So I've been working on a number of number prediction systems for the last 5 years.
I have spent the last 4 weeks doing this full time.
If anyone has done any serious numbers analysis they will understand the rabbit hole that this leads to, it seems that for every potential number combination outcome for a lotto game i.e 6/45 there are an equal number of potential ways to analyse the way that those numbers came up.
This seems to be the bane of EVERY number prediction system in the world, a lot of systems seem to come up with a set of numbers from which you can then wheel through combinations that you like the look f or that meet specific requirements of past statistical results. Still a big lucky dip effect.
Sure some softwares and systems come up with a result now and then and they are sure to make sure that everyone knows that their "special sauce" was why it worked. But in this game consistency is the key and duplicating their "special sauce" results never seems to happen.
Conversely you get systems that do appear to give some consistency in the results by way of hitting 3, 4 and sometimes more numbers consistently over time from a recommended number set or sets.
But to date I have not seen a number set generator that actually can achieve consistent and high winning number hits from a recommended number set.
Until now.
As above I have been working on this for over 5 years, as a side note please look at Lotto Architect site and Anastasio's PDF write up on his findings from lotto analysis. It very much gells with my thinking.
According to his findings he has claimed to have found a "fingerprint" so to speak in the numbers via some possible proprietary historical analysis algorithm. And then their is the Lotto Rainbow guy who has found a clustering effect that he has colour coded to help select "groups" of potential number outcomes.
Both these guys are way more qualified than me for statistical analysis and have used some cleaver statistical observations to derive a playing method that is built into a software system.
So I looked at what these guys did and figured that if these guru's could come to the conclusion that something is driving some kind of patterns in teh lotto then maybe I should look a bot harder. And I did.
What I found was that there is a number of patterns that occur in ALL lotto games. After years of being told that there where NO patterns in lotto results and that they are all random I can prove that they are random but also that the random results DO follow patterns.
What I did was to look at the numbers differently, to look at what DID NOT happen as much as what DID happen.
My results?
So far I have been able to consistently reduce the number play set from a 6/45 game down to a 6/22 game.
The resulting 22 number consistently come up with weekly multiple winning number hits of between 3 to 6 numbers.
3 numbers from a group of 22 numbers has so far has been my minimum hit against drawn numbers and occurs every week.
4/22 is approx every 3rd week.
5/22 is approx every 8th week.
6/22 is approx every 14th week.
Now as you know you can not play 22 numbers and even if I could the cost would be prohibitive over a +14 week play cycle. But I do believe I have stumbled across something here that can be further refined.
I am still playing but now pick my numbers from the 22 that come from my approach, hopefully I have significantly increased my odd of winning over time with this number cycle system I have found.
As for the system, I am not going to divulge what it is just yet, I am thinking that if it pans out the way I think it will then it will revolutionise how we look at random numbers and laws of averages. Not just for lotto systems but across multiple analysis of numbers, I can already envisage using it for stocks analyses and similar as well as potentially another way for AI systems to make decisions based on data inputs.
There is no new math involved in what I am doing, just a very different way of looking at the results and outcomes of the "random" numbers.