Welcome Guest
You last visited April 30, 2017, 6:43 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# what basic filters to avoid conflicts in a lottery?

Topic closed. 31 replies. Last post 2 years ago by dr san.

 Page 2 of 3
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20022 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 19, 2015, 12:46 pm - IP Logged

Sorry RJOh I didn't explain it well enough.   In 6/49 each previous draw consists of 6 unique numbers.  If we ignore those 6 numbers from the previous draw, (we're talking just those six not all past winning draws) not including them in our next draw's play, on the days this strategy proves correct 45% of the time we do indeed get the reduction.

Most filtering software includes this filter asking how many numbers from the previous draw among the lines, (most would pick one because the odds are 1 in 8 one number from the previous draw will appear in the next) instead select 0, be correct 45% of the time and drop the game size from 6/49 to 6/43 on those days.

BobP

Being correct 45% of the times means you're incorrect 55% of the time, wouldn't you want to make choices that are correct more than 50% of the time?

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3134 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 19, 2015, 9:35 pm - IP Logged

Being correct 45% of the times means you're incorrect 55% of the time, wouldn't you want to make choices that are correct more than 50% of the time?

Funny you should ask that, seeing as how you already answered.

To be correct 45% of the time, do nothing more than eliminate the previous draw's six winning numbers from the field.

To be correct 50%+ of the time you have to be correct making several choices all of which can result in no way to win a jackpot when wrong.  See it isn't just about one (44%) or two numbers (12%) from the previous draw repeating, you have to pick which one(s) it will be.  Along with the risk three, four or five might repeat.

BobP

"You're right of the 1355 OCL drawings 601 had no numbers from the previous drawing, that's 44.4%.  557 had one, 170 had two and 3 had 26.  The percentages are even better for games with larger matrix, for PB it's 59%."

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2196 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 11:18 am - IP Logged

BOBP  the last remaining digits of the last draw for next? How could they help to predict the next numbers?

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20022 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 1:52 pm - IP Logged

Since running off a group of combinations using filters isn't that hard why not run off several groups of combinations using filters in different ways and see which ones has the most winners.

That's what I did last night with the 10 PB lines I posted on the prediction board and played.  I ran off four groups of 10 combinations first using filters the way I normally used them and then using them in some new ways making find 10 combinations to play a lot faster.  I picked the last group to play and check all four groups after the drawing.

Unfortunately the group I played had no winners but the first group matched 3+0.  Fortunately it would had only paid \$7 'cause I would have felt sick if I found out it would have matched 5+0 for \$1M.

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

Texas
United States
Member #55889
October 23, 2007
6115 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 1:59 pm - IP Logged

Since running off a group of combinations using filters isn't that hard why not run off several groups of combinations using filters in different ways and see which ones has the most winners.

That's what I did last night with the 10 PB lines I posted on the prediction board and played.  I ran off four groups of 10 combinations first using filters the way I normally used them and then using them in some new ways making find 10 combinations to play a lot faster.  I picked the last group to play and check all four groups after the drawing.

Unfortunately the group I played had no winners but the first group matched 3+0.  Fortunately it would had only paid \$7 'cause I would have felt sick if I found out it would have matched 5+0 for \$1M.

Did you buy any tics for real?

Heck, that jackpot is worth tossing \$2 at.

CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR \$2)

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2196 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 3:21 pm - IP Logged

hello rjol e bobp, the first larger filters (with a higher limit of minor and major) and last more tuned filters, the problem which broad filters accompanies the standards? and tighter filters?

New Member

Ð’ÐµÐ»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð±Ñ€Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ
Member #168564
September 6, 2015
1 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 3:53 pm - IP Logged

sorry who can help me? I cant understand ,haw to shoose number,filter

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20022 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 4:01 pm - IP Logged

hello rjol e bobp, the first larger filters (with a higher limit of minor and major) and last more tuned filters, the problem which broad filters accompanies the standards? and tighter filters?

When I'm filtering for combinations to play I probably have only looked at no more than 50,000 random combinations before I have 10-20 combinations to play.  I'm not looking at every possible combinations.  Except for the data file that I compare ever pick with to make sure it hasn't come up before my filters are two or three lines of code that limit which combination passes.

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20022 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 4:05 pm - IP Logged

Did you buy any tics for real?

Heck, that jackpot is worth tossing \$2 at.

If played them I brought them.

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2196 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 20, 2015, 6:06 pm - IP Logged

hello bobp and  rjol Certainly the next draw begins by analyzing the last draw, since the double intervals and crack proof this Despite all have the same chance to get out, we can make any prediction of at least one following group. The question of the last digits can and should be used.
Other filter is for reference frequency but by position by position, draw in ascending order is more profitable than in order of draw as it has more numbers that repeat in certain positions example the number 23 over the 2nd and 3rd place on 49/6 in the expense of other positions, despite all positions have the same opportunity

Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3134 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 21, 2015, 9:09 am - IP Logged

BOBP  the last remaining digits of the last draw for next? How could they help to predict the next numbers?

Not talking about digits.   Concurrence is not causality.

BobP

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4287 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 21, 2015, 9:22 am - IP Logged

BobP

"Concurrence is not causality."

Well said!!!!

RL

....

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2196 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 22, 2015, 6:56 am - IP Logged
hello ,  " Moving Average " indicator , allowing you to find a standard for the filter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average

This indicator is used in WS traders (Dow Jones , NYSE , NASDAQ ... ) .

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/movingaverage.asp
bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92564
June 9, 2010
2196 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 22, 2015, 9:33 am - IP Logged
hello ,  " Moving Average " indicator , allowing you to find a standard for the filter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average

This indicator is used in WS traders (Dow Jones , NYSE , NASDAQ ... ) .

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/movingaverage.asp

http://ezinearticles.com/?How-To-Use-VBA-To-Create-A-Moving-Average-Of-Prime-Numbers-In-Lotto-Results&id=8442874

Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3134 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 22, 2015, 7:51 pm - IP Logged

hello bobp and  rjol Certainly the next draw begins by analyzing the last draw, since the double intervals and crack proof this Despite all have the same chance to get out, we can make any prediction of at least one following group. The question of the last digits can and should be used.
Other filter is for reference frequency but by position by position, draw in ascending order is more profitable than in order of draw as it has more numbers that repeat in certain positions example the number 23 over the 2nd and 3rd place on 49/6 in the expense of other positions, despite all positions have the same opportunity

Even though Lotwin is no longer for sale due to the restrictive VAT tax in Europe you can still get the free demo at http://www.lotwin.com/ for a look at the filters and analysis of the filters needed to win past draws.  Support for your Brazil 6/50 and 6/60 games.  Please consider signing the anti-vat tax petition on the site.

Some past draws need many filters while others not so much.  The strategy is to work out a plan that when things go your way trap the jackpot.

It is always best to start with all the numbers, all the combinations, so the winner is in there, yours to filter away.

First filter is you don't have to play every draw.  If your strategy is not to play numbers from the previous draw and the last two draws did not have any numbers from the previous draw, you might want to skip the next draw.

Pick the strongest filter(s) you have confidence in your ability to get correct and work your way down.

Most filters have no valid basis for prediction, they are simply a percentage of the population and can be expected to hit over time at roughly that percentage.

Look and learn by analyzing past draws that won with fewest filters, they usually include a longshot or two that really cut down the combinations.

The draw analysis can almost always show you the filters that come down to a handful of combinations or even a single play, but backing off that by clicking on a filter and removing its pick you may find playing say 8 lines would have included the jackpot without using that filter(s).

BobP

 Page 2 of 3