New Jersey United States
Member #99,028
October 18, 2010
1,439 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Golgo13 on Apr 20, 2011
We all wish we knew what "x" was going to be boney. If your into pairs thats what makes Jersey the perfect place to play. Front pair (88x) Split pair (8x8) and Back pair (x88). Playing the same digit to show double would only cost you $1.50 minimum to play per draw. Thats just $3.00 per day. Of course the higher the investment the bigger the return.
Yeah I play pairs sometimes when I get thefeeling. Sometimes I get a wierd feeling about a number with a couple others, but rather than go for boxes I'll just play something like the 02 pair every possible way and 29 pair every possible way. Hope that one pair shows as a double, or both, but if one does, your still covered. Although you're betting more to win less, it's a much easier win.
Orange County, New York United States
Member #140
March 10, 2002
8,816 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Boney526 on Apr 20, 2011
Yeah I play pairs sometimes when I get thefeeling. Sometimes I get a wierd feeling about a number with a couple others, but rather than go for boxes I'll just play something like the 02 pair every possible way and 29 pair every possible way. Hope that one pair shows as a double, or both, but if one does, your still covered. Although you're betting more to win less, it's a much easier win.
I tried playing different numbers as pairs here in NY and didnt fair well with that. So i found a way to chart doubles where i can "chase" a hit. It might not be pinpoint precision on when that double will come out but as you can see with the 288 that showed yesterday it works. The only difference is that my charting consists of mostly first position hits. For instance lets take the double 1's. As i have been posting earlier, the double 1's (which have been stubborn in showing) are good to chase according to my charts of course. Now since i track first position hits my plays would be:
Front pair:11x
split pair: 1x1
Those would be my only plays since i am banking on the first digit to show as 1. I dont know what the payout is in NJ for a boxed hit with a double in it but in NY its $160 for a $1 boxed bet. So to play all 10 digits with the 11 pair @ .50 each would cost only $5 with a return of $80 or if played @ $1.00 each would cost $10 for a return of $160. Depending on the betters bankroll of course, You can bet higher per boxed number or you can also play less numbers with that 11 pair. What i deleted out of my habits was to play every single draw for some kind of hit. I now focus on waiting for a double to form (which i am waiting in NY for) and then i would take the money that i "would have" spent daily and use it for the chase. Sometimes there are "rougue doubles" that form which do not conform to the way i play. The 88 pair is one of them. As you saw i said to keep a watch on them to show but i did not indicate how the 8 should be used only in the first position. Rougue doubles that show on my charts can show in any position. The 33 pair is the other rogue double. The 11 pair are definite first position pick. Maybe you can catch a possible straight with them!! Anyway good luck today and i'll keep everyone posted on any forming doubles as they arise.
United States
Member #69,528
January 11, 2009
7,803 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Golgo13 on Apr 21, 2011
I tried playing different numbers as pairs here in NY and didnt fair well with that. So i found a way to chart doubles where i can "chase" a hit. It might not be pinpoint precision on when that double will come out but as you can see with the 288 that showed yesterday it works. The only difference is that my charting consists of mostly first position hits. For instance lets take the double 1's. As i have been posting earlier, the double 1's (which have been stubborn in showing) are good to chase according to my charts of course. Now since i track first position hits my plays would be:
Front pair:11x
split pair: 1x1
Those would be my only plays since i am banking on the first digit to show as 1. I dont know what the payout is in NJ for a boxed hit with a double in it but in NY its $160 for a $1 boxed bet. So to play all 10 digits with the 11 pair @ .50 each would cost only $5 with a return of $80 or if played @ $1.00 each would cost $10 for a return of $160. Depending on the betters bankroll of course, You can bet higher per boxed number or you can also play less numbers with that 11 pair. What i deleted out of my habits was to play every single draw for some kind of hit. I now focus on waiting for a double to form (which i am waiting in NY for) and then i would take the money that i "would have" spent daily and use it for the chase. Sometimes there are "rougue doubles" that form which do not conform to the way i play. The 88 pair is one of them. As you saw i said to keep a watch on them to show but i did not indicate how the 8 should be used only in the first position. Rougue doubles that show on my charts can show in any position. The 33 pair is the other rogue double. The 11 pair are definite first position pick. Maybe you can catch a possible straight with them!! Anyway good luck today and i'll keep everyone posted on any forming doubles as they arise.
Your assumption about plotting doubles/pairs/combinations is flawed/inaccurate.
This kind of strategy often leads players to financial ruin plus it has nothing to do with statistical analysis.
Here is why : there really is no way to plot doubles or otherwise simply because of hidden data in the form of pre-draws..most combinations that people feel are missing have already hit giving the player a false sense of security in placing their future bet.
Time and time Ive tried to explain to people that there are no missing elements nor do they figure in on future events but the amount of false information and brainwashing that goes on in this site by uneducated/unknowing players has taken its toll.
Think of this simple explanation : your odds of hitting at pick3 are "NOT" 1/1000 as most state lotto websites display.... they are only 1/1000 "IF" you play 1000 combinations whereby you'd only win 500 dollars.The degree of certainty can go past 4000 draws to achieve a 95% hit rate for a single played straight combination.
Orange County, New York United States
Member #140
March 10, 2002
8,816 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by crow on Apr 21, 2011
Your assumption about plotting doubles/pairs/combinations is flawed/inaccurate.
This kind of strategy often leads players to financial ruin plus it has nothing to do with statistical analysis.
Here is why : there really is no way to plot doubles or otherwise simply because of hidden data in the form of pre-draws..most combinations that people feel are missing have already hit giving the player a false sense of security in placing their future bet.
Time and time Ive tried to explain to people that there are no missing elements nor do they figure in on future events but the amount of false information and brainwashing that goes on in this site by uneducated/unknowing players has taken its toll.
Think of this simple explanation : your odds of hitting at pick3 are "NOT" 1/1000 as most state lotto websites display.... they are only 1/1000 "IF" you play 1000 combinations whereby you'd only win 500 dollars.The degree of certainty can go past 4000 draws to achieve a 95% hit rate for a single played straight combination.
I dont know what to make of this post.
Your assumption about plotting doubles/pairs/combinations is flawed/inaccurate.
Its an assumption on my part in what trend i see happening. Flawed/inaccurate? Sure, could be or i could be like that other predictor dropping winners "every" drawing. Hmmm whats the name??? Well i'll let you figure that one out.
This kind of strategy often leads players to financial ruin plus it has nothing to do with statistical analysis.
Financial ruin? Now i'm guessing your talking over a period of time. I'm not one for blowing your whole paycheck in numbers or gambling in general. If a person feels that $3 a day (if pairs are only being played) will put them in "financial ruin" then they should not be playing anything. Statistical analysis? Well you could be right with that. I'm strictly a pen and graph paper person but who's to say that the info that i put into my charts wont produce? Hmmm thats what i'll call it...info analysis!
Here is why : there really is no way to plot doubles or otherwise simply because of hidden data in the form of pre-draws..most combinations that people feel are missing have already hit giving the player a false sense of security in placing their future bet.
I know there are hidden pre-draw data flying around but to me i really dont care about it, just what i can see. I'm not worried about missing combinations just the ones that i see forming in my charts.
Time and time Ive tried to explain to people that there are no missing elements nor do they figure in on future events but the amount of false information and brainwashing that goes on in this site by uneducated/unknowing players has taken its toll.
Listen to me crow, I understand exactly what you mean in the above statement but what you fail to understand is that people "can" try to make a difference in here whether its to your liking or not. Its up to the rest of us to decide if that persons knowledge of the game is up to par. Just do your thing and let everyone else do theirs. Members will just simply scroll past the post that they do not want to read and head straight towards yours for the info that they need. Now i see that you had the midday 984...good call!
New Jersey United States
Member #99,028
October 18, 2010
1,439 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by brels on Apr 22, 2011
Hey Boney whats going on? Where is Crow Calab?
It is the holiday day weekend maybe thats it?
Brels
No idea, didn't even realize it was a holiday. I got Friday's off, and I'd imagine most people don't.
Anyway, here's what I got for tonight.
24x
26x
27x
46x
47x
67x
Although it might just change up on me tonight. I only played 526 S/b x3 and 078 box once. But I'd look at 47. Actually I think all of those have shown up recently. It doesn't mean they won't again, but I'm just saying.