Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 17, 2017, 12:05 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Quick Picks Are NOT Random

Topic closed. 18 replies. Last post 9 years ago by MillionsWanted.

Page 1 of 2
42
PrintE-mailLink
EZMoney's avatar - weedss04lx1

United States
Member #415
June 22, 2002
418 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 30, 2008, 11:34 pm - IP Logged

If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.  I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way.  The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont. 


    United States
    Member #17555
    June 22, 2005
    5582 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 30, 2008, 11:50 pm - IP Logged

    That's strange. All this time I thought they were using the ether manipulation process, which now I know, they don't.

    Oh well. Life goes on.

    Crazy

      Guru101's avatar - rw6jhh
      Indiana
      United States
      Member #48725
      January 7, 2007
      1958 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 31, 2008, 12:05 am - IP Logged

      If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.  I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way.  The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont. 

      "The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased randomnumbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropysource"

      Not really.

      Gonna win.Big Smile

        four4me's avatar - gate1
        MD
        United States
        Member #1701
        June 18, 2003
        8391 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 31, 2008, 12:09 am - IP Logged

        If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.  I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way.  The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont. 

        While you were gone for all those years we've been there and done that with randomness.
        The lotteries are not rigging the games. All the terminals function in the same manner producing Quick pick tickets.
         
        By you own admission qpicks aren't random yet the word etymology suggests randomness in it's definition.
         
        Thermal noise is a waste of hot air on your part. Thermal noise has nothing to do with the machine choosing specific differentiated lottery tickets in favor of the lottery. For neither the lottery or it employees know the outcome of the draw before the drawing takes place.
         
         
        Johnson–Nyquist noise (thermal noise, Johnson noise, or Nyquist noise) is the electronic noise generated by the thermal agitation of the charge carriers (usually the electrons) inside an electrical conductor at equilibrium, which happens regardless of any applied voltage.
        Thermal noise is approximately white, meaning that the power spectral density is nearly equal throughout the frequency spectrum  Additionally, the amplitude of the signal has very nearly a Gaussian probability density function.
         
         
         
        Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary 2en- + Greek trope change, literally, turn, from trepein to turn
        1 : a measure of the unavailable energy in a closed thermodynamic system that is also usually considered to be a measure of the system's disorder and that is a property of the system's state and is related to it in such a manner that a reversible change in heat in the system produces a change in the measure which varies directly with the heat change and inversely with the absolute temperature at which the change takes place ; broadly : the degree of disorder or uncertainty in a system
        2 a : the degradation of the matter and energy in the universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity b : a process of degradation or running down or a trend to disorder
        3 : CHAOS , DISORGANIZATION ,RANDOMNESS
         
         
          EZMoney's avatar - weedss04lx1

          United States
          Member #415
          June 22, 2002
          418 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 31, 2008, 12:29 am - IP Logged

          I didnt mean rigged like the lottery was behind it.  I just meant predictable which it isnt supposed to be. The odds are SUPPOSED to be 1:180,000,000 or whatever it is to win Powerball.  Not less than 1:50,000.  The odds should be 1:36 to win a prize, not 1:3.  If everyone used my system, in the long run, the players would be +EV versus the house and the jackpots would never increase. 

            Avatar
            San Diego, CA
            United States
            Member #58386
            February 12, 2008
            290 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 31, 2008, 1:11 am - IP Logged

            Isn't what the original poster says correct?  Haven't there been many threads stating that creating numbers by a computer can not be random and that there is always some pattern to them?

              sweetbitterkiss's avatar - hello
              Michigan
              United States
              Member #59499
              March 17, 2008
              54 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 31, 2008, 8:06 am - IP Logged

              just tell me your secret i need some money i know for sure i will try it Big Smile

              one day my life will be complete ^_^

                tiggs95's avatar - Lottery-036.jpg

                United States
                Member #47420
                November 4, 2006
                3930 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 31, 2008, 8:21 am - IP Logged

                I've hit a few QP's on cash 3..So maybe I'm in on the fix..They have people watching to make sure the drawings are fair..

                  Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
                  Zeta Reticuli Star System
                  United States
                  Member #30470
                  January 17, 2006
                  10389 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 31, 2008, 9:49 am - IP Logged

                  " If everyone used my system, in the long run, the players would be +EV versus the house and the jackpots would never increase. "

                  If there was such a system, and that was the case, the game the system was beating would no longer be available to play - no lottery would be booking the action.

                  Casinos long ago took the game of Faro out simply because it was an even money bet (for most of the game).

                  Every form of gambling is run so the losers pay the winners (a lot less than the house takes in on it) and the house keeps the difference.

                  Poker is an exception, kind of-  but the house rakes the pot and in some places also rents the seats.

                  Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.

                  Lep

                  There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.

                    psykomo's avatar - animal shark.jpg

                    United States
                    Member #4877
                    May 30, 2004
                    5142 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: May 31, 2008, 6:10 pm - IP Logged

                    If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.  I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way.  The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont. 

                    EZ:

                    KAN U,........PLEASE (explain) ALL UR wonderful "THOUGHT'sssssssssss"

                    on the Lottery Post and to the >>>>> BIG-WIDE >>>>> WORDLAND ??

                    THANK'$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ >>>>> GIVE us a >>>> CLUE ?????? !!!

                    LOL

                    PSYKOMO

                      Avatar
                      Kentucky
                      United States
                      Member #32652
                      February 14, 2006
                      7341 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: May 31, 2008, 7:43 pm - IP Logged

                      If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.  I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way.  The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont. 

                      There is a 25 combination 39 number pick-5 wheel with a quick pick option on this site that is probably similar to how lottery terminals distributes its quick picks. Click on "1 to 39" numbers then "Quick Picks" and you see the 39 number in an unsorted order. Click on "Create Wheel" and those 39 numbers will be in 25 combinations. If you want 25 more combinations, click on "Quick Picks" again, the 39 numbers are now in a different order, and repeat the rest of the process.*

                      A lottery terminal could do the same thing and when someone asks for 5 QPs maybe they get the first 5 combos and machine continues to distribute combinations from that list until it needs to make a new one.

                      "I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way."

                      I can't find anywhere in the Rolling Cash 5 rules and regulations where it says Quick Picks will be distributed randomly or the process. Since it's a live ball drawing and they don't know which combination will be drawn, when a player asks for 5 QPs, they are getting exactly what they asked for; 5 of the possible 575,757 combinations.

                      Will your lottery book be in the Conspiracy or Fiction section at my local book store?

                      *If your hall of fame status doesn't include a membership upgrade, you might not be able to examine this wheel.

                        tntea's avatar - Lottery-059.jpg

                        United States
                        Member #5344
                        June 30, 2004
                        23641 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: May 31, 2008, 7:52 pm - IP Logged

                        If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.  I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way.  The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont. 

                        Don't prove anything.  Just win the powerball tonight and have some fun.

                        What is the fuss about here?

                             OLD/Vtrac   Lottery Bible         Double Warnings      Thumbs Up TN F34/F44

                          Guru101's avatar - rw6jhh
                          Indiana
                          United States
                          Member #48725
                          January 7, 2007
                          1958 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: May 31, 2008, 8:55 pm - IP Logged

                          Isn't what the original poster says correct?  Haven't there been many threads stating that creating numbers by a computer can not be random and that there is always some pattern to them?

                          Really, it depends on what scale you look at the word "random". On a low level, scientific scale, random really has no definition because everything works on a cause and effect basis. This is also why some people think there is no such thing as free will, but rather the illusion of free will. When using this logic, even something as "random" as ball drawings really isn't random at all. However, to us, it is random because of the way the human brain processes information and the limitations of the human brain. That's why I believe software can produce results "random enough", just the same as ball drawings produce results "random enough". It's just a matter of how you code the software. And yes, I believe in God.

                          Gonna win.Big Smile

                            justxploring's avatar - villiarna
                            Wandering Aimlessly
                            United States
                            Member #25360
                            November 5, 2005
                            4461 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: May 31, 2008, 9:04 pm - IP Logged

                            "If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here."

                             

                            Gee I wonder what else he wrote?

                              Avatar
                              Kentucky
                              United States
                              Member #32652
                              February 14, 2006
                              7341 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: May 31, 2008, 9:36 pm - IP Logged

                              "If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here."

                               

                              Gee I wonder what else he wrote?

                              Don't all lotteries give us the option to play our own numbers or let the terminal select them for us?

                              I've never seen a terminal print out a ticket with combinations like 6-6-6-36-39 so as long I get 5 different numbers, the terminal did its job. Maybe I should add Comedy section to where I might find his lottery book in local book store.