Newport News, VA United States
Member #144,539
July 8, 2013
989 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by onlymoney on Oct 18, 2013
Poor SergeM, his ego is so butthurt that he has to go out on a limb to create ficticious accounts like KennyGee, stephenazclown, and BethVermin, to "1 star" my threads and "5 star" his threads.
How pathetic does one's life have to be to waste that much energy into such a trivial pursuit?
If I ever lost sleep over star ratings on LP, I'd commit myself to a mental institution as soon as possible.
United States
Member #134,621
November 2, 2012
1,175 Posts
Offline
This is insane. You are showing 6 and 6 combinations, if Imake pairs of them, it's 24 pairs ( could be even 36) then those pairs have to be multiplied by 2 to make Front pairs and Back pairs, then they have to be flipped, so altogether 48X2= 96 pairs. If Iplay 96 pairs, I can only win $50, it's not worth it.
United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Uluska on Oct 24, 2013
This is insane. You are showing 6 and 6 combinations, if Imake pairs of them, it's 24 pairs ( could be even 36) then those pairs have to be multiplied by 2 to make Front pairs and Back pairs, then they have to be flipped, so altogether 48X2= 96 pairs. If Iplay 96 pairs, I can only win $50, it's not worth it.
My bad, I should've mentioned in my first post that the pairs I get aren't from the 12 combos, but the original two combos (in red) that make the 12 combos. You don't make pairs out of the 12 combos. That would be insane. lol
But I do have to stress that this system focuses on the 12 combos it creates, not the pairs. The pairs were only an after thought as a last resort if the system didn't do well in your state.
Example, California,
October 21 mid-723
October 22 mid-038
723=HLM=312
723 723
312+ 312 -
035411
October 21 eve-597
October 22 eve-463
597=LHM=132
597 597
132+ 132 -
629 465
October 23 eve-078
October 24 mid-011 eve-311
078=LMH=123
078 078
123+ 123 -
191155
(Notice the one-off I mentioned earlier. 011 and 191. The 0 and 9 are 1-off).
So If I played 191 with a 1-off I'd have 091-191-291
United States
Member #134,621
November 2, 2012
1,175 Posts
Offline
OK, so out of each combination you make 3 pairs, 6 pairs out of two combinations altogether. If game is not winning then you loose 6 tickets, and as I see in last example pair ended up being Back pair, so you have to make both Front pairs and Back pairs, so altogether it ends up being 12 pairs per game. If several games do not win, say 4 games, then you loose $48, and if 5th game wins, then you spent alltogether $60 tickets to win $50. Playing pairs is not worth it. Need to develop system to win $500.
United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Uluska on Oct 25, 2013
OK, so out of each combination you make 3 pairs, 6 pairs out of two combinations altogether. If game is not winning then you loose 6 tickets, and as I see in last example pair ended up being Back pair, so you have to make both Front pairs and Back pairs, so altogether it ends up being 12 pairs per game. If several games do not win, say 4 games, then you loose $48, and if 5th game wins, then you spent alltogether $60 tickets to win $50. Playing pairs is not worth it. Need to develop system to win $500.