Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 8, 2016, 10:57 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

since IL. is going to use RNG for pick 3 and 4 anyone have any advice?

Topic closed. 36 replies. Last post 1 year ago by mypiemaster.

Page 3 of 3
4.73
PrintE-mailLink
BobP's avatar - bobp avatar.png
Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3104 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 10, 2015, 9:41 am - IP Logged

My opinion, don't play random against random. 

Pick some numbers, for this kind of thing I prefer numaric order 1-2-3, 4-5-6, 7-8-9 and let the lottery come to you. 

Use a money management system, raising the amount played on each number so the prize covers expenses plus what you need to win.

If truely random expect a box number from the previous 14 draws to repeat in the next 14 draws 50% of the time.

Or buy a cheeze burger.

BobP

    sully16's avatar - sharan
    Ringleader
    Michigan
    United States
    Member #81740
    October 28, 2009
    40512 Posts
    Online
    Posted: October 10, 2015, 11:22 am - IP Logged

    All the advice in the world won't help if the RNG dislikes giving out numbers that players are playing!

    Exactly, it's a crap shoot.

    Did you exchange a walk on part in the war ?

    For a lead role in a cage?

     

                                                From Pink Floyd's " Wish you were here"

      Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
      Zeta Reticuli Star System
      United States
      Member #30470
      January 17, 2006
      10351 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 10, 2015, 11:25 am - IP Logged

      BobP,

      "Pick some numbers, for this kind of thing I prefer numaric order 1-2-3, 4-5-6, 7-8-9 and let the lottery come to you."

      You sold me. Also, I wonder about this- a lot of people who play video poker say they've won by intentionally discarding a good hand, it 'throws the machine off."

      I don't know if this is worth  anything against RNGs or not, but on play slops that have a Void option, I fill out a game, then void it, then fill in the next one. Just trying to psyche out the machine.

      Scared

      Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.

      Lep

      There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.

        Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
        Zeta Reticuli Star System
        United States
        Member #30470
        January 17, 2006
        10351 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: October 10, 2015, 11:25 pm - IP Logged

        BobP,

        Good call on numeric order.

        IL Pick 3 EVE:

        Sat, Oct 10, 2015 8-7-9, Fireball: 6?s
        Fri, Oct 9, 2015    0-8-9,   Fireball: 6?

        Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.

        Lep

        There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.

          butch2030's avatar - DiscoBallGlowing
          The KEY ingredient is Combos & Patterns
          Elgin, IL
          United States
          Member #68867
          January 1, 2009
          1221 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: October 12, 2015, 10:45 am - IP Logged

          Yesterday IL Pick 4 Midday drawing 10/11/15 - 8 4 0 6 What I am finding is that RNG is picking numbers boxed that have hit in the past (01/01/2011 - current). But, it appears not to be drawing Straight sets that hit in the past.  Under the old system, I would find, on an avg., 15 straight sets of numbers that came in on past drawings out of every 50 current drawings.  Or simply put, approx 3 past (from 01/01/2011) straight drawings for every 15 current drawings.  I have yet to see under the RNG any Straight sets of numbers from the past.  But then again, it is still early in the game.

          Getting back to 8 4 0 6. 

          2013-02-19E0468
          2014-12-17M0648
          2012-01-31M0864
          2012-11-16M0864
          2015-06-06E0864
          2013-10-13M4086
          2015-07-29M4086
          2014-11-03M4608
          2011-02-24E4680
          2015-04-26E4806
          2011-09-08M4860
          2015-01-04M6048
          2013-03-23E6480
          2014-06-05M6480
          2015-10-11M8406
          2011-05-08M8604
            Avatar
            Lincoln, California
            United States
            Member #167130
            June 27, 2015
            256 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: October 12, 2015, 3:11 pm - IP Logged

            Personally, I prefer that the Game I analyze is based on RNG.  That way it is my computer vs. their computer.  It is a war game that I am addicted to like people are hooked on any other computer game.  The ultimate goal is to pick the numbers so often that the State goes back to the physical process that can be observed. The war has to be won on 2 Fronts. The first is cracking the code.  While we are all trying our best to crack that code, in a dark room somewhere it is watching us and adjusting output to thwart our best efforts. I know it sound impossible but WE can win.  To do so WE need a Nobile Goal.  I propose that that Goal is the Banishment of the RNG.  The fact that the side benefit will be winning lots of money is worthy of further discussion and WE will all have guard against losing site of the Nobile Goal.  OUR attempts to Crack the Code should be accompanied by Diplomatic Efforts to ride ourselves of the RNG Over-Lord.

            That is not my Forte.  I leave that part to ANY of you that can help.  I prefer my own dark room with my own Computer searching for the Magic Box (Reference Box) that can crack the code.  I don’t play so I have to keep my eye on the Nobile Goal while getting lost in what ifs and self satisfaction from successful process creation.  Since this all just occurred to me, I’m not sure how I will do and I can’t rule out playing so I will have to deal with all that anyway.

            I know, It sounds Nuts; “BUT”?  There is always a “BUT”.  So my current “BUT” will probably sound even more Nut’s; BUT, what if we had an analysis of every Possible Reference Box for like say 2x2, 3x3, 3x4, 4x4.  Definitely Nut’s since for example a 3x3 box has 10 to the ninth combinations; BUT, What if we had the Data?  If we could see when any Box was a winner over any period of time of the lottery’s past could a Pattern of Alternating Boxes be the Key?  Would other methods of analysis find the Key. Nice dream but first comes the Data.  In my dark room I have figured out a process to Create Reference Boxes derived by several sorting and selection methods discussed in a separate thread on the Lottery System Forum.  Since I just made Rooky it is time to learn how to include threads, next time.  What came out of the process is a way to fill any Box and run it back through the Lottery Data to check for weeks it produced a winner.  I am using a Spread Sheet, the main component of my addiction, in this case Excel to do the process.  Macros in the file produce the data extremely fast until the file grows large and slows down the process.  Still with 10 to the 6 combinations of the 3x3 box alone may take a life time to generate them all.  The Plan is to focus on enough successful Boxes to a Pattern.  Spread Sheets may prove to limited or cumbersome to complete the process. Since both sides of the coin are important you can’t know all there is to know until you look at all of every Boxes success and failures.  Failures are as important as Success and tell us what not to do. Since I don’t have the Super Computer required to generate and process all of this data I will be Stopping at Intervals hoping to see if a Patterns that Crack the Code.  ANY of you can join me in the fight.  I am a zealous Rooky with lot’s of determination. ANYONE willing with their own Platform can join the fight.  WE just need to spread the load and not duplicate efforts.  WHO’S WITH ME?

            Nature has already shown her Randomness.  Patterns are required for us to view the physical and what we chase in the case of the lottery, all to try to glimpse the future.  You can view the closed environment of a Ball Machine” and watch the selection process, try to imagine what makes one ball get sucked up the tube and not another.  Instead of just Computers lets get Physics back in the Game. LET’S DO IT FOR PHYSICS 

            LET’S TAKE THE LOTTERY BACK FROM THE r n g

              mypiemaster's avatar - 2015021003pileofcash
              JACKPOT HUNTER

              United States
              Member #141034
              April 2, 2013
              1408 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: October 12, 2015, 3:32 pm - IP Logged

              Get ready to be hosed. If you win BIG, you are not going to be paid asap.

              Seek and ye shall find -Matt. 7:7 ...Ask and ye shall receive -John 16:24 ...Give and it shall be given unto you -Luke 6:38 ...Be careful what you ask for!!! -Mypiemaster 1:1

              Having Money Solves Problems That Not Having Money Creates Yes Nod ****John Carlton****