Non-transparent lottery. What are they hiding?Prev TopicNext Topic

• LiveInGreenBay

  

  Green Bay
  United States
  Member #169,383
  October 15, 2015
  2,901 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 1, 2016, 4:32 pm

  ▲▼

  I sent the Wisconsin lottery a question via email...Asked them where I can get a pre-test number list to the RNG computer drawings.  Got a reply today...They said they they do not have a list and don't intend on publishing a list. 

  My reply to them... "Are you telling me there is no record of all pre-test numbers prior to the daily computer generated drawing?  Really?  Thats not very transparent.  We're talking a computer program here not mechanical balls right"? 

  Can't wait for the reply.

  Never give up. 
• RJOh

  

  100

  mid-Ohio
  United States
  Member #9
  March 24, 2001
  20,272 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 1, 2016, 7:06 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to LiveInGreenBay

  Quote: Originally posted by LiveInGreenBay on Jun 1, 2016

  I sent the Wisconsin lottery a question via email...Asked them where I can get a pre-test number list to the RNG computer drawings.  Got a reply today...They said they they do not have a list and don't intend on publishing a list. 

  My reply to them... "Are you telling me there is no record of all pre-test numbers prior to the daily computer generated drawing?  Really?  Thats not very transparent.  We're talking a computer program here not mechanical balls right"? 

  Can't wait for the reply.

  They might answer if you don't like the way they run their lottery, don't play.

   * you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones * 

         
  
• Coin Toss

  

  Zeta Reticuli Star System
  United States
  Member #30,469
  January 17, 2006
  11,788 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 1, 2016, 8:18 pm

  ▲▼

  LiveInGreenBay,

  What RJOh said and if you get a reply it will probably say something like "It's on a need to know basis". Lotteries don't like players trying to get into internal lottery affairs, unless they're invited, like to watch drawings. That's about as far as it goes.

  Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any. So many systems, so many theories, so few jackpot winners. 

  

  There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.
• Stack47

  

  Kentucky
  United States
  Member #32,651
  February 14, 2006
  10,302 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 1, 2016, 9:01 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to LiveInGreenBay

  Quote: Originally posted by LiveInGreenBay on Jun 1, 2016

  I sent the Wisconsin lottery a question via email...Asked them where I can get a pre-test number list to the RNG computer drawings.  Got a reply today...They said they they do not have a list and don't intend on publishing a list. 

  My reply to them... "Are you telling me there is no record of all pre-test numbers prior to the daily computer generated drawing?  Really?  Thats not very transparent.  We're talking a computer program here not mechanical balls right"? 

  Can't wait for the reply.

  Testing an RNG is about the same as over and over again clicking on any website to see if their link works. Next time simply ask if they conduct any daily pre-drawing test because if they don't, there are no results to record.
• MonEl

  

  United States
  Member #132,094
  August 26, 2012
  1,243 Posts
  Offline
  Jun 2, 2016, 1:04 am

  ▲▼
  In response to LiveInGreenBay

  Quote: Originally posted by LiveInGreenBay on Jun 1, 2016

  I sent the Wisconsin lottery a question via email...Asked them where I can get a pre-test number list to the RNG computer drawings.  Got a reply today...They said they they do not have a list and don't intend on publishing a list. 

  My reply to them... "Are you telling me there is no record of all pre-test numbers prior to the daily computer generated drawing?  Really?  Thats not very transparent.  We're talking a computer program here not mechanical balls right"? 

  Can't wait for the reply.

  I don't know for sure, but it probably doesn't matter much.

  After all, Math people do say that any-one drawing doesn't have anything at all to do with any other drawing.

  And in the way that they mean it, that is in the way that they mean that, they might be right.

  Statistics might be the only thing that connects and or relates any-one drawing and or drawings with any other drawing and or drawings.

  I tried to prove that once many years ago, I read here at the Lottery Post that North Carolina had many Pre and Post Tests on their pick 3 games and people were complaining about it and saying that, that is why they could not predict the winning pick 3 numbers, because their predicted pick 3 numbers would instead show-up on either the Pre or on the Post Test pick 3 numbers and here is what I did:

  First prediction:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362634

  Results:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362639

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362642

  As you can see there, I have never been perfect.

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362643

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362647

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362649

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362686

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362699

  People are never happy, they want you to make them rich.

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362709

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362727

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362741

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362754

  What a circus show!

  -------------------------

  -------------------------

  Second prediction, I tried to make them happy:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364008

  Results:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364026

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364054

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364074

  --------------------------------------

  Third prediction:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364207

  Results:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364675

  I failed that time.

  ---------------------------------

  Fourth prediction:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2365443

  Results:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2365486

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2365522

  ------------------------------

  Fifth and last prediction:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2366895

  ---------------

  Results:

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2367016

  I again failed.

  -----------------------------

  I made 5 Box predictions for NC that time.

  I more or less won 2 or 3 times and I failed 2 or 3 times.

  If I had been on NC instead of on Tx and if I had used progressive betting, then I would have made some money, I think, I would have played only Singles and then won only 2 times out of 5 times, also it is not a good idea to play the predicted numbers that were reduced too much.

  But I never played, I used to predict just for the fun of it and as a past-time, something to do.

  ---------------

  Now, I don't know if I did prove something or not, I probably did prove that I had too much time on my hands.

  Christian Radio    Bible     ParishesOnline   Daily Mass1   Daily Mass2   Notre Dame Mass   Simon Jude 
  

  Mass   Last Week's Mass   Church Services              I AM GONE, FOR A WHILE.
  

  "Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."            Hava Nagila