United States
Member #164,717
March 12, 2015
3,507 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by mtmk on Sep 26, 2016
Anyone have any experience with this? Seems like another scam.
Below is a quote from the Lotteryguy's system reviews about this system. He actually buys systems and rates them.
"Lottery Destroyer / ‘Mike Bennett’– more hype and nonsense from this online software that simply combines hot/cold number theory with your favourite/lucky numbers. Neither of which makes any difference to your chances of winning. Don’t even waste your $5 on the 5 day trial – spend it on quick picks instead and you’ll have a much better chance of winning."
Broken Arrow Oklahoma United States
Member #85,716
January 21, 2010
172 Posts
Offline
I saw on one website this went for $147, which is way too much. Plus the idea is that you can quit and earn a living playing full time. Way too extreme. There are some software out there that is not bad for around $25 to $40. This is just a hobby and the cost of the software is like buying a computer game. it's all in fun.
Belgium
Member #173,922
March 26, 2016
1,396 Posts
Offline
I remember a website selling software for over 200 dollars. Programming my own, I understand that you don't get help and that a lot of work is put in it. People tend to go for anything that is for free. They forget about the costs of maintaining data, codes and servers, next to the time spent. I suppose that my program would be worth over 200 dollars and that would not be way too much. I don't have trustworthy paying test bunnies. I know about some code solutions and have an idea what could have been programmed worth thousands of dollars. Those programs probably are kept on disconnected computers.
It is a hobby. A lot of money is paid by gamers for software and computers. I think that lottery software isn't much appreciated.
United States
Member #173,008
February 13, 2016
1,637 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Sunglasses on Oct 2, 2016
I remember a website selling software for over 200 dollars. Programming my own, I understand that you don't get help and that a lot of work is put in it. People tend to go for anything that is for free. They forget about the costs of maintaining data, codes and servers, next to the time spent. I suppose that my program would be worth over 200 dollars and that would not be way too much. I don't have trustworthy paying test bunnies. I know about some code solutions and have an idea what could have been programmed worth thousands of dollars. Those programs probably are kept on disconnected computers.
It is a hobby. A lot of money is paid by gamers for software and computers. I think that lottery software isn't much appreciated.
People who play daily and mostly whoever plays more than 50$ a day might buy and try these online systems. Also same is true for those monthly memberships with methods, charts and wheels.Many people are playing more than one state and bet online.
For them, It's like just saving 4 days bet amount and buying the software.
For Jackpot games, the trick lies in playing like a set of 10 numbers for every draw and wait till it Hits or join a pool and generate numbers every draw. Even if there are AI, neral network code and so on, the number of tickets and the huge odds play in favor of the Lottery companies(MUSL)
Even for Pick 3 and Pick 4, the house has the edge.
Softwares are really useful for non-programmers and programmers who don't have time to write a complete suite.
Philadelphia, PA United States
Member #153,765
March 24, 2014
12,492 Posts
Offline
I will be honest with you I have found that this website is more effective if you know how to play the lottery system games better than buying software. Once the lottery pyramid is figured out and of course there's no guarantees I have seen the winning results and that's what I'm going to use I just don't like these lottery so cold systems
United States
Member #173,008
February 13, 2016
1,637 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by wander73 on Oct 3, 2016
I will be honest with you I have found that this website is more effective if you know how to play the lottery system games better than buying software. Once the lottery pyramid is figured out and of course there's no guarantees I have seen the winning results and that's what I'm going to use I just don't like these lottery so cold systems
Yes. Methods and techniques explained here in LP are good to generate numbers that are better than lottery quick picks especially for jackpot and you will have a satisfaction that you chose the numbers. You can also use all premium features and get profited if you are a serious player or predictor.
For pick 3 and pick 4 since the odds are considerably lesser 1:1000 and 1:10000, there is a chance that some methods and techniques might yield the winning number. Or someone might have clubed methods and filtering strategy to make profit out of these. Definitely not many people are winning pick 3 and pick 4 and making a living out of the wins.
More numbers a method produces, more the loss that gets acculated in each miss. Lesser the numbers produced and played, lesser the odds of winning.
I did some back tests for many methods here. I am not convinced that people are winning relying on one method or technique. It takes some mix match of methods to arrive at some good numbers to play.
United States
Member #164,717
March 12, 2015
3,507 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by seeker-* on Oct 3, 2016
The LottoGuy has his own system that he sells.
Why would he give a good rating to a competitor?
He does? Show me where he sells his own product. He has a free course for anyone who wants it. I just checked his site out to see If you were correct, and I see no advertising at all.
Texas United States
Member #150,788
December 31, 2013
824 Posts
Offline
Beware of confusing "The Lottery Guy" with "Lotto Guy". The latter sells a system. The former provides lottery tips, reviews of lotto systems and also organizes lotto syndicates (of which I assume he takes a cut).
"There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe."