Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 11, 2016, 8:42 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Quick Predict X

Topic closed. 33 replies. Last post 6 years ago by joker17.

Page 2 of 3
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #75358
June 1, 2009
5345 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 25, 2010, 2:37 pm - IP Logged

I went to Quick x's site and they want 5 bucks for each prediction session. But if the numbers don't hit, they either give you your money back, or a new set of numbers for free. That sounds resonable to me.

    Todd's avatar - Cylon 2.gif
    Chief Bottle Washer
    New Jersey
    United States
    Member #1
    May 31, 2000
    23277 Posts
    Online
    Posted: August 25, 2010, 2:59 pm - IP Logged

    I don't see why it's so difficult for the successful users to give detailed accounts. I know If I was making money, I'd keep track just to prove it....Oh well.

    As far as the Arlene Meeks testing we did, that test was skewed from the start. You were using the 5 states she was using, not your own personal states with your QPs. Also, even just one or two more wins from me playing online, which was what she recommended, would've made me far ahead of you in the profit column....lol

    This was the challenge made by Todd: http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123472

     

     

    Wow, classic "would-a, could-a" logic that gets too many people in the red.

    You picked all the states and amount of numbers to play.  No complaints from you when "Arlene" was ahead, but lots of complaints after you/she lost.  Also, last time I checked, quick picks don't have "personal states".

    That was the most public and objective test of a system vs. quick picks I've ever seen (let alone conducted), and the quick picks clearly won.

     

    Edit:  forgot to mention, you said that if you made money on buying someone's numbers, you'd be sure to talk about it.  Problem is that nobody wants to talk about it because if they did an honest accounting of spend vs. win, they would always be in the red.  Classic syndrome of the gambler without a good financial plan.

    When someone says, "Wahoo, I won $500 from those numbers I bought!!" they fail to mention the $1,000 they blew on previous numbers leading up to that.

    This classic problem is why Lottery Post is constructed the way it is:  it focuses on providing tools, data, and knowledge for lottery players to focus on their strategies and coming up with the right numbers to play themselves, and not on spending tons of money on someone else's quick picks numbers.

    Plus, it is SO MUCH MORE REWARDING to hit for a big prize using your own numbers.  Anyone who has done that knows exactly what I'm talking about.

     

    Check the State Lottery Report Card
    What grade did your lottery earn?

     

    Sign the Petition for True Lottery Drawings
    Help eliminate computerized drawings!


      United States
      Member #75358
      June 1, 2009
      5345 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: August 25, 2010, 3:22 pm - IP Logged

      Wow, classic "would-a, could-a" logic that gets too many people in the red.

      You picked all the states and amount of numbers to play.  No complaints from you when "Arlene" was ahead, but lots of complaints after you/she lost.  Also, last time I checked, quick picks don't have "personal states".

      That was the most public and objective test of a system vs. quick picks I've ever seen (let alone conducted), and the quick picks clearly won.

       

      Edit:  forgot to mention, you said that if you made money on buying someone's numbers, you'd be sure to talk about it.  Problem is that nobody wants to talk about it because if they did an honest accounting of spend vs. win, they would always be in the red.  Classic syndrome of the gambler without a good financial plan.

      When someone says, "Wahoo, I won $500 from those numbers I bought!!" they fail to mention the $1,000 they blew on previous numbers leading up to that.

      This classic problem is why Lottery Post is constructed the way it is:  it focuses on providing tools, data, and knowledge for lottery players to focus on their strategies and coming up with the right numbers to play themselves, and not on spending tons of money on someone else's quick picks numbers.

      Plus, it is SO MUCH MORE REWARDING to hit for a big prize using your own numbers.  Anyone who has done that knows exactly what I'm talking about.

      I was just busting your chops Todd....lol...Big Grin

       

      I totally agree that picking your own numbers is more rewarding, and in my opinion, more accurate, I just like to see what others are picking for comparative reasons.

      I'm wondering how this Quick x company makes money if they refund the 5 bucks if the numbers don't hit. But I'd also like to see if the winnings outweigh the expenses, just like you said....If someone claims a hit once a week, but spends more than they won, either they can't do simple math, or they work for that company and trying to promote it in the hopes that we are too stupid to figure that out....

       

        Todd's avatar - Cylon 2.gif
        Chief Bottle Washer
        New Jersey
        United States
        Member #1
        May 31, 2000
        23277 Posts
        Online
        Posted: August 25, 2010, 3:58 pm - IP Logged

        I was just busting your chops Todd....lol...Big Grin

         

        I totally agree that picking your own numbers is more rewarding, and in my opinion, more accurate, I just like to see what others are picking for comparative reasons.

        I'm wondering how this Quick x company makes money if they refund the 5 bucks if the numbers don't hit. But I'd also like to see if the winnings outweigh the expenses, just like you said....If someone claims a hit once a week, but spends more than they won, either they can't do simple math, or they work for that company and trying to promote it in the hopes that we are too stupid to figure that out....

         

        They make money because most people will not demand their money back, and who knows if they even provide it (or provide it in a timely manner)?  $5 is chump change for many people, and they won't go through the hassle to re-claim it.

        Or maybe they'll keep asking for more numbers until they hit.  Which is a completely ridiculous notion.  Quick Picks eventually hit too.

         

        Check the State Lottery Report Card
        What grade did your lottery earn?

         

        Sign the Petition for True Lottery Drawings
        Help eliminate computerized drawings!

          inittowin's avatar - 039ee315cfea4c12c8f5
          If you don't like it, spit it out!
          United States
          Member #4756
          May 23, 2004
          3433 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: August 25, 2010, 4:39 pm - IP Logged

          They make money because most people will not demand their money back, and who knows if they even provide it (or provide it in a timely manner)?  $5 is chump change for many people, and they won't go through the hassle to re-claim it.

          Or maybe they'll keep asking for more numbers until they hit.  Which is a completely ridiculous notion.  Quick Picks eventually hit too.

          Here are the numbers I used for last week in FL. Go back and check.

          ************************************

          QUICKPREDICT X PICK 3 Forecast

          Numbers used: 916, 108, 779

          Your 28 Numbers for the next 6Draws:

          943, 973, 953, 743, 543, 974, 954, 913, 923, 753

          143, 243, 975, 914, 924, 754, 713, 983, 963, 723

          153,253, 843, 643, 971, 972, 915, 925

           

          2 Digits (Doubles) Numbers

          933/993, 433/443, 944/994, 733/773, 533/553

          977/997, 955/995, 744/774, 544/554, 133/113

          233/223, 911/991, 922/992, 755/775,144/114

          244/224, 833/883, 633/663, 711/771,988/998

          966/996, 722/772,155/115, 255/225, 844/884

          644/664,033/003, 788/778

          ************************************************

          So far this week, I'm using these:

          Quick Predict X (Pick 3)
          Numbers used: 153, 464, 593

          28 Numbers for the next 6 Draws
          387, 367, 307, 687, 087, 368, 308, 357, 327, 607
          587, 287, 360, 358, 328, 608, 657, 347, 317, 627
          507, 207, 487, 187, 365, 362, 350, 320



          2 Digits (Doubles) Numbers
          377/337, 877/887, 388/338, 677/667, 077/007
          366/336, 300/330, 688/668, 088/008, 577/557
          277/227, 355/335, 322/332, 600/660, 588/558
          288/228, 477/447, 177/117, 655/665, 344/334
          311/331, 622/662, 500/550, 200/220, 488/448
          188/118, 977/997, 644/664

          It simply works! I know some people here don't care for Mike, but he has some of the best programs for predicting numbers found anywhere...

          .


            United States
            Member #75358
            June 1, 2009
            5345 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: August 25, 2010, 5:14 pm - IP Logged

            Here are the numbers I used for last week in FL. Go back and check.

            ************************************

            QUICKPREDICT X PICK 3 Forecast

            Numbers used: 916, 108, 779

            Your 28 Numbers for the next 6Draws:

            943, 973, 953, 743, 543, 974, 954, 913, 923, 753

            143, 243, 975, 914, 924, 754, 713, 983, 963, 723

            153,253, 843, 643, 971, 972, 915, 925

             

            2 Digits (Doubles) Numbers

            933/993, 433/443, 944/994, 733/773, 533/553

            977/997, 955/995, 744/774, 544/554, 133/113

            233/223, 911/991, 922/992, 755/775,144/114

            244/224, 833/883, 633/663, 711/771,988/998

            966/996, 722/772,155/115, 255/225, 844/884

            644/664,033/003, 788/778

            ************************************************

            So far this week, I'm using these:

            Quick Predict X (Pick 3)
            Numbers used: 153, 464, 593

            28 Numbers for the next 6 Draws
            387, 367, 307, 687, 087, 368, 308, 357, 327, 607
            587, 287, 360, 358, 328, 608, 657, 347, 317, 627
            507, 207, 487, 187, 365, 362, 350, 320



            2 Digits (Doubles) Numbers
            377/337, 877/887, 388/338, 677/667, 077/007
            366/336, 300/330, 688/668, 088/008, 577/557
            277/227, 355/335, 322/332, 600/660, 588/558
            288/228, 477/447, 177/117, 655/665, 344/334
            311/331, 622/662, 500/550, 200/220, 488/448
            188/118, 977/997, 644/664

            It simply works! I know some people here don't care for Mike, but he has some of the best programs for predicting numbers found anywhere...

            Impressive, but those numbers would have to be played as a comparison tool because that's just too many numbers to play both mid and eve.

            Both the singles and the doubles are 84 combos in total. Playing them 50 centsbox/50 cents straight for both mid and eve for 7 days would cost $$1,176.00

            You had 2 straight/box hits for $290.00 each, and six boxed wins for $40.00 each, which totals...$820.00 won

            You would've lost $356.00

              Todd's avatar - Cylon 2.gif
              Chief Bottle Washer
              New Jersey
              United States
              Member #1
              May 31, 2000
              23277 Posts
              Online
              Posted: August 25, 2010, 6:42 pm - IP Logged

              Impressive, but those numbers would have to be played as a comparison tool because that's just too many numbers to play both mid and eve.

              Both the singles and the doubles are 84 combos in total. Playing them 50 centsbox/50 cents straight for both mid and eve for 7 days would cost $$1,176.00

              You had 2 straight/box hits for $290.00 each, and six boxed wins for $40.00 each, which totals...$820.00 won

              You would've lost $356.00

              Amen to that ... nice analysis.  Big lists of numbers are important tools for lottery players, but they are terrible as far as proving a system works.  Any good system needs to involve a budget and a proper means for narrowing the numbers played to work within that budget.

              A list of QUICK PICKS of the same size of numbers will also hit that many times.

               

              Check the State Lottery Report Card
              What grade did your lottery earn?

               

              Sign the Petition for True Lottery Drawings
              Help eliminate computerized drawings!


                United States
                Member #68002
                December 10, 2008
                477 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: August 25, 2010, 6:46 pm - IP Logged

                I prefer playing on a budget and never play more than 15 numbers cause you can always bet them at .50 each which is $7.50 that way you don't go broke when you lose.A system  is only as good as the player using it if he analyses  the data correctly or not some times  you'll get and some times you won't so by placing smaller more reasonable bets  you can stay in the game.

                  majakman's avatar - avatar1owr

                  United States
                  Member #84857
                  January 4, 2010
                  21 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: August 25, 2010, 6:48 pm - IP Logged

                  Whether you like the man or not is totally irrelevant.

                  His systems work and I have a track record to prove it. If they didn't I wouldn't keep going back.

                  I am waaaaay ahead in the profit column.

                   Majakman


                    United States
                    Member #75358
                    June 1, 2009
                    5345 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: August 25, 2010, 6:52 pm - IP Logged

                    Amen to that ... nice analysis.  Big lists of numbers are important tools for lottery players, but they are terrible as far as proving a system works.  Any good system needs to involve a budget and a proper means for narrowing the numbers played to work within that budget.

                    A list of QUICK PICKS of the same size of numbers will also hit that many times.

                    The only way that would work is to either stop playing for that week once you hit a straight..(If you ever hit a straight), or play online. Even though I have a couple of friends who do play online without problems, I still have reservations about sending money to Costa Rica....lol


                      United States
                      Member #75358
                      June 1, 2009
                      5345 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: August 25, 2010, 6:54 pm - IP Logged

                      Whether you like the man or not is totally irrelevant.

                      His systems work and I have a track record to prove it. If they didn't I wouldn't keep going back.

                      I am waaaaay ahead in the profit column.

                       Majakman

                      You spend 168 bucks a day?

                        inittowin's avatar - 039ee315cfea4c12c8f5
                        If you don't like it, spit it out!
                        United States
                        Member #4756
                        May 23, 2004
                        3433 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: August 25, 2010, 7:50 pm - IP Logged

                        Impressive, but those numbers would have to be played as a comparison tool because that's just too many numbers to play both mid and eve.

                        Both the singles and the doubles are 84 combos in total. Playing them 50 centsbox/50 cents straight for both mid and eve for 7 days would cost $$1,176.00

                        You had 2 straight/box hits for $290.00 each, and six boxed wins for $40.00 each, which totals...$820.00 won

                        You would've lost $356.00

                        Joker..you crack me up!


                        I never know what side of your mouth that you’re talking out of! With all of the ideas that you try to come up with to win playing the lottery, you should be the last one to talk. They all have too many combinations to play, but you always tell us that “if” you played online, you could be making a profit!!! Not to mention that you admitted to paying someone for a $2000.00 dog system!!! How's that working out for ya?

                        Well, I do play online and in 30+ years of playing the daily games, what I learned in that time (and thanks to Steve Player) was how to wager with a progressive wagering system. If you don’t treat playing the lottery like investing your money in anything that you want to make a profit in, it then just becomes gambling!

                        See Joker, you don’t know how much I have in my account to play the daily games with.

                        You don’t know how I wager and you don’t know how much I wager. I do win lots of money and by using progressive wagering; I always get my money back.

                        I feel that I do OK for myself. I am unemployed, without unemployment compensation and I still pay ALL of my bills with lottery money. I haven’t worked in 3 years and quit my job at that time.

                        I know that all of the naysayers are going to say that it can’t be done, but I make withdrawals every 2 weeks from my online betting source.

                        Have a great day and Good luck to all!


                          United States
                          Member #68002
                          December 10, 2008
                          477 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: August 25, 2010, 7:58 pm - IP Logged

                          "INITTOWIN"

                          "CONGRATULATIONS"

                          I always said it's possible  too hit on a consistant basis if you got  the money and the know how I've actually met a few players from  lottery post that  make a profit one was a woman from VA that  was a software developer she created her own software  for the daily games.Another guy I met used LottoMatrix 3 and spent $50-$100 a week and won $1,000 each time he didn't play everyday just 2-3 times a week. I  guess some players figure it's not possible  for others too  do so if they can't do it themselves especially if these players aren't on here defending there  method of play


                            United States
                            Member #68002
                            December 10, 2008
                            477 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: August 25, 2010, 8:00 pm - IP Logged

                            Well, I do play online and in 30+ years of playing the daily games, what I learned in that time (and thanks to Steve Player) was how to wager with a progressive wagering system

                             

                            I have a few  steve player  fans from GA  that swear by some of his systems and "progressive  wagering" it really works when  applied properly.


                              United States
                              Member #68002
                              December 10, 2008
                              477 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: August 25, 2010, 8:06 pm - IP Logged

                              If you don’t treat playing the lottery like investing your money in anything that you want to make a profit in, it then just becomes gambling!

                               

                              You know I never thought of it that way this makes a lot of sense if your just gambling then your pretty much guaranteed not too make a profit but if you apply some kind of wagering  strategy along with a good system for picking the numbers I don't see why it couldn't be done.