Welcome Guest
You last visited January 24, 2017, 4:45 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Fernando's "LMH=123 Numbers"

Topic closed. 17 replies. Last post 3 years ago by MonEl.

 Page 1 of 2

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 31, 2013, 12:31 am - IP Logged

0, 1 and 2    = 1
3, 4, 5 and 6 = 2
7, 8 and 9    = 3

I think that I made this before as a pick 3 filter, but now I am making it as a set of numbers, a kind of substitute pick 3 numbers.

Fernando's "LMH=123 Numbers"

New Jersey (NJ) Pick 3 Midday

Wed, Oct 30, 2013    3-0-7 213
Tue, Oct 29, 2013    9-2-0 311
Mon, Oct 28, 2013    1-4-0 121
Sun, Oct 27, 2013    3-8-3 232
Sat, Oct 26, 2013    6-2-9 213
Fri, Oct 25, 2013    8-2-8 313
Thu, Oct 24, 2013    5-6-1 221
Wed, Oct 23, 2013    6-0-8 213
Tue, Oct 22, 2013    5-9-3 232
Mon, Oct 21, 2013    4-6-3 222
Sun, Oct 20, 2013    0-2-5 112
Sat, Oct 19, 2013    3-4-2 221
Fri, Oct 18, 2013    0-0-2 111
Thu, Oct 17, 2013    5-8-3 232
Wed, Oct 16, 2013    9-1-7 313
Tue, Oct 15, 2013    7-8-6 332
Mon, Oct 14, 2013    0-8-9 133
Sun, Oct 13, 2013    9-7-4 332
Sat, Oct 12, 2013    3-0-5 212
Fri, Oct 11, 2013    2-2-9 113

I don't know if there are any mistakes in the conversions, but maybe not.

I think that these 27 numbers equal the 1000 straight pick 3 numbers.

27 Numbers:
123, 132, 213, 231, 312, 321, 112, 113, 121, 122, 131, 133, 211, 212, 221, 223, 232, 233, 311, 313, 322, 323, 331, 332, 111, 222, 333

I don't know right now of how much use this set of numbers or number system might be.

I post it more as a curiosity than any-thing else.

But who knows? It might even be better than the VTracs or not.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

United States
Member #141260
April 9, 2013
1390 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 31, 2013, 9:58 pm - IP Logged

0, 1 and 2    = 1
3, 4, 5 and 6 = 2
7, 8 and 9    = 3

I think that I made this before as a pick 3 filter, but now I am making it as a set of numbers, a kind of substitute pick 3 numbers.

Fernando's "LMH=123 Numbers"

New Jersey (NJ) Pick 3 Midday

Wed, Oct 30, 2013    3-0-7 213
Tue, Oct 29, 2013    9-2-0 311
Mon, Oct 28, 2013    1-4-0 121
Sun, Oct 27, 2013    3-8-3 232
Sat, Oct 26, 2013    6-2-9 213
Fri, Oct 25, 2013    8-2-8 313
Thu, Oct 24, 2013    5-6-1 221
Wed, Oct 23, 2013    6-0-8 213
Tue, Oct 22, 2013    5-9-3 232
Mon, Oct 21, 2013    4-6-3 222
Sun, Oct 20, 2013    0-2-5 112
Sat, Oct 19, 2013    3-4-2 221
Fri, Oct 18, 2013    0-0-2 111
Thu, Oct 17, 2013    5-8-3 232
Wed, Oct 16, 2013    9-1-7 313
Tue, Oct 15, 2013    7-8-6 332
Mon, Oct 14, 2013    0-8-9 133
Sun, Oct 13, 2013    9-7-4 332
Sat, Oct 12, 2013    3-0-5 212
Fri, Oct 11, 2013    2-2-9 113

I don't know if there are any mistakes in the conversions, but maybe not.

I think that these 27 numbers equal the 1000 straight pick 3 numbers.

27 Numbers:
123, 132, 213, 231, 312, 321, 112, 113, 121, 122, 131, 133, 211, 212, 221, 223, 232, 233, 311, 313, 322, 323, 331, 332, 111, 222, 333

I don't know right now of how much use this set of numbers or number system might be.

I post it more as a curiosity than any-thing else.

But who knows? It might even be better than the VTracs or not.

Thanks for post..... I wonder how paymenOw is doing

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 31, 2013, 11:57 pm - IP Logged

Thanks for post..... I wonder how paymenOw is doing

paymenow:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The LMH=123 numbers each can have from 27 to 64 straight pick 3 numbers.

I can make by hand LMH=123 numbers out of pick 3 numbers, but turning LMH=123 numbers back into pick 3 numbers can be done with a straight pick 3 wheeler, it all would take some time to be done, but as there only are 27 LMH=123 numbers is not as bad as it would otherwise be.

It might be easier tracking 27 than tracking 125 VTracs, but a VTrac is only worth 8 pick 3 numbers so that is a good thing about the VTracs.

----------------------

Maybe a combination of tracking and filtering might work with these 27 numbers.

But it is really too much trouble to do those conversions without proper software.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 1, 2013, 12:10 am - IP Logged

27 Numbers:
123, 132, 213, 231, 312, 321, 112, 113, 121, 122, 131, 133, 211, 212, 221, 223, 232, 233, 311, 313, 322, 323, 331, 332, 111, 222, 333

---------------------------------

6 Singles:

123, 132, 213, 231, 312, 321

---------------------------

18 Doubles: 112, 113, 121, 122, 131, 133, 211, 212, 221, 223, 232, 233, 311, 313, 322, 323, 331, 332

----------------

3 Triples: 111, 222, 333.

----------------

The six Singles are kind of a one 123.

----------------

The 18 Doubles are kind of 3 way numbers so almost kind of like 6 numbers.

-----------------------

And the Triples are just Triples, 3 of them.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

Economy class
Belgium
Member #123700
February 27, 2012
4035 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 1, 2013, 5:29 am - IP Logged

I would leave 0 out of it and make 1: 1 2 3, 2: 4 5 6, 3: 7 8 9. How do you like it?

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 1, 2013, 6:47 am - IP Logged

I would leave 0 out of it and make 1: 1 2 3, 2: 4 5 6, 3: 7 8 9. How do you like it?

The problem with that is that not having a 0 makes 729 straight pick 3 numbers and that leaves out  almost 300 straight numbers out of the 1000, the good thing about it is that it would make the L, M and the H have all 3 digits each so each of the LMH numbers would have the same number of pick 3 numbers in them.

But it would make for a not complete set of numbers, you would introduce a 27.1% inherent failure rate on top of the failures that your prediction system would also give you.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

saint louis, mo.
United States
Member #143091
May 24, 2013
813 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 1, 2013, 7:18 am - IP Logged

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 1, 2013, 10:43 pm - IP Logged

kimber45

I am sorry, but I can't explain it better than I already did.

Those numbers are not any good to most people.

Very very few people can use what I posted here on this thread.

Understanding is not so much the hard part, but being able to use the stuff is hard, special software might be needed in order to use what I posted here, even I could not easily use those numbers, too much trouble without special software even for me.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

Economy class
Belgium
Member #123700
February 27, 2012
4035 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 4:52 am - IP Logged

The problem with that is that not having a 0 makes 729 straight pick 3 numbers and that leaves out  almost 300 straight numbers out of the 1000, the good thing about it is that it would make the L, M and the H have all 3 digits each so each of the LMH numbers would have the same number of pick 3 numbers in them.

But it would make for a not complete set of numbers, you would introduce a 27.1% inherent failure rate on top of the failures that your prediction system would also give you.

27.1% failure means nothing in randomness as you would not play on those occasions where 0 occurs. The expectancy of 50% loss of money stays.

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2138 Posts
Online
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 3:41 pm - IP Logged

Hello, monel that your system is good for couples, in example 20 drawings that showed only 3 of them have made the three digits in each group (1,2,3) in the 17 draws remaining gave the pair or group 1 or 2 or 3, ie in group 1 = 0,1,2 have 3 pairs possivies in groups both have 6 possible pairs and group 3 have three possible pairs, then in 20 draws, only three have 1,2,3 sweepstakes (or is one digit from each group) that your system is good to choose pairs = example if one forecast is 233, then I'll have a pair of Group 3 (or three couples) 7,8,9 = 78.79, 89, the other dgitoou third digit is in the case of the two group = 3,4,5,6

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 7:35 pm - IP Logged

Hello, monel that your system is good for couples, in example 20 drawings that showed only 3 of them have made the three digits in each group (1,2,3) in the 17 draws remaining gave the pair or group 1 or 2 or 3, ie in group 1 = 0,1,2 have 3 pairs possivies in groups both have 6 possible pairs and group 3 have three possible pairs, then in 20 draws, only three have 1,2,3 sweepstakes (or is one digit from each group) that your system is good to choose pairs = example if one forecast is 233, then I'll have a pair of Group 3 (or three couples) 7,8,9 = 78.79, 89, the other dgitoou third digit is in the case of the two group = 3,4,5,6

Before I posted about it, it might had been the best thing since sliced bread, but as the people from the state lotteries can also read, who knows how it might do now, from what I saw earlier today on the newer past draws, it might not do as good as before.

The more upset that I get with the state lotteries, the more stuff that I come out with.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2138 Posts
Online
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 7:55 pm - IP Logged

Ok monel, it seems that dividing into groups or sectors (3 sectors 1,2,3) gets to predict patterns, analyzing the 0-9, so with 3 sectors is much better prediction mainly couples. We need to see your system in positional each digit with that you can better see the third digit, ok

United States
Member #132100
August 26, 2012
1108 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 8:09 pm - IP Logged

kimber45

I am sorry, but I can't explain it better than I already did.

Those numbers are not any good to most people.

Very very few people can use what I posted here on this thread.

Understanding is not so much the hard part, but being able to use the stuff is hard, special software might be needed in order to use what I posted here, even I could not easily use those numbers, too much trouble without special software even for me.

What I said on that post is not quite true, but I felt like I had to say something.

It is easy to understand and there is already a software that more or less can be used for this, there could be better software than it, but right now there is not, I think but I am not sure cause maybe there is another software that might have a form of the stuff and if it does it might be better.

But don't anybody ask about software, cause I didn't say anything and don't know anything either.

I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.

United States
Member #141260
April 9, 2013
1390 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 8:17 pm - IP Logged

Was just reading an old post of yours.
Lottery gamrs cracking group...

Did it ever start.   Anyway I discovered a new filter trick.  I'm excited about it.  Less failures

United States
Member #141260
April 9, 2013
1390 Posts
Offline
 Posted: November 2, 2013, 8:19 pm - IP Logged

Go ahead get upset. Post more goodies....

 Page 1 of 2