Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 2, 2016, 11:40 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Why pools?

Topic closed. 3 replies. Last post 8 years ago by time*treat.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
NASHVILLE, TENN
United States
Member #33372
February 20, 2006
1044 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 29, 2009, 8:53 pm - IP Logged

I have noticed that most if not everyone here attempts to reduce the numbers played into a pool of 10 to 20 numbers.  From there they use wheels to determine which combinations to play.  My question is why?

What is your reason for going in this direction rather than some other.  And what might that "some other" be?

    diamondpalace's avatar - Untitled 2.jpg
    Dallas, TX
    United States
    Member #60284
    April 12, 2008
    3856 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 30, 2009, 4:50 am - IP Logged

    When the fishes are in a pond it is easier to catch than that in a lake, or an ocean.

      RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
      mid-Ohio
      United States
      Member #9
      March 24, 2001
      19816 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: April 3, 2009, 10:43 am - IP Logged

      Using small pools of numbers is an advantage only if most or all the winning numbers are in it but that seldom happens.  Having three of the winning numbers in a pool of 12 for MegaMillions or PowerBall is quite an accomplishment as attested to by the Maddog's challenges.

       * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
         
                   Evil Looking       

        time*treat's avatar - radar

        United States
        Member #13130
        March 30, 2005
        2171 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: April 7, 2009, 8:43 pm - IP Logged

        I have noticed that most if not everyone here attempts to reduce the numbers played into a pool of 10 to 20 numbers.  From there they use wheels to determine which combinations to play.  My question is why?

        What is your reason for going in this direction rather than some other.  And what might that "some other" be?

        Almost any pattern you look at will have a lot of "junk" in it, even when it also contains the winning combo.

        Suppose your game is 5/39 and you decide "Hey, it'd be neat to divide the numbers into five ranges and see how many of the winning numbers fall in each group.

        Your five groups: A: 1-8, B: 9-16, C: 17-24, D: 25-32, & E: 33-39

        Now, pick a favorite 'pattern', say ABCCD. A casual backtest reveals how "filthy, stinkin' rich" you'd be if you'd played that set, over the years.

        A detailed look will show there are a lot of losing tickets with that same pattern (because of non-winning numbers in the same group), even on the day that pattern won. So now your quest is to kick out as many of those non-winning numbers as you can. Your winning pattern and numbers are preserved, while your cost of play is drastically lowered.

        Or to put it this way, suppose your system generates 500 combos and contains the winner. Cheers

        Your budget is 20 tickets. The jackpot winning combo is on line 250. Sad Cheers

        Taking out some of those losing numbers pushes your winner closer to the top of the list and closer to being on your list of played numbers.

        In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
        Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.