IHeartMath and Oate
Thanks for posting.
I offer the following as constructive criticism made without malice.
Great charts. Lots of useful data.
However, as far as I can tell, the charts have one major flaw - no guideposts that would help
a User identify the best pairs or triples to play.
Should I choose data having the higher inventory count?
Or maybe, I should choose data with a low count?
Or, should I choose a mix?
What and where are the 'triggers' that would help me decide?
FWIW
My definition of 'triggers' are 'Alpha Equivalents.'
For example.
If my tracking charts suggest that the next winning "Alpha" could be, repeat, could be 'AABDG',
I would 'handpick' two single digits, one Teen, one number from the 30s and one number from the 60s.
I have tracking charts that would help me make the best selections.
FYI
The 'Alpha Equivalent' for the 0118 drawing is AEEGG, or, 2-43-48-62-64.
Yes, generating the Alphas is a lot of work, but, worth the effort, in my opinion.
I don't play the jackpot games but I do maintain Alpha data for the Friday drawing.
I have a son-in-law who is a software engineer.
I believe he will one day come to believe that a 5 of 5 win is possible. He will then
organize an 8-member 'pool' and give it a try.
One final thought.
MINIMUM PLAY
History shows that most jackpot winners won with a single combination from a Random Number Generator.
Yes, a single combination constructed with the aide of Alphas could win, but, the better minimum play is 8 combinations.
Here is my list for the Friday only drawings:
AABDF
ABBCE
ACDEF
ADEFG
ABCDH
BCFGG
BDDEG
CCEEF
These are revised as necessary depending on winning combinations.
Good luck!