Dallas, Texas United States Member #4549 May 2, 2004 1720 Posts Offline

Posted: February 3, 2012, 4:08 pm - IP Logged

Based on the short term it would be easy to total each category and divide by the number of draws.

Random being, well, random, gives you only a 10% chance of any number in a given position.

However, a number going higher or lower, or staying the same, depends on the number. If the number is 7, then you have a 70% chance (0,1,2,3,4,5,6) it will go low, a 10% chance (7) it remains the same and a 20% chance (8,9) that it will go higher.

Depending on the number of draws, the biggest drawback is the 'bulge' on the low digit totals. This is Texas Evening:

The reason you have a disparity is 40% of the total is designated as Low, (0,1,2,3) versus 4,5,6 and 7,8,9.

Might be an interesting idea to see how the other categories do as well.

United States Member #73037 April 3, 2009 147 Posts Offline

Posted: February 4, 2012, 11:12 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on February 3, 2012

Based on the short term it would be easy to total each category and divide by the number of draws.

Random being, well, random, gives you only a 10% chance of any number in a given position.

However, a number going higher or lower, or staying the same, depends on the number. If the number is 7, then you have a 70% chance (0,1,2,3,4,5,6) it will go low, a 10% chance (7) it remains the same and a 20% chance (8,9) that it will go higher.

Depending on the number of draws, the biggest drawback is the 'bulge' on the low digit totals. This is Texas Evening:

The reason you have a disparity is 40% of the total is designated as Low, (0,1,2,3) versus 4,5,6 and 7,8,9.

Might be an interesting idea to see how the other categories do as well.

Good Luck!

Evening garyo1954,

Sorry not to have gotten back sooner...

Below is my Texas Pick 3 Day game. According to my records, it has 1325 games in it since the last matrix changed on Nov. 12, 2007.

TOTAL DRAWS - COLUMN COUNT - NUMBER FREQUENCY and PERCENTAGE CHART

Column Counts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1st Column Count Number Frequency

140

134

111

120

144

145

139

112

151

129

Percentage for 1st Column Count

10.57%

10.11%

8.38%

9.06%

10.87%

10.94%

10.49%

8.45%

11.40%

9.74%

2nd Column Count Number Frequency

136

115

135

124

144

133

119

121

138

160

Percentage for 2nd Column Count

10.26%

8.68%

10.19%

9.36%

10.87%

10.04%

8.98%

9.13%

10.42%

12.08%

3rd Column Count Number Frequency

134

153

130

140

143

110

120

137

129

129

Percentage for 3rd Column Count

10.11%

11.55%

9.81%

10.57%

10.79%

8.30%

9.06%

10.34%

9.74%

9.74%

According to my table, in the 1st column, the number 8 has hit the most times. In the 2nd column, the number 9 has hit the most. And in the 3rd column, the number 1 is the winner. Playing the "most hits" (8 9 1) doesn't work. That's why I'm looking for another why to analyze the numbers...

Based on the above table, I can see which number has hit the most times in which position. I was attempting to figure out how to use the "probability" functions to see if a different number popped to the surface other than what is apparent in the table. As for the 10% figure verses the 40% figure, if I understand correctly, each number has a 10% chance of being drawn (random). As to the L, M, H - it's just the catagories I placed the numbers into. I find it easier to grasp this way when I'm looking at the "historical table" draws.

Is there a formula that provides the type of info I'm looking for OR would it be some sort of VBA script?

By the way, which program are you using that provides a printout like you've shown?

Thanks very much for the reply.

The only DUMB question is the one question you DID NOT ask...

Dallas, Texas United States Member #4549 May 2, 2004 1720 Posts Offline

Posted: February 5, 2012, 12:52 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by KnuckleHead on February 4, 2012

Evening garyo1954,

Sorry not to have gotten back sooner...

Below is my Texas Pick 3 Day game. According to my records, it has 1325 games in it since the last matrix changed on Nov. 12, 2007.

TOTAL DRAWS - COLUMN COUNT - NUMBER FREQUENCY and PERCENTAGE CHART

Column Counts

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1st Column Count Number Frequency

140

134

111

120

144

145

139

112

151

129

Percentage for 1st Column Count

10.57%

10.11%

8.38%

9.06%

10.87%

10.94%

10.49%

8.45%

11.40%

9.74%

2nd Column Count Number Frequency

136

115

135

124

144

133

119

121

138

160

Percentage for 2nd Column Count

10.26%

8.68%

10.19%

9.36%

10.87%

10.04%

8.98%

9.13%

10.42%

12.08%

3rd Column Count Number Frequency

134

153

130

140

143

110

120

137

129

129

Percentage for 3rd Column Count

10.11%

11.55%

9.81%

10.57%

10.79%

8.30%

9.06%

10.34%

9.74%

9.74%

According to my table, in the 1st column, the number 8 has hit the most times. In the 2nd column, the number 9 has hit the most. And in the 3rd column, the number 1 is the winner. Playing the "most hits" (8 9 1) doesn't work. That's why I'm looking for another why to analyze the numbers...

Based on the above table, I can see which number has hit the most times in which position. I was attempting to figure out how to use the "probability" functions to see if a different number popped to the surface other than what is apparent in the table. As for the 10% figure verses the 40% figure, if I understand correctly, each number has a 10% chance of being drawn (random). As to the L, M, H - it's just the catagories I placed the numbers into. I find it easier to grasp this way when I'm looking at the "historical table" draws.

Is there a formula that provides the type of info I'm looking for OR would it be some sort of VBA script?

By the way, which program are you using that provides a printout like you've shown?

Thanks very much for the reply.

The people who have studied gambling theory would be better suited to answer the formula question. In my opinion, the formula you are looking for depends on how you see the lottery drawings.

1) Are they all independent and random?

2) When a digit hits, does this increase the probability of it hitting again?

3) When a digit hits, does this decrease the probability of it hitting again?

There are good and valid reasons on all sides. For example one could use the idea that 62% of the draws contain one digit from the draw before to validate the idea that those balls have a greater chance of hitting. On the other hand, that doesn't mean it is going to ber the first number. And don't forget each digit will hit on average every third draw.

So how do you see it?

The program I used is a personal ditty I've used for years. It is simple so I can add a few lines to get a fast answer.

United States Member #73037 April 3, 2009 147 Posts Offline

Posted: February 5, 2012, 4:39 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on February 5, 2012

The people who have studied gambling theory would be better suited to answer the formula question. In my opinion, the formula you are looking for depends on how you see the lottery drawings.

1) Are they all independent and random?

2) When a digit hits, does this increase the probability of it hitting again?

3) When a digit hits, does this decrease the probability of it hitting again?

There are good and valid reasons on all sides. For example one could use the idea that 62% of the draws contain one digit from the draw before to validate the idea that those balls have a greater chance of hitting. On the other hand, that doesn't mean it is going to ber the first number. And don't forget each digit will hit on average every third draw.

So how do you see it?

The program I used is a personal ditty I've used for years. It is simple so I can add a few lines to get a fast answer.

Afternoon garyo1954,

To answer your questions...

1) Since PowerBall, Mega Millions, and the Texas Lottery use some sort of "ball" machines and not "RGN" programs, then yes, I believe that each draw is independent and random.

2) and 3) Based on answer 1), I don't see how it could "increase" OR decrease the probability if the draws are truly random.

Therefore, is it possible to "track" the historical draw data to get an idea of the ball positions as they've hit in the past. Yes, the draws are random, but...., is there a way to track the hit positions in a column for each draw thereby producing a "probability" for each number based on the historical position hits? Some sort of formula/Vba that could track positions would probably produce a better chance on a "RGN" style game because with enough draws, it may be able to see the patterns produced in an "RGN" program.

Your correct, this subject is definitely for a "gambling theorist", and once this could be figured out, a very good programmer... (of which I'm not either).

Thank you for the lively discussion. It provides me with different ideas to search for and to think about.

The only DUMB question is the one question you DID NOT ask...

Dallas, Texas United States Member #4549 May 2, 2004 1720 Posts Offline

Posted: February 6, 2012, 5:43 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by KnuckleHead on February 5, 2012

Afternoon garyo1954,

To answer your questions...

1) Since PowerBall, Mega Millions, and the Texas Lottery use some sort of "ball" machines and not "RGN" programs, then yes, I believe that each draw is independent and random.

2) and 3) Based on answer 1), I don't see how it could "increase" OR decrease the probability if the draws are truly random.

Therefore, is it possible to "track" the historical draw data to get an idea of the ball positions as they've hit in the past. Yes, the draws are random, but...., is there a way to track the hit positions in a column for each draw thereby producing a "probability" for each number based on the historical position hits? Some sort of formula/Vba that could track positions would probably produce a better chance on a "RGN" style game because with enough draws, it may be able to see the patterns produced in an "RGN" program.

Your correct, this subject is definitely for a "gambling theorist", and once this could be figured out, a very good programmer... (of which I'm not either).

Thank you for the lively discussion. It provides me with different ideas to search for and to think about.

I am a big fan of historical data. I tend to use it mostly as a baseline while tracking recent trends.

I might have something that would help. I post it later this evening when I get a chance to find the program and do an update.

Dallas, Texas United States Member #4549 May 2, 2004 1720 Posts Offline

Posted: February 6, 2012, 10:26 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by KnuckleHead on February 6, 2012

Afternoon garyo1954,

That's what I'm attempting to figure out, "trends". How to construct formulas or subs/scripts for... "trends" in the data.

Anything can be counted, but what good is having all this historical data if you don't know how to put it all together and analyze it properly?

Thank you. KH

Can't find the stuff on this machine.

But this is along the idea:

Top part is the overall breakdown of repeating digits - First digit repeats back to first position 285 times, it moves to the second position 240, and moves to the third 234. Reads the same for the second and third digits.

Bottom of the chart shows how many times the digit in each position remains the same, goes lower, or goes higher. But you might be better served to use a chart like this that shows the change on a draw to draw basis.

I don't know. Maybe (hint-hint) WIN D has an idea??

NASHVILLE, TENN United States Member #33372 February 20, 2006 1044 Posts Offline

Posted: February 11, 2012, 1:59 pm - IP Logged

Quote: Originally posted by KnuckleHead on February 6, 2012

Afternoon garyo1954,

That's what I'm attempting to figure out, "trends". How to construct formulas or subs/scripts for... "trends" in the data.

Anything can be counted, but what good is having all this historical data if you don't know how to put it all together and analyze it properly?

Thank you. KH

KnucklyHead

You are dealing with random here. You are leaving the world of probabilities. There is no mathematical proof of anything while you are vacationing in the realm of random. Therefore, anything you may think or say can not be proven nor disproven.

Having said this, you must make decisions as you see them. Does a drawn number have a better chance of being drawn in the next drawing or less of a chance? Makes no difference. You must make a determination and then stick with it.

If the last 5 numbers drawn resulted in an odd sum, will the next drawing result in an even sum? Again, makes no difference. You must make a determination and then stick with it.

As for me, I see no advantage in determining trends. Trends come and go. That's why they are called trends. Usually if you have enough data to indicate a trend, you also have enough time passed to neutralize that trend. I have made my decision and I am sticking to it.

bgonÃ§alves Brasil Member #92564 June 9, 2010 2125 Posts Offline

Posted: February 11, 2012, 4:51 pm - IP Logged

Hello,knuckl,soyoucan use0,1,2,3= highAverage=4.56,7,8,9= high,To sortthe endings,ok!Thebig problem asgasmuspeak,are the trendsand repetitionsof a resultto another, becauseoneis projected toresult,(single event), makingimpossible anypredictionfor the wholeof the draw, sincehalfif you canpredict,forexamplealotto49/63-4numberscan be predictedwith confidence, thenwe have totackle is theprediction ofhalf ofalottery,The other part israndom,a lotterycansee example49/6a 100playingcards,you hitnumbers3-4pretty easy,thisis the way

United States Member #73037 April 3, 2009 147 Posts Offline

Posted: February 12, 2012, 8:55 pm - IP Logged

Evening all,

Reading the last 2 posts, I have to admit that I understand that the draws are "random". I track the Texas, Power-Ball, and Mega Millions games. I've watched the videos of the balls come out of the ball machines. But, without enough historical data to analyze, it appears that specific balls react differently based on the historical data. That's what I'm attempting to figure out how to analyze. Just because a table contains ball numbers with their associated draw numbers in it for a specific time period doesn't mean that those calculations by themselves are enough data to feel confident on the next drawn numbers. My experience has shown me that my data is incomplete and needs different and more intense analyzation.

That's what this post is all about... Understanding different types of analyzation concepts.

So, if anyone is interested/willing to share/discuss some of their different ideas with a "non-math geek" and a very "inexperienced" VBA creator, I'd be more than willing to attempt to comprehend/understand new ideas...

Thanks to all that have replied and to those that have taken the time to read this post. Hopefully, new ideas can be created...

The only DUMB question is the one question you DID NOT ask...

Your statement of: "I don't play pick 3, the payout is low.", is very understandable.

It would appear that from your point of view, "low pay out" games are a waste of time. This is also understandable.

From my point of view, attempting to comprehend different theories of probabilities and combinations, then attempting to figure out how to create the program language to implement an idea, it's much easier to work with a smaller number pool. That being stated, I still attempt to apply what I've learned with the Pick 3 game to the other games I track. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't...

But here's the difference, if my strange theories pan out, it's a littlemoney in the pocket instead of no money in the pocket.

Which is more valuable, an empty pocket or a little in the pocket while you continue to test different theories?

I thank you very much for your reply, it's showing me that there's still interest in this post and that has got members thinking... This is good... Thank you.

The only DUMB question is the one question you DID NOT ask...

Economy class Belgium Member #123700 February 27, 2012 4035 Posts Offline

Posted: March 17, 2012, 8:25 pm - IP Logged

I analysed some of pick 3 and noticed that if things would go well, you would pay a lot of tickets and you would get just a bit over break even. If the case doesn't come out, you lose big money.

The only interest that I had in pick 3 is working out odds and tables in Excel.

Again, if I consider that you could win a pick 3 by some method, get break even consistently, then you might double your money at roulette. That I would do!

Technical problems like wheeling can be solved. Printing on the tickets is also possible, if you can handle the settings and the stinky printer.

The main part is the picking of the numbers and getting a payout that is higher than all the money that you put into the tickets. If you have a sure way to win, I gather the cash to play. For pick 3, for a dollar input, you would need to win a bit more than three times in thousand to make 50% net winnings. The more you spend, the more you must win.

I might work out probabilities, but I really don't believe in that one.