Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 23, 2017, 5:52 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Help Me ?How Do I Do The Pick 3 Pi Method,Can Some One Explain It Too Me Please?

Topic closed. 2 replies. Last post 6 years ago by kellmellus55.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar

United States
Member #98457
October 7, 2010
116 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 8, 2010, 6:00 pm - IP Logged

Were can i learn the pick 3 PI method.Can anyone help me out ,please.

    kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
    Clarkston,MI
    United States
    Member #35082
    March 12, 2006
    594 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 9, 2010, 9:09 am - IP Logged

    Were can i learn the pick 3 PI method.Can anyone help me out ,please.

    The time now is 1825 May 22, 2003.

     

    Time 1833

    ADP002/ 220503 EMD3


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    289 758 -574 304 -120
    298 761 -571 307 -117
    829 930 -402 476 52
    892 950 -382 496 72
    928 961 -371 507 83
    982 979 -353 525 101

     

    Drawing Results Thu. May 22, 2003: 864

     

    The Michigan Daily 3 results for the evening of May 22, 2003 are 8,6, and 4 in this order.

    The below posting represents the error that is common for those viewers determining a position for the number 9. As you can see the sum of 862 plus 666 divided by pi will give us a rounded number of 486.

    I commonly make the error of inverting 6 and 9 as these symbols apart from their meaning, are identical in shape and size. As you learn how to remote view numbers, beware of the relative position of 9 and 6. Do not confuse these two numbers as I have done on this day.


    a b c x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    2 8 6 286 757 -575 303 -121
    2 6 8 268 751 -581 297 -127< br> 8 2 6 826 929 -403 475 51
    8 6 2 862 940 -392 486 62
    6 2 8 628 866 -466 412 -12
    6 8 2 682 883 -449 429 5


    a b c x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    2 8 9 289 758 -574 304 -120
    2 9 8 298 761 -571 307 -117
    8 2 9 829 930 -402 476 52
    8 9 2 892 950 -382 496 72
    9 2 8 928 961 -371 507 83
    9 8 2 982 979 -353 525 101

     

    As you study the graphs, note that the same position of 892 will yield the incorrect number of 496 as the number 862 yields the correct number of 486. Again the difference between 6 and 9 may seem slight to the viewer although the outcome is less than perfect.

    A less than perfect outcome is not acceptable and this is why more than one session should be conducted to check for any error. You will in the future see a series of postings screening for any possible error.

    The idea exists that one might observe only the numbers that match.

    Modification of the formula can yield other numbers and a pattern of sequence can be recognized once the proper entrainment, skill, and environment of the viewer is achieved.

    You are now observing a system of communication that will overcome all others presently known. It will be developed not in secrecy but here before us all.

    -Aaron C. Donahue




     

    The time now is 1730. It is Friday, May 23, 2003.

     

    ADP003/ 230503 EMD3


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    328 770 -562 316 -108
    382 788 -544 334 -90
    238 742 -590 288 -136
    283 756 -576 302 -122
    832 931 -401 477 53
    823 928 -404 474 50

     

    Drawing Results Fri. May 23, 2003: 090




     

    ADP004/ 240503 EMD3-R


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    567 846 -486 392 -32
    576 849 -483 395 -29
    657 875 -457 421 -3
    675 881 -451 427 3
    756 907 -425 453 29
    765 910 -422 456 32

     

    Here is something interesting. I am attempting to isolate within my completed data an exact number. The EMD-R postings are experimental. Now that it is the week-end holiday, why not?

     

    ADP004/ 240503 EMD3-R

     

    The next set of remote viewed numbers are 427 and 147. I will now compare these two sets with the previous number of 567.

    Note any matching numbers.


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    427 802 -530 348 -76
    472 816 -516 362 -62
    247 745 -587 291 -133
    274 753 -579 299 -125
    742 902 -430 448 24
    724 896 -436 442 18


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    147 713 -619 259 -165
    174 721 -611 267 -157
    417 799 -533 345 -79
    471 816 -516 362 -62
    714 893 -439 439 15
    741 902 -430 448 24



     




     

    Drawing Results Sat. May 24, 2003: 186



     

    The time now is 1918, Sunday, May 25, 2003.

     

    ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    453 810 -522 356 -68
    435 804 -528 350 -74
    543 839 -493 385 -39
    534 836 -496 382 -42
    345 776 -556 322 -102
    354 779 -553 325 -99

     

    This EMD3-H posting is an experiment revealing yet another way to access non-historical information.

     

    ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H,E


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    453 810 -522 356 -68
    435 804 -528 350 -74
    543 839 -493 385 -39
    534 836 -496 382 -42
    345 776 -556 322 -102
    354 779 -553 325 -99


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    42 679 -653 225 -199
    24 674 -658 220 -204
    402 794 -538 340 -84
    420 800 -532 346 -78
    204 731 -601 277 -147
    240 742 -590 288 -136


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    176 722 -610 268 -156
    167 719 -613 265 -159
    716 894 -438 440 16
    761 908 -424 454 30
    617 862 -470 408 -16
    671 880 -452 426 2

     

    A third session is cued as reference to the second being a number that is known as historical data! The implications of this are profound.



     




     

    Drawing Results Sun. May 25, 2003: 601

     

    The Winning Michigan Daily 3 numbers for the evening of Sunday, May 25, 2003 are 6,0, and 1 in this order.

     

    ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H,E

    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    453 810 -522 356 -68
    435 804 -528 350 -74
    543 839 -493 385 -39
    534 836 -496 382 -42
    345 776 -556 322 -102
    354 779 -553 325 -99

     

    A second session cued for historical data produced 042 that in turn, produced the correct number.


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    42 679 -653 225 -199
    24 674 -658 220 -204
    402 794 -538 340 -84
    420 800 -532 346 -78
    204 731 -601 277 -147
    240 742 -590 288 -136

     

    This correct number was isolated as per a third session and the number 176 reveals -160, 16, and -16. These numbers match only one number from the previous graph of numbers. This number is -601.


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    176 722 -610 268 -156
    167 719 -613 265 -159
    716 894 -438 440 16
    761 908 -424 454 30
    617 862 -470 408 -16
    671 880 -452 426 2

     

    The implications of this are profound. A number that does not yet exist can be identified and therefore limited as historical information! There is so much more to show you.

    -Aaron C. Donahue




     

    The time now is 1923, Monday, May 26, 2003.

     

    ADP006/ 260503 EMD3-H

     

    Comment:

    I have a strange set of experimental numbers today. This could mean a direct number is realized. We shall see...


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    954 970 -362 516 92
    945 967 -365 513 89
    594 855 -477 401 -23
    549 841 -491 387 -37
    495 824 -508 370 -54
    459 812 -520 358 -66


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    951 969 -363 515 91
    915 957 -375 503 79
    591 854 -478 400 -24
    519 831 -501 377 -47
    195 728 -604 274 -150
    159 717 -615 263 -161


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    851 937 -395 483 59
    815 925 -407 471 47
    581 851 -481 397 -27
    518 831 -501 377 -47
    185 725 -607 271 -153
    158 716 -616 262 -162


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    951 969 -363 515 91
    915 957 -375 503 79
    591 854 -478 400 -24
    519 831 -501 377 -47
    195 728 -604 274 -150
    159 717 -615 263 -161


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    851 937 -395 483 59
    815 925 -407 471 47
    581 851 -481 397 -27
    518 831 -501 377 -47
    185 725 -607 271 -153
    158 716 -616 262 -162


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    462 813 -519 359 -65
    426 802 -530 348 -76
    642 870 -462 416 -8
    624 865 -467 411 -13
    246 744 -588 290 -134
    264 750 -582 296 -128

     

    As I have stated, these numbers are strange. I believe that we may have a direct number from the initial session. This is why I love to experiment with the formula. There is so much to learn!


    -Aaron C. Donahue

    Drawing Results Mon. May 26, 2003: 813

     

    Whoa! The numbers are in. This EMD3-H cueing experiment produced some strange numbers worth a second look. I will try cueing this blind with another viewer to further understand what is going on here...

    The winning Michigan Daily 3 numbers for Monday, May 26, 2003 are 8,1, and 3 in this order.


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    954 970 -362 516 92
    945 967 -365 513 89
    594 855 -477 401 -23
    549 841 -491 387 -37
    495 824 -508 370 -54
    459 812 -520 358 -66


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    951 969 -363 515 91
    915 957 -375 503 79
    591 854 -478 400 -24
    519 831 -501 377 -47
    195 728 -604 274 -150
    159 717 -615 263 -161


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    851 937 -395 483 59
    815 925 -407 471 47
    581 851 -481 397 -27
    518 831 -501 377 -47
    185 725 -607 271 -153
    158 716 -616 262 -162


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    462 813 -519 359 -65
    426 802 -530 348 -76
    642 870 -462 416 -8
    624 865 -467 411 -13
    246 744 -588 290 -134
    264 750 -582 296 -128


    x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

    513 829 -503 375 -49
    531 835 -497 381 -43
    153 715 -617 261 -163
    135 709 -623 255 -169
    351 778 -554 324 -100
    315 766 -566 312 -112

     

    The numbers 462 and 513 are the result of the identical EMD3-H cueing as before. These numbers are used to isolate the correct numbers 813 and 831. Determining a correct pattern of sequence is possible with specialized cueing and a technique that I will share with you not now.

    I am pleased with the result of today's experiment.

    -Aaron C. Donahue

    kellmellus55

    kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1Standard MemberClarkston,MI
    United States
    Member #35481
    March 12, 2006
    537 Posts
    OnlinePosted: January 21, 2008, 9:26 pm - IP Logged Favorites

      Remote Viewer "Sees" Lottery Numbers Before They Are Drawn    During six consecutive days in May, Remote Viewer Aaron C. Donahue posted the winning Michigan Daily 3 lottery numbers on his Internet web site before they were drawn.  Donahue accomplished this fete not just once, but for six consecutive days between May 21 and May 26.
    He produced almost perfect number combinations except for May 22, when there was an accidental inversion of a 6 into a 9 for one of the three numbers. He said this is a common problem when looking at numbers through a technique known as remote viewing. He said things are usually seen upside down, backwards and sometimes inverted, as if looking through a mirror.2003

    0 7 5 690

      kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
      Clarkston,MI
      United States
      Member #35082
      March 12, 2006
      594 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 9, 2010, 9:35 am - IP Logged

      Pacattack started a thread about Aaron C. Donahue in March 2006. Just as you said, Mr. Dohanue claimed he was remote viewing the number to input into his PI(3.14159265358...) formula. It made for a one of the more interesting PI discussions on the LP. At the time, illustrious LP member Sfilippo, once again,  created a nice program using Donahue's PI formula. The program was great. The tricky part was trying to find the correct number to input into the program. For many of us, remote viewing was not an option. 

      Here's the link.

      http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/130050.

       

      Another interesting PI discussion among others can also be seen at this link:

      http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/130829

       

      Good Luck