Reno, NV United States
Member #173,296
February 25, 2016
337 Posts
Offline
You can use a computer or pick out numbered ping pong balls from a hat, and the probability of winning is exactly the same. The numbered ping pong balls drawn from a hat would be more fun though.
bgonçalves Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,781 Posts
Offline
hellotucker, you are not taking into account the synchronism of patterns, by position, of your cycle of repetitions in the position.
ex-sequence 01 02 03 04 05 06, is less likely to leave
of 01 15 24 36 42 56, due to its positional position within the matrix within the two sequels to which the first
will be drawn and several times it is the 2nd sequence (01 15 24 36 42 56) by this in the central range of the bell curve, (gauss) is this that the computer has to cross patterns of statistics, automating, faster than human brain,
bgonçalves Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,781 Posts
Offline
hello tucker, I agree with you, when a ball is drawn only, chances are the same, but when they are drawn
5 or 6 balls forming a sequence, this is the difference, according to the size of the lottery, ex = in a lottery 49 x6
we have, doubles, triples quadruples and quintuples, each has its repetition cycle, so the difference is if it is a ball, chances are the same, if it is several ball the thing changes, this is what the algorithm will try to cross patterns to play in several draws. We then have dualities of repeated patterns and we have empty blocks or segments in the cartezian plane of the balls absent inside the matrix
bgonçalves Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,781 Posts
Offline
is it possible to create the statistical cross-over algorithm?
ex = we have, prime numbers, we have numbers absent from the last draw, odd and even, etc, would be another way to filter
or the algorithm search by pattern trend, defined, to play in several lucky algorithm selects the best trend for that monento for several raffles to play.
Australia
Member #191,908
August 27, 2018
151 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Oct 29, 2018
is it possible to create the statistical cross-over algorithm?
ex = we have, prime numbers, we have numbers absent from the last draw, odd and even, etc, would be another way to filter
or the algorithm search by pattern trend, defined, to play in several lucky algorithm selects the best trend for that monento for several raffles to play.
The problem is the statistical cross over.
Which statistical pattern applies at what time?
One pattern will point to one specific number, another will point to a different number .... etc. etc...add infinite.
This is the problem with statistics and the premises of the original question.
Both are wrong.
Patterns can be found in any historical data, structured and random numerical as well as text. These are historical patterns found using various statistical methods.
So any statistical algorithm will only reveal patterns within that past data set, it may on occasion come up with some short term probabilistic selection accuracy depending on which predictions various elements give and you accept.
This mighty algorithm will also be in conflict as it will come up with multiple solutions for a probabilistic outcome depending on the statistical approach and used, it will need a way to define which statistical approach rules in that instance.
Cuba
Member #192,109
September 8, 2018
4 Posts
Offline
Well currently i'm developing windows aplication that do something like that and i can predict for example yesterday is high probability that last digit be a 0 or a 1 or the middle digit a 9 yesterday work for the last 520 in floridda pick 3
bgonçalves Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,781 Posts
Offline
exact jake 1975, patterns have presence and cycle curves in positions, we can use pareto law where everything is 80/20 or 75/25 or you have 80% chance if you play this or that pattern, because crossing and synchronization of patterns is all
I would ask to test the one they know excel =
I suggest 5 stats and get a lottery draw
can be 49/6 and see which of the 5 stats or can be more
show which of them, hit
Australia
Member #191,908
August 27, 2018
151 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Oct 30, 2018
exact jake 1975, patterns have presence and cycle curves in positions, we can use pareto law where everything is 80/20 or 75/25 or you have 80% chance if you play this or that pattern, because crossing and synchronization of patterns is all
I would ask to test the one they know excel =
I suggest 5 stats and get a lottery draw
can be 49/6 and see which of the 5 stats or can be more
show which of them, hit
My existing program can predict 6 correct numbers from a play pool of 18 in a 6/45 game. Hit rate for this is random so can not financially afford to implement.
Does not use normal prediction methods based on statistics, I use a dynamic system that does not rely on curves and positions.
United States
Member #9,059
November 26, 2004
221 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Hydromaln7 on Oct 30, 2018
My existing program can predict 6 correct numbers from a play pool of 18 in a 6/45 game. Hit rate for this is random so can not financially afford to implement.
Does not use normal prediction methods based on statistics, I use a dynamic system that does not rely on curves and positions.
Maybe your secret system is related to this article.
florida United States
Member #178,722
December 13, 2016
42 Posts
Offline
A computer will never find a patern in the lottery because there is no such pattern. even if theere was a supposed pattern it is ruined with the 3 or 4 test draws done every drawing like in powerball. No computern in the lottery pattery
Australia
Member #191,908
August 27, 2018
151 Posts
Offline
Yeah now everyone knows it's a spoof paper.
Still a good exercise in making people think about what they read and not just take supposed "facts" on face value.
Unfortunately in Lottery player land there is a kind of desperation that drives people to accept anything that they think will enhance their chances of winning.
A lucky Budda, a favorite number set, a favorite location to buy tickets at, the weather, a snake oil salesman's amazing winning lottery number program .......... the list goes on.
So many people throw good money at illogical hope, if they sat down and started from scratch trying to work it out they would soon find that it is all rubbish, mainly because it is all based on static data.
Unlike my AMD (Amazing Dynamic Method ), which works.... kinda.