New York United States
Member #83,024
November 27, 2009
2,260 Posts
Offline
Problem with this system (and many others) is there are too many numbers to play, who can afford it. I am getting frustrated, always feel like the answers are just out of reach.
Be kind, because everyone you meet is fighting a great battle.
Florida United States
Member #66,573
October 30, 2008
3,547 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by ranman17 on Feb 27, 2013
Problem with this system (and many others) is there are too many numbers to play, who can afford it. I am getting frustrated, always feel like the answers are just out of reach.
I hear ya on that .. If I could get paid for the time spent testing methods and systems, I would be way RICH lol
But its a hobby and I enjoy the challenge .
Just have to know when to play and when to sit out .
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,881 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by ranman17 on Feb 27, 2013
Problem with this system (and many others) is there are too many numbers to play, who can afford it. I am getting frustrated, always feel like the answers are just out of reach.
A good way to follow your game is to use paruths program on his homepage. It shows the roots due ,pairs, sums etc. Write down a record of this and go back one week and find the hot pairs and due pairs. The due roots and pairs will slowly hit one by one. For example root 6 was due recently and 51 hit the previous week so, as a result, 510=6 hit. Root 7 was low and hit last night as 016 in NM. I follow the sums also. Tonight I'm using a recent pair 77 for one of my picks 777 because the sum 21 is due and inversely the sum 12 has hit more than once in the past week.
I'm sitting here listening to Merle Haggard sipping some coffee!
United States
Member #14
November 9, 2001
31,614 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lottolaughs on Jan 6, 2013
Ahhh....nothing like a lazy Sunday afternoon. Some snacks, a little football and the recliner :) Yes, a might early for the Super Bowl but thought I'd get a head start with the festivities!
New Pick 3 system tryout for those inclined.
You know the drill....start with your last Evening Draw.
These numbers would be good for a month,at least.
For example: 013
Add +344, 444 and 544 using lottery math.
013 + 013 + 013 +
344 = 444 = 544 =
------- -------- --------
357 457 557
Now to these you'll want to MIRROR just the first digits.
357 857
457 957
557 057
Next step is to reverse the BACK PAIRS of all.
357 = 375 857 = 875
457 = 475 957 = 975
557 = 575 057 = 075
Now we're left with 12 numbers.
357 375 857 875
457 475 957 975
557 575 057 075
But we know how old Mr Lottery is....he can be a fickle thing.
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by ranman17 on Feb 27, 2013
Problem with this system (and many others) is there are too many numbers to play, who can afford it. I am getting frustrated, always feel like the answers are just out of reach.
'Problem with this system (and many others) is there are too many numbers to play, who can afford it'.
The above statement says it all, I think most system works, is the lack of clear waging strategy that is missing.
Waging many picks infers lack of certainty either in the system or method of selecting your picks. Considering the Random factor will enhance one's intuition and final selection, the random factor reduces your picks, the random factor keeps you within a certain time frame, persistent is part of this Random factor and finally the random factor keeps you within BUDGET.
New York United States
Member #83,024
November 27, 2009
2,260 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Mar 1, 2013
'Problem with this system (and many others) is there are too many numbers to play, who can afford it'.
The above statement says it all, I think most system works, is the lack of clear waging strategy that is missing.
Waging many picks infers lack of certainty either in the system or method of selecting your picks. Considering the Random factor will enhance one's intuition and final selection, the random factor reduces your picks, the random factor keeps you within a certain time frame, persistent is part of this Random factor and finally the random factor keeps you within BUDGET.
Can you explain this random factor and how it reduces your picks, keeps you within a certain time frame and keeps you within a budget? This would be the answer we have all been looking for.
Be kind, because everyone you meet is fighting a great battle.
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by ranman17 on Mar 1, 2013
Can you explain this random factor and how it reduces your picks, keeps you within a certain time frame and keeps you within a budget? This would be the answer we have all been looking for.
The Random factor is not a concept, the name says it all. Why do a system work when you 'Backtest it', but falls short on actual results?. Most of system derivatives or methods is based on Historical Data, which is flawed(It works post-results and not much on predictions). I think the best approach will be to ' Trigger a section of the POOL(0-9)', by whatever parameter/s you are using, this trigger should be on recent data. Let say I have a draw of 374 , based on chosen trigger, the draw 374 is going to give a Section of the Pool to consider, hence my probability is more on a SECTION at moment.( be mindful that probability is fluid concept based on data at hand). Let's use below data to explain the Above: say I have the draw 866, my triggers indicates a section 677(67) and 288(28), a draw 669 indicates 466(46), 211(21), a draw 316 indicates 94, 642, a draw 120 indicates 52,453, a draw 442 indicates 775(75), 885(85), a draw 523 indicates sections 159 or 756 , draw 400 indicates sections 722(72),833(83) , a draw 803 indicates 36 or 329. Now lets tabulate this data:
Draw Section to consider
866 677(67) or 288 (28)
699 466(46) or 211 (21)
316 94, 642
120 52, 453
442 775(75), 885(85)
523 159 or 756
400 722(72) or 833(83)
803 36 or 329
Now if the sections triggered is persistent with your state, then focus on section at MOMENT(bet for x time frame). I may decide to choose to fix my x digits as 0,1,2 or 0- highest digit of section, my concern is my sections.
New York United States
Member #83,024
November 27, 2009
2,260 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Mar 1, 2013
The Random factor is not a concept, the name says it all. Why do a system work when you 'Backtest it', but falls short on actual results?. Most of system derivatives or methods is based on Historical Data, which is flawed(It works post-results and not much on predictions). I think the best approach will be to ' Trigger a section of the POOL(0-9)', by whatever parameter/s you are using, this trigger should be on recent data. Let say I have a draw of 374 , based on chosen trigger, the draw 374 is going to give a Section of the Pool to consider, hence my probability is more on a SECTION at moment.( be mindful that probability is fluid concept based on data at hand). Let's use below data to explain the Above: say I have the draw 866, my triggers indicates a section 677(67) and 288(28), a draw 669 indicates 466(46), 211(21), a draw 316 indicates 94, 642, a draw 120 indicates 52,453, a draw 442 indicates 775(75), 885(85), a draw 523 indicates sections 159 or 756 , draw 400 indicates sections 722(72),833(83) , a draw 803 indicates 36 or 329. Now lets tabulate this data:
Draw Section to consider
866 677(67) or 288 (28)
699 466(46) or 211 (21)
316 94, 642
120 52, 453
442 775(75), 885(85)
523 159 or 756
400 722(72) or 833(83)
803 36 or 329
Now if the sections triggered is persistent with your state, then focus on section at MOMENT(bet for x time frame). I may decide to choose to fix my x digits as 0,1,2 or 0- highest digit of section, my concern is my sections.
Are you saying that the llink you posted here will work for any state or that I will have to figure out my own doubles chart? Also, your doubles chart does not address singles like the 523 above so where did you get the 159 or 756 for the 123, do you have a chart for singles?
in regfards to the x digit, I assume that you are talking about using an x digit when your method produces a pair to be played and then you are saying that you may limit the x digit to 0,1,2 or 0- highest digit of section. What are your sections section?
I ask all of these questions because I think you are onto something and I want to see if I can mary what you have here with one or more of my systems/rundowns.
Thanks for the help,
ranman
Be kind, because everyone you meet is fighting a great battle.
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by ranman17 on Mar 1, 2013
Are you saying that the llink you posted here will work for any state or that I will have to figure out my own doubles chart? Also, your doubles chart does not address singles like the 523 above so where did you get the 159 or 756 for the 123, do you have a chart for singles?
in regfards to the x digit, I assume that you are talking about using an x digit when your method produces a pair to be played and then you are saying that you may limit the x digit to 0,1,2 or 0- highest digit of section. What are your sections section?
I ask all of these questions because I think you are onto something and I want to see if I can mary what you have here with one or more of my systems/rundowns.
Thanks for the help,
ranman
All am saying is your draw set should trigger a SECTION of a the POOL, this is where your focus should be, so if assumed recent draw set is 123 and my system triggers 211, then the section to consider is 211 and all my odds is on 211. The pool members are not arranged sequentially 01234.........9, when the event is bound to occur.You may call that section a Base, a SUB. You're betting your odds on these Sections instead of the big section (0-9). Now , the posed question should be ' how effective and frequent are these triggered sections?'. Randomness should be a component of the method to generate these sections. check this link https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/256775.
FL data
Fri, Mar 1, 2013
2-0-4
1-8-6-9
Thu, Feb 28, 2013
8-0-3
7-9-1
6-1-5-2
7-0-5-9
Wed, Feb 27, 2013
4-0-0
8-9-5
5-3-0-8
9-8-5-2
Tue, Feb 26, 2013
5-2-3
1-4-7
1-8-0-9
2-7-6-2
Mon, Feb 25, 2013
4-4-2
6-1-0
5-8-7-7
1-5-9-5
Sun, Feb 24, 2013
1-2-0
3-1-9
5-3-5-9
6-9-6-2
Sat, Feb 23, 2013
3-1-6
4-3-6
8-1-8-2
4-8-7-4
Fri, Feb 22, 2013
6-9-9
1-9-5
8-5-1-3
4-2-9-0
Thu, Feb 21, 2013
8-6-6
2-8-2
2-1-2-7
2-4-3-1
Wed, Feb 20, 2013
3-7-4
2-1-3
5-5-8-7
4-3-0-6
Using the above link, I can generate Sections/Base for my picks(test it).
Starting from date 2/20/13 to 2/21/13, my trigger will be the Sequential difference between each element of drawn set:
Date draw Seq. dff
2/20 day 374 4, 3
Night 213 1, 2
2/21 D 866 2,0
Now my trigger is seq diff 2 (most frequent), hence my section is 24,27,79(2479). I don't have to look anywhere, but rather focus all my odds here. Remember, the trigger is based on sequential difference, hence the priority of the pairs are 24 >27>79( you may opt for 24 >47>79). I normally choose only a pair , say 24 and my range of x is 0 to highest 4, for picks 240.........244, . See the sets 47 and 79 were drawn as 147 and 791 . See the sections for the other seq dff:4>46,45,57 : 3>35,36,68 : 1>13,18, 80 and 0>02,09,91, see all these sections are bound to hit, but I have to make a choice and focus on one for a nice payout, so i go with most frequent, which is 2.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,881 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Mar 1, 2013
All am saying is your draw set should trigger a SECTION of a the POOL, this is where your focus should be, so if assumed recent draw set is 123 and my system triggers 211, then the section to consider is 211 and all my odds is on 211. The pool members are not arranged sequentially 01234.........9, when the event is bound to occur.You may call that section a Base, a SUB. You're betting your odds on these Sections instead of the big section (0-9). Now , the posed question should be ' how effective and frequent are these triggered sections?'. Randomness should be a component of the method to generate these sections. check this link https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/256775.
FL data
Fri, Mar 1, 2013
2-0-4
1-8-6-9
Thu, Feb 28, 2013
8-0-3
7-9-1
6-1-5-2
7-0-5-9
Wed, Feb 27, 2013
4-0-0
8-9-5
5-3-0-8
9-8-5-2
Tue, Feb 26, 2013
5-2-3
1-4-7
1-8-0-9
2-7-6-2
Mon, Feb 25, 2013
4-4-2
6-1-0
5-8-7-7
1-5-9-5
Sun, Feb 24, 2013
1-2-0
3-1-9
5-3-5-9
6-9-6-2
Sat, Feb 23, 2013
3-1-6
4-3-6
8-1-8-2
4-8-7-4
Fri, Feb 22, 2013
6-9-9
1-9-5
8-5-1-3
4-2-9-0
Thu, Feb 21, 2013
8-6-6
2-8-2
2-1-2-7
2-4-3-1
Wed, Feb 20, 2013
3-7-4
2-1-3
5-5-8-7
4-3-0-6
Using the above link, I can generate Sections/Base for my picks(test it).
Starting from date 2/20/13 to 2/21/13, my trigger will be the Sequential difference between each element of drawn set:
Date draw Seq. dff
2/20 day 374 4, 3
Night 213 1, 2
2/21 D 866 2,0
Now my trigger is seq diff 2 (most frequent), hence my section is 24,27,79(2479). I don't have to look anywhere, but rather focus all my odds here. Remember, the trigger is based on sequential difference, hence the priority of the pairs are 24 >27>79( you may opt for 24 >47>79). I normally choose only a pair , say 24 and my range of x is 0 to highest 4, for picks 240.........244, . See the sets 47 and 79 were drawn as 147 and 791 . See the sections for the other seq dff:4>46,45,57 : 3>35,36,68 : 1>13,18, 80 and 0>02,09,91, see all these sections are bound to hit, but I have to make a choice and focus on one for a nice payout, so i go with most frequent, which is 2.
With differences of 2,0,4,3,1,2 where does 47,79 come from ? Mirrors?
I'm sitting here listening to Merle Haggard sipping some coffee!