Does anyone really know how QP Random Number Generator really work?Prev TopicNext Topic

• redhot7

  

  California
  United States
  Member #112,359
  June 17, 2011
  661 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 1:56 am

  ▲▼

  At the very least, what parameters do they use to generate the random numbers?
• four4me

  

  MD
  United States
  Member #1,701
  June 18, 2003
  10,731 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 2:36 am

  ▲▼
  In response to redhot7

  Quote: Originally posted by redhot7 on May 22, 2013

  At the very least, what parameters do they use to generate the random numbers?

  A lot of stuff about rng's can be found on this site and the web

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_number_generation

  in computers some of them use white a noise generator

  http://www.random.org/audio-noise/

  And there are also lots of different ways to generat rng's

  Big John says. You don't hit the number. The number hits you!!!!

                 I'm not Big John, I'm Four4me, Big John's a friend.
• Stack47

  

  Kentucky
  United States
  Member #32,651
  February 14, 2006
  10,302 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 11:49 am

  ▲▼
  In response to redhot7

  Quote: Originally posted by redhot7 on May 22, 2013

  At the very least, what parameters do they use to generate the random numbers?

  That's really a good question because I never saw or heard of anyone getting a QP with 1-2-3-4-5 + 6.
• Ronnie316

  100

  United States
  Member #116,263
  September 7, 2011
  20,243 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 11:52 am

  ▲▼

  I asked that question a while back.

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/251603
• noise-gate

  

  * In hot pursuit of $ *

  White Shores- California
  United States
  Member #136,471
  December 12, 2012
  7,040 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 7:31 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Ronnie316

  Quote: Originally posted by Ronnie316 on May 22, 2013

  I asked that question a while back.

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/251603

  When you posted your question last year Ronnie,  he may have been doing something else.
• Ronnie316

  100

  United States
  Member #116,263
  September 7, 2011
  20,243 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 8:17 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to noise-gate

  Quote: Originally posted by noise-gate on May 22, 2013

  When you posted your question last year Ronnie,  he may have been doing something else.

  Thats why I posted the link...... so he could take a look and see what Todd had to say about it.......

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/251603
• noise-gate

  

  * In hot pursuit of $ *

  White Shores- California
  United States
  Member #136,471
  December 12, 2012
  7,040 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 8:39 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Ronnie316

  Quote: Originally posted by Ronnie316 on May 22, 2013

  Thats why I posted the link...... so he could take a look and see what Todd had to say about it.......

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/251603

  I guess the old motto is true: it pays to pay attention.
  
  
• Ronnie316

  100

  United States
  Member #116,263
  September 7, 2011
  20,243 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 8:44 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to noise-gate

  Quote: Originally posted by noise-gate on May 22, 2013

  I guess the old motto is true: it pays to pay attention.
  
  

  Looking back is ok too. I thought it was quite insightful to find out how QPs are made.
• savagegoose

  

  adelaide sa
  Australia
  Member #37,135
  April 11, 2006
  3,341 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 10:21 pm

  ▲▼

  there was some news of a someone in texas geting every  line of their quick pick  with th same 6 numbers , not sure how random that is

  " Still swinging, still missing "
  2014 = -1016; 2015= -1409; 2016  = -1171; 2017 = -1257 ; 2018 = - 1380 =  TOT =  - 6233

  keno historic = -2291 ; 2015= -603; 2016= -424; 2017 =-427; 2018= -223   TOT = -3968

  :
• jimmy4164

  United States
  Member #93,943
  July 10, 2010
  2,180 Posts
  Offline
  May 22, 2013, 10:37 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Ronnie316

  Quote: Originally posted by Ronnie316 on May 22, 2013

  I asked that question a while back.

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/251603

  Yeah, that generated a lot of discussion.  BTW, I wonder if SavageGoose ever figured out what was "inappropriate" about HIS post in that thread?  I checked out his link and it was not only appropriate, it was very informative.  (?)

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/251603/2734032