|Posted: April 7, 2009, 8:43 pm - IP Logged|
I have noticed that most if not everyone here attempts to reduce the numbers played into a pool of 10 to 20 numbers. From there they use wheels to determine which combinations to play. My question is why?
What is your reason for going in this direction rather than some other. And what might that "some other" be?
Almost any pattern you look at will have a lot of "junk" in it, even when it also contains the winning combo.
Suppose your game is 5/39 and you decide "Hey, it'd be neat to divide the numbers into five ranges and see how many of the winning numbers fall in each group.
Your five groups: A: 1-8, B: 9-16, C: 17-24, D: 25-32, & E: 33-39
Now, pick a favorite 'pattern', say ABCCD. A casual backtest reveals how "filthy, stinkin' rich" you'd be if you'd played that set, over the years.
A detailed look will show there are a lot of losing tickets with that same pattern (because of non-winning numbers in the same group), even on the day that pattern won. So now your quest is to kick out as many of those non-winning numbers as you can. Your winning pattern and numbers are preserved, while your cost of play is drastically lowered.
Or to put it this way, suppose your system generates 500 combos and contains the winner.
Your budget is 20 tickets. The jackpot winning combo is on line 250.
Taking out some of those losing numbers pushes your winner closer to the top of the list and closer to being on your list of played numbers.
In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.