quite a while ago i developed some basic code that would give me the missing structures of all states, i'd then started betting and hope i would hit.
I mean, what is missing must come in at some time, right?
There are many parts to skips.
A game has a structure (frame or mechanics) there being 3 straight positions of 10 digits per each, we deal with 3 main levels: 1 position, 2 positions and 3 positions and their compound inter-relations.
There can be a skip of 1 draw, which software puts down as 0 skip or as 1 skip.
Or there can be a skip of infinite, that is the pattern structure just never comes back again.
Those are of course the extremes.
Which of them is the most likely one of them to happen and or of to happen the most often of the two of them?
The skip of 1 draw of course.
Then there is the middle ground of the skips in more than one way:
First a point in the middle from 1 skip to the highest recorded skip (For the particular lenght of past draws that are scanned at that time) for that pattern-structure.
Second perhaps the middle skips from the most common approximated lowest skips zone to the most common approximated highest skips zone from a particular lenght of past draws.
Third the approximated skips zone or area where most of the skips are or happen, that is the approximated highest density skips zone from a particular lenght of past draws.
Now what we have definitions of the middle skips, I will say that it is best to use the Second and Third definitions from above in order to find the Middle skips.
Next, Is it better to play the first half of the skips from Lowest to Middle or Is it better to play the second half from Middle skips to Highest?
My very brief study of skips has shown me that it appears as if it is better to "Play" the first skips' half from Lowest Skips to Middle Skips as that lenght is shorter in draws.
Well, most of it did come in, but it just took way too long, sometimes my bankroll just wasn't big enough and that was the end of a winning street (and it was quite a street LOL!!!)
There appears to be other things about skips, but right now I can't remember much of that.
It is easier to find what is missing then to find what is hot.
Hot can be found, ofcourse, but i always had that "overdue must come in sooner or later" in the back of my head.
It is also easier to find what won't come soon than what will.
So why not combine them? Due and hot.
And that's exactly what i've implemented into the new version.
But like Lantern said, almost everyone has a different way of zooming in on the game, and a different approach.
You can simply not create software that first reads one's mind and then magically throws the required data on the screen.
Lots of people think that way, and well, they are dead wrong!
Other people have a natural reflex of putting down any software that comes out and, most important, which is not available for free.
Well, i have news for those persons: there is no such thing as software that will each time spit out the winning numbers for the next draw.
Surely, no one would wanna buy such software! Imagine 1000 people buy such, and all play the euromillions, and they will all hit. Where's the profit in the end for those people?
It is not a good idea to sell software or give it away for free that will win too often or all of the time with automatic predictions as we won't benefit by having everybody win with it.
The software i've developed i have developed it in the first place to be a tool that will perform calculations a millions times faster than a person can calculate them themselves.
Some people want stats on straight pairs, others want digits, others want stats on skips and even others want stats on skips on skips!
The skips are very good "Keys" to prediction.
You can cut down the game into a zillion pieces, retrieve statistics and then decide where you wanna go.
The problem for most is that it takes a heck of a long time to calculate stats with pen and paper (try it, for all 300 straight positional pairs! Then, instead of doing it for one state, do it nationwide!!! You'll end up nuts and you wont be doing much else for the rest of the day! And then you'll only have the straight positional pairs!!! Go figure
I provide this info in a split second, that's the only thing to it)
Many things are just not possible to do at all without software.
Each and everyone of us has its own strategy, and that is where my program comes in. There is so much data available that there is a road for pretty much everyone in it. But, it helps if you have your own strategy.
I don't know of any program(s) that gives as many statistics as yours does.
Microsoft Word is very powerfull, but does even one person on the planet really expects that Word will spit out the perfect application letter just by starting up Word????
And, for those who like to put down any new software, does anyone blame Microsoft for that???
You know, the "tube-map of London" is a very interesting example.
But you have to look at it from a different angle. It is created to give indications.
It was not created to tell you where you need to go!!! There's a major difference here!
It helps you to get to the point where you want to go!
It is best if people develop their own prediction methods or techniques.
I will say that you are almost giving away your programs for free (and very many of them you are), that kind of software is really worth a lot of money.
I forgot to add that there can be several or even many Hot Density Skips Zones on a long section of past draws.