Texas United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,223 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by truecritic on Apr 10, 2011
One finds it easy to believe you are telling the truth about being paid for your posts - they really don't add anything to the thread. Normally I read about a paragraph and skip to the next poster. Will you still get paid, if I don't read them?
Yeah, I quit reading that garyo guys posts too! He sounds like one of those people who eat oatmeal because Wilford Brimley said it was good.
Hey here's a cool picture for you. When Jimbooble-looble gets back he's giong to answer why this is a bad set of numbers, why one should never play them, how long it would take before someone could reasonably expect these to hit, and 18 septillion other question you never knew you had.
If you didn't make paragraph two, just look at the pretty picture.
Texas United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,223 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Apr 10, 2011
Congratulations! To someone? Maybe?
A winner in the TX Cash 5 on March 5, 2011,
drawn at 10:12 PM Central Time?
Which time zone was that 10:55 time stamp made in?
Your LP profiles say both you and RL are in Central.
It would help to know this so one might speculate
on just what your pretty picture is trying to announce.
Of course, it really doesn't matter much anyway, does it?
Thanks Jimmy. Nobody won.
The camera is a Nikon Coolpix L19, 8 megapixel. Time is 24 hour mode.
The computer is a Compaq, circa 2003, maxed out in upgrades, passed between me and my son, as needed, more time than the warranty allows. It's the only machine he ever used that he couldn't destroy. Silly machine is still running on it's second monitor, an old CRT gaming screen. It's a lucky machine maybe.
No complaints. Didn't play it. The intent was there. The emotions were high.
Then you keep looking at it and find all the reasons it would be a stupid pick.
Three 9s? Not likely.
The only number with that set up? No way.
Spacing don't look right. Uh-huh.
There are a lot more ways to talk yourself OUT of jackpot, than talk your way into one.
United States
Member #93,943
July 10, 2010
2,180 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Apr 10, 2011
Thanks Jimmy. Nobody won.
The camera is a Nikon Coolpix L19, 8 megapixel. Time is 24 hour mode.
The computer is a Compaq, circa 2003, maxed out in upgrades, passed between me and my son, as needed, more time than the warranty allows. It's the only machine he ever used that he couldn't destroy. Silly machine is still running on it's second monitor, an old CRT gaming screen. It's a lucky machine maybe.
No complaints. Didn't play it. The intent was there. The emotions were high.
Then you keep looking at it and find all the reasons it would be a stupid pick.
Three 9s? Not likely.
The only number with that set up? No way.
Spacing don't look right. Uh-huh.
There are a lot more ways to talk yourself OUT of jackpot, than talk your way into one.
In this case there were at least 914181929.
Screwed up, didn't you?
Pathetic...
Jimmy4164wondered, "Congratulations! To someone? Maybe?
A winner in the TX Cash 5 on March 5, 2011,
drawn at 10:12 PM Central Time?
Which time zone was that 10:55 time stamp made in?
Your LP profiles say both you and RL are in Central.
It would help to know this so one might speculate
on just what your pretty picture is trying to announce.
Of course, it really doesn't matter much anyway, does it?"
United States
Member #93,943
July 10, 2010
2,180 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by mayhem on Apr 10, 2011
Is someone trying to say they predicted a cash 5 jackpot?
They thought the TX Cash 5 Lotto was drawn at 11:00 pm so they timestamped what looks like a prediction in RL's program at 10:55. The drawing was at 10:12! garyo1954 tried to explain with some mundane story about a computer...
see above...
I'm sure they're working at this moment on a cover story.
I'm getting sick of this business. There is an old saying that I've found to be true over many years. When you have trouble figuring out what's motivating someone when they don't say what it is, just, "follow the money!"
Our old buddy Robert Perkis (Lotto-Logix) is back on the prowl - did you notice?
United States
Member #59,352
March 13, 2008
5,626 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Apr 10, 2011
They thought the TX Cash 5 Lotto was drawn at 11:00 pm so they timestamped what looks like a prediction in RL's program at 10:55. The drawing was at 10:12! garyo1954 tried to explain with some mundane story about a computer...
see above...
I'm sure they're working at this moment on a cover story.
I'm getting sick of this business. There is an old saying that I've found to be true over many years. When you have trouble figuring out what's motivating someone when they don't say what it is, just, "follow the money!"
Our old buddy Robert Perkis (Lotto-Logix) is back on the prowl - did you notice?
Jimbo
Gary and I have not cooked up some sort of plan to team up on you, are you getting paranoid.
I like Gary and love it when he he gives you a hard time but sorry there is no conspiracy at least not
any that I am aware of. I think he is just doing a anti-jimbo imitation for our entertainment. I also would
think that he done the time thing on purpose just to get you going, I think he is a little smarter then that.
United States
Member #93,943
July 10, 2010
2,180 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Apr 10, 2011
Jimbo
Gary and I have not cooked up some sort of plan to team up on you, are you getting paranoid.
I like Gary and love it when he he gives you a hard time but sorry there is no conspiracy at least not
any that I am aware of. I think he is just doing a anti-jimbo imitation for our entertainment. I also would
think that he done the time thing on purpose just to get you going, I think he is a little smarter then that.
RL
I thought you'd come up with something better than this, but then, I keep overestimating your capabilities. Interesting how you feel compelled to intervene in an exchange between me and garyo1954.
United States
Member #59,352
March 13, 2008
5,626 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Apr 10, 2011
I thought you'd come up with something better than this, but then, I keep overestimating your capabilities. Interesting how you feel compelled to intervene in an exchange between me and garyo1954.
Denver, Co United States
Member #103,042
December 29, 2010
547 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Apr 10, 2011
They thought the TX Cash 5 Lotto was drawn at 11:00 pm so they timestamped what looks like a prediction in RL's program at 10:55. The drawing was at 10:12! garyo1954 tried to explain with some mundane story about a computer...
see above...
I'm sure they're working at this moment on a cover story.
I'm getting sick of this business. There is an old saying that I've found to be true over many years. When you have trouble figuring out what's motivating someone when they don't say what it is, just, "follow the money!"
Our old buddy Robert Perkis (Lotto-Logix) is back on the prowl - did you notice?
"Our old buddy Robert Perkis (Lotto-Logix) is back on the prowl - did you notice?"
Jimmy...is there something about this that we should be wary of?
Texas United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,223 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Apr 10, 2011
They thought the TX Cash 5 Lotto was drawn at 11:00 pm so they timestamped what looks like a prediction in RL's program at 10:55. The drawing was at 10:12! garyo1954 tried to explain with some mundane story about a computer...
see above...
I'm sure they're working at this moment on a cover story.
I'm getting sick of this business. There is an old saying that I've found to be true over many years. When you have trouble figuring out what's motivating someone when they don't say what it is, just, "follow the money!"
Our old buddy Robert Perkis (Lotto-Logix) is back on the prowl - did you notice?
Jimboo-boo!!!!!!
RL has told you the truth. There isno conspiracyamong the people who talk off board. RL and I share some common ideas about jackpot games in which he has been more than willing to assist. I've stated in the past that I don't play Cash 5, never bought a ticket for it, and that's the truth.
The story about the old computer? Entirely true. The old XP machine is used to crunch data. Not connected to the internet. I also have a laptop with Vista, which I truly hate, and this Win7 machine which I bought while my son had the old Compaq after burning up his gaming machine. When he got a new gaming machine, I got the Compaq back. It's an SR1103WM with a 20" CyberVision CRT. The camera is a Nikon Coolpix L19, 24 hour mode camera.
Let's go back to PAGE 1 where Jimmy says:
"Another way to state your observation is to say,"Anyone who would accept the results (of a Monte Carlo simulation) didn't need to see it in the first place, and all those who need to see the results, would not accept them!""
Now, Jimboo-boo, I gave you a picture of the data. From that, you concocted a conspiracy(?), and that the data was WRONG!
Why didn't you accept it? There was no claim to win, no claim that that was a date/time stamp. With absolutely no claims made, your mind worked to make the data you saw fit in your perception. You went so far as to attempt a manipulation of the time and time zone to explain what you wanted to see. Why?