But stocks also use other ratio's like 1.272, 2.618, 0.618, 0.786, 0.382, these are the common ones but there are more : 0.236, 0.707, 1.414, 1.732 but thats
making things difficult and we like to keep it easy. Winner1313 said
there are some other numbers that come with it that I call the Angels. I broke the Code useing the Golden Ratio, and the angels
I know that in 2006 there were already a lot of systems on this site so I dont know what Angels he is talking about but my guess is he was talking about
the ratios above which are actually phi squared, reciprocal etc, so they are all derived from phi (1.618).
I read several books on using fibonacci & golden ratio in stocks, they don't simply multiply a stockvalue by a ratio (or a lottery draw number for that matter),
instead they take the distance between following stockvalues (not always, there are dozens of ways to do this) and multiply that with a ratio (or divide wether or not you
are working with percentages).
using lottery draws:
week1: 15 - 36 - 8 - 42 - 22
week2: 16 - 34 - 39 - 6 - 12
You would then take the "distance" and apply ratios to it. For example : (36-15) * 1.618 or (36-15) * 0.786 or if you think the actual drawposition
is important : (39-8) * 1.618 or (22-12) * 0.382
(x1-x2) * ratio is of course a simple formula, its probably a bit harder but he said the code was easy so u dont want
to overdo it. If you fool around like this in excel you can create dozens of combinations in graphs on which you can
use the Phimatrix program, I know because I've been fighting this monster for over a year now lol.
Winner1313 also mentioned he was looking into the combination stocks & golden ratio so he must have tried this too.
What we don't know is if he made his discovery using phimatrix or simply found a formula. I do believe he had 2-3 possible
drawnumbers per ball using his formula and that makes sense as we know patterns have a habit to return in lottery.
The reason why he was able to give the Mega ball was - in my opinion - that the Mega ball draw is a separate draw
of only one number (compared to 5 winning numbers for Mega Millions) so he knows what number will be drawn next.
He also knew this for the 5 winning numbers but didn't know which place they would fall.
He also said In my system, one does not need past histories etc, just the last draw results, and from that you can get the future
draw with 95% accuracy
The 95% accuracy can mean 2 things :
1) by using floating numbers in ratios, you sometimes get numbers like 9.5126 which can be 9 or 10 (he predicted 16 or 17 and 10 or 11)
2) by using the phimatrix program he created a graph with a transparent phiratio overlay that showed where the next draw would fall,
as you are looking at gridlines its not always clear what value is underneath the gridline
As he said : it is a principle so it can be found.