Hey bigdsing and everyone...ok this is getting really effin' exciting! After watching these patterns, it seems the same combo produced the EXACT pattern hit, being that the 003 (300) is showing in three places, then all we had to do was play just THREE numbers for a straight hit OFF of the same combo...that being said, following that same exact pattern is showing 289 to hit tomorrow night! (Put it in midday is ALWAYS a good move in this NY game, been burned once too many times, but if no show in midday or just catch a pair especially if say it comes in 98X in mid, might be a good way to anticipate it as well)...lookie here...
3 3 0 1 1 3 3 4 9 5
9 4 5 4 0 1 2 1 6 7
6 9 8 2 9 9 8 6 5 0
5 5 2 5 5 0 0 3 1 9
0 2 1 7 3 8 5 9 2 1
1 0 3 3 2 5 6 0 7 6
4 7 9 8 7 7 9 7 3 2
8 6 4 9 8 6 1 8 8 3
2 1 7 6 4 2 7 5 4 8
7 8 6 0 6 4 4 2 0 4
3 3 0 1 1 3 3 4 9 5
9 4 5 4 0 1 2 1 6 7
At the bottom you can see the 003-451 where it is a 'downward reversed pattern' JUST like the 300-582! (The top of the chart only the 451 is visible, notice the bottom two rows are the top two as i believe numbers are 'linear', meaning they are linked like a chain)...Now, the differnce is only in the configuration, in the 300-582 the front pair is slanted and with 003 it is horizontal. This affects it somewhat since, with 582 the last digit is leading off the next draw, to do that now would change the pattern altogether, so what I did was to do what I would have done then which was to follow the exact pattern and go with 756 which just missed and brought 256. In this pattern now, that would be 489 and therefore go with 289 or both for safety of course, but since it is altered b (geometrically different), does that mean to reverse it and go with 103? Well, that is what we don't know for sure as of yet. I guess to throw that in wouldn't be a bad idea, since that gives us only three numbers but in my experience, when the new pattern arrives tomorrow we shall see what happened. I am throwing caution to this because of those variable unknowns at this time. Seems logical to me that 103 should be favored, since it is a much more active pair recently, BUT cannot throw out the X89 either. We've had 69-79 on backpairs so why not 89? It can go either way or it could also break. Your call. If you have any advice here, do not hesitate to holler!