Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 6, 2016, 4:42 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lottery Players Are Spending $20 Per Day Playing The Lottery $73,000 In 10 Years.

Topic closed. 20 replies. Last post 3 years ago by onlymoney.

Page 2 of 2
PrintE-mailLink
MsNumberDreamer's avatar - lottery balls-cash.jpg
North Carolina
United States
Member #145690
August 11, 2013
258 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 26, 2013, 10:09 am - IP Logged

How many people on LP has ever hit megaillions or powerball.. for anything more than a free tcket.  Lol

I have gotten $150 on MM from a QP.

To God be the glory... 

When you're winning you're being blessed by Him!

 

    dallascowboyfan's avatar - tiana the-princess-and-the-frog.jpg
    Oklahoma
    United States
    Member #82391
    November 12, 2009
    6290 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: August 26, 2013, 10:49 am - IP Logged

    Cmon, you only live once. Go play.

    I Agree! you play to winBanana

    I Love Pink & Green 1908


      United States
      Member #116268
      September 7, 2011
      20244 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: August 26, 2013, 1:02 pm - IP Logged

      I Agree! you play to winBanana

      Thrifty will win the lottery jackpot someday.

        Avatar
        Kentucky
        United States
        Member #32652
        February 14, 2006
        7309 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: August 26, 2013, 2:07 pm - IP Logged

        you don't know the percentage do you No Nod

        Not difficult to figure out the 10 QPs the lottery terminal gave Thirfty had 10 had chances to win something and he won nothing. Not any of 10 QPs of the over 20 million tickets sold from any terminal in the country gave any player the jackpot winning numbers. The percentages are pretty simple when none of the thousands of lottery terminals sold any QPs with the winning combination, Thirfty would actually have a better chance if the 10 lines he picks didn't match any of the lines picked by the terminals. Even if his picks won nothing, his chances aren't any worse than the chances the terminal gave him.

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7309 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: August 26, 2013, 5:31 pm - IP Logged

          but most of the jackpot winners are computer picks...i heard on one of the lottery shows it's like 75% of the jackpot winners are computer picks

          If the jackpot was won and the winning ticket was a QP, Thrifty's 10 QP chances of winning are compared to that total. Even if 100% of all the 20 million tickets sold in the last drawing were QPs, there was only a 11.4% chance of a jackpot winning ticket. When the jackpots get to the "must win" level, I'm assuming if the self-pick players buy extra tickets, they will probably buy QPs. Some people play favorite numbers in every drawing regardless of the size of the jackpot and the percentage of those tickets to the total is probably much higher in the start-up jackpots.

          QPs probably do win more than 75% of all jackpots, but since not all drawings produce a jackpot, the overall chances of any QP winning a jackpot is still 175 million to 1. Over time when the total of all the QPs sold is added up, the average should be close to 1 out of every 175 million QPs sold won a jackpot.

          Since Thrifty decided to purchase 10 QPs in one drawing as opposed to 1 QP in 10 drawings, his chances of winning are compared to the number of QPs sold for that drawing and the chances of a QP winning that drawing are based on how many QPs are sold.

          IMO the overall percentage of QP purchases is probably much higher than 85%, but we know for a fact QPs don't produce a jackpot winning ticket in every drawing, so the chances of any self-pick line different than any of the QP lines in those drawings is compared to the number of lines not sold. If 20 million QPs were sold in the last drawing and if Thrifty selected ten lines and one of his lines was different than any of the 20 million QP lines, his odds were slightly reduced to 1 in 155 million because none of the QPs matched the winning numbers.

          My point to Thrifty was if he is going to play someday and purchase QPs, it should be for a drawing that is more likely to produce a jackpot winner. If he is going to play once every ten drawings and in that drawing, based on sales projections, that drawing is unlikely to produce a jackpot winner, playing self-picks might be the better option. While it looks good on paper to say we have a chance of winning a jackpot 104 times a year, we're ignoring the obvious; not all drawing produce a jackpot winner so in reality we don't have 104 chances a year.

          The logic of playing QPs "someday" makes sense because since PB went to $2 a ticket, there were only 10 drawings with about a 50% chance of having a winner based on the sales. Your guess is as good as mine whether is makes more sense having 104 chances a year compared to having 104 chances in one drawing that is more likely to produce a jackpot because either way, the expense is still $208 a year.


            United States
            Member #128790
            June 2, 2012
            5431 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: August 26, 2013, 8:21 pm - IP Logged

            but most of the jackpot winners are computer picks...i heard on one of the lottery shows it's like 75% of the jackpot winners are computer picks

            The reason is because most people play QPs. QPs don't have any more of a chance than self picks unless the person has a really good system that was tested to work relatively well on a regular basis.