you think you have a good workout -and it took you so long to figure it out ----how many numbers do you get when you play your workout on a lottery

                  MysteryMan424's avatar - batman22
                  Pelham NY
                  United States
                  Member #60411
                  April 16, 2008
                  169 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: June 6, 2008, 11:00 am - IP Logged

                  There was a guy who posted a system on how to win 3-4 digit lotto. He said play 9-6-0-3 in one's combinations for they appeared a high percentage of the time. This basicially contradicts the law of averages, I think the guy is out of his mind. Upon being pressed for more details he said to purchase his list.Folks you don't need any "lists" to hit the number.You don't need to pay anyone for the list of numbers that we are already aware of. We just need simple systems that keep the selections to a minimum so that it is economicially feasible. If it sounds too good to be true it probably is.