Helping others learn how to winPrev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

Are you an expert in teaching others how to win the lottery?

Yes!

[ 8 ]

[ 30.8% ]

No. I'm not a good teacher.

[ 3 ]

[ 11.5% ]

No. I don't know how to win

[ 11 ]

[ 42.3% ]

I dunno

[ 1 ]

[ 3.8% ]

Kinda

[ 3 ]

[ 11.5% ]

Total valid votes

[ 26 ]

Discarded votes

[ 5 ]

Stack47

Kentucky
United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,530 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 4:02 pm

Quote: Originally posted by britwill on May 27, 2021
Stack47, I'm ok with answering your questions, but be fair and answer my questions or share your strategy. Wouldn't you agree all are better served if we discussed how to win?

The purpose of the poll was to [once again] flush out the experts and have a meeting of the minds and a sharing of winning ideas. Still confused why I'm the only one sharing my ideas/strategies. Nevertheless, if this is a community discussion shouldn't we be talking about how to win? I think most would agree we all know what losing feels like.

Pro tip: If you want to learn how to win focus on why you lost. "I never lose. I either win or I learn -Mandela"

Per your statements:

How does adding extra drawings effect the next drawing? Answer: That's not the question you really want to ask. Revised: How does adding extra drawings effect your next win? The extra drawings have added more data. I've communicated a data-driven approach all along. More data means more patterns. It also mean less spend. In FL, if the data pulls anything anything before 2005 there are less numbers to play which equals less spend. The drawings by themselves mean nothing if you can't find a winning pattern.

How do extra ball features effect the next drawing? Answer: I'm guessing you don't have this feature in your state, but again that's not the question. Revised: How do extra ball features effect the next win? Answer: Jury's still out. I have not included the extra ball in my strategy, but my state added it as a means to have more wins. I'm not an authority on the extra ball yet, but I plan to be. Stay tuned.

"I don't have time to post daily predictions" But you have the time to teach people how to win? Answer: You're conflating independent themes and misinterpreting the context of my post. Posting daily predictions and teaching others how to win Pick lottery are not synonymous. Besides, my time is valuable. I don't have time to post daily predictions because it's fruitless. And, we both know that because we've been members here for a long time and following daily predictions have not resulted in positive ratios. You said it yourself below.

"Only five "all states pick 3" predictors have a positive prize ratio all time and in the last 30 drawings. The Florida predictors are doing slightly better. The best pick 3 predictor (IMO), ThatScaryChick wagered $2000 to win $1600. The Florida last 30 days predictors are doing OK, but not so good life time. Answer: I have not verified but I'll take your word for it.

My point is you're making the same type of claims I saw many times in the last 15 years on LP and they always end the same. The person is either trying to sell a system or is suffering from delusions of grandeur. Answer: You and I are in the same boat (well, maybe not me anymore). I followed the daily posters too. And where did that get us? The reason I have been asking polling questions is to communicate I know what it feels like to: 1) Lose consecutively 2) Buy systems that don't work 3) Hope and pray my cousin's sister's birthday hits 4) Follow ppl with delusions of grandeur making outrageous claims. The difference: I haven't sold you anything, but I have shared my methods freely. Caveat: If I ever do sell something the wins will be in the $10K range as I have done and shown.

BTW, you forgot to answer my question, "overcoming the more than 50% house edge"?" Answer: Respectfully, I don't agree with this calculation so I won't speak on it. Create a poll question for it.

"what I propose is mentoring a bettor from each state to guarantee a max win." Answer: Yes.

Here's a freebie:

I took a look at your state (KY) midday yesterday for Pick3, and there were low-hanging fruit.

Looking at this way (by post):

05/25/2021 - 05/26/2021: *[258 632 010] (* this means nothing by itself because you can't see any patterns.)

1991-06 - 1991-10 But looking at it this way (by date) would have given you a win.

000 000 300 030 090 009 105 015 601 106 402 402 054 405 907 097 112 112 212 122 132 312 132 152 512 612 162 182 812 192 192 912 912 232 322 322 422 242 242 242 622 622 822 822 822 922 922 922 292 292 332 332 332 532 352 352 732 732 372 372 372 832 832 382 832 832 832 392 392 932 392 932 932 392 442 442 442 442 542 542 542 472 472 482 482 492 492 552 552 562 652 652 652 562 752 572 752 572 572 572 572 572 572 952 592 862 682 862 862 692 692 872 872 782 872 872 882 882 992 992 992

I would continue to look here.

-Will

"Pro tip: If you want to learn how to win focus on why you lost."

If someone asks me how to win, the first thing I'll say is: Over time 99% of pick-3 and pick-4 players will lose because the payouts are less than 50 cents on the dollar. The are 1000 possible three digit combos and players collect $500 for a $1 straight hit on any one of them. An actual "win" is $499 because the lottery keeps the buck you spent on the ticket.

"How does adding extra drawings effect the next drawing? Answer: That's not the question you really want to ask."

You said you're an "expert" so I didn't think is was necessary to say "effect the next random drawing".

"Posting daily predictions and teaching others how to win Pick lottery are not synonymous."

Without any successful predictions how are we suppose to know if anyone is an expert?

I can go to the local cashing agent, get several high amount "already paid" scratch-offs, post them here and pretend I won thousands of dollars. And the only thing I'd prove is that I'm an expert at trying to fool people. I've hit 22% of the 340,000 All-or-Nothing predictions I made with only a 47.25% prize ratio. At best, I can claim bragging rights because I'm averaging the "overall chances of winning something" and "winning" about what I should be after deducting the house edge.

"The extra drawings have added more data."

Doesn't a random drawings produce random data? An expert can get the same data by calculating probability plus or minus standard deviation.

"I'm guessing you don't have this feature in your state, but again that's not the question."

Nope but we had a "one off" betting option. The key words are "betting option" because just like with "fireball", neither has any effect on the three digit drawing. Both PB and MM offer secondary prize multipliers betting options that have zero effect on the actual drawing. If you played 246 straight for $1, how exactly did the fireball 9 effect your bet and/or chances of winning?

"BTW, you forgot to answer my question, "overcoming the more than 50% house edge"?" Answer: Respectfully, I don't agree with this calculation so I won't speak on it."

If you're really an expert, you ought to know how calculate things like the house edge and probability. Hint: the house edge is the difference between what a bet should pay based on the odds and what the house pays.

"this means nothing by itself because you can't see any patterns."

What type of pattern are we looking for?

Dr San mentioned looking for patterns several time without ever identifying any. I'll be ecstatic if you can give an example of just one pattern to look for.

"Some people have something to say while other people feel the need to say something"
britwill

United States
Member #153,831
March 27, 2014
516 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 4:07 pm

Quote: Originally posted by britwill on May 27, 2021
Stack47, I'm ok with answering your questions, but be fair and answer my questions or share your strategy. Wouldn't you agree all are better served if we discussed how to win?

The purpose of the poll was to [once again] flush out the experts and have a meeting of the minds and a sharing of winning ideas. Still confused why I'm the only one sharing my ideas/strategies. Nevertheless, if this is a community discussion shouldn't we be talking about how to win? I think most would agree we all know what losing feels like.

Pro tip: If you want to learn how to win focus on why you lost. "I never lose. I either win or I learn -Mandela"

Per your statements:

How does adding extra drawings effect the next drawing? Answer: That's not the question you really want to ask. Revised: How does adding extra drawings effect your next win? The extra drawings have added more data. I've communicated a data-driven approach all along. More data means more patterns. It also mean less spend. In FL, if the data pulls anything anything before 2005 there are less numbers to play which equals less spend. The drawings by themselves mean nothing if you can't find a winning pattern.

How do extra ball features effect the next drawing? Answer: I'm guessing you don't have this feature in your state, but again that's not the question. Revised: How do extra ball features effect the next win? Answer: Jury's still out. I have not included the extra ball in my strategy, but my state added it as a means to have more wins. I'm not an authority on the extra ball yet, but I plan to be. Stay tuned.

"I don't have time to post daily predictions" But you have the time to teach people how to win? Answer: You're conflating independent themes and misinterpreting the context of my post. Posting daily predictions and teaching others how to win Pick lottery are not synonymous. Besides, my time is valuable. I don't have time to post daily predictions because it's fruitless. And, we both know that because we've been members here for a long time and following daily predictions have not resulted in positive ratios. You said it yourself below.

"Only five "all states pick 3" predictors have a positive prize ratio all time and in the last 30 drawings. The Florida predictors are doing slightly better. The best pick 3 predictor (IMO), ThatScaryChick wagered $2000 to win $1600. The Florida last 30 days predictors are doing OK, but not so good life time. Answer: I have not verified but I'll take your word for it.

My point is you're making the same type of claims I saw many times in the last 15 years on LP and they always end the same. The person is either trying to sell a system or is suffering from delusions of grandeur. Answer: You and I are in the same boat (well, maybe not me anymore). I followed the daily posters too. And where did that get us? The reason I have been asking polling questions is to communicate I know what it feels like to: 1) Lose consecutively 2) Buy systems that don't work 3) Hope and pray my cousin's sister's birthday hits 4) Follow ppl with delusions of grandeur making outrageous claims. The difference: I haven't sold you anything, but I have shared my methods freely. Caveat: If I ever do sell something the wins will be in the $10K range as I have done and shown.

BTW, you forgot to answer my question, "overcoming the more than 50% house edge"?" Answer: Respectfully, I don't agree with this calculation so I won't speak on it. Create a poll question for it.

"what I propose is mentoring a bettor from each state to guarantee a max win." Answer: Yes.

Here's a freebie:

I took a look at your state (KY) midday yesterday for Pick3, and there were low-hanging fruit.

Looking at this way (by post):

05/25/2021 - 05/26/2021: *[258 632 010] (* this means nothing by itself because you can't see any patterns.)

1991-06 - 1991-10 But looking at it this way (by date) would have given you a win.

000 000 300 030 090 009 105 015 601 106 402 402 054 405 907 097 112 112 212 122 132 312 132 152 512 612 162 182 812 192 192 912 912 232 322 322 422 242 242 242 622 622 822 822 822 922 922 922 292 292 332 332 332 532 352 352 732 732 372 372 372 832 832 382 832 832 832 392 392 932 392 932 932 392 442 442 442 442 542 542 542 472 472 482 482 492 492 552 552 562 652 652 652 562 752 572 752 572 572 572 572 572 572 952 592 862 682 862 862 692 692 872 872 782 872 872 882 882 992 992 992

I would continue to look here.

-Will

Lottery Family (Update):

Here's the beauty of what I posted earlier @ 7:53am est.

Here's a freebie:

I took a look at your state (KY) midday yesterday for Pick3, and there were low-hanging fruit.

Looking at this way (by post):

05/25/2021 - 05/26/2021: *[258 632 010] (* this means nothing by itself because you can't see any patterns.)

1991-06 - 1991-10 But looking at it this way (by date) would have given you a win.

000 000 300 030 090 009 105 015 601 106 402 402 054 405 907 097 112 112 212 122 132 312 132 152 512 612 162 182 812 192 192 912 912 232 322 322 422 242 242 242 622 622 822 822 822 922 922 922 292 292 332 332 332 532 352 352 732 732 372 372 372 832 832 382 832 832 832 392 392 932 392 932 932 392 442 442 442 442 542 542 542 472 472 482 482 492 492 552 552 562 652 652 652 562 752 572 752 572 572 572 572 572 572 952 592 862 682 862 862 692 692 872 872 782 872 872 882 882 992 992 992

I would continue to look here. <== *** And, I explicitly said this ***

Guess what the winning number was for KY midday.

Funny how that keeps happening.

-Will

"There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe." ~Robert A. Heinlein
Stack47

Kentucky
United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,530 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 4:21 pm

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 27, 2021
Albert Einstein had just administered an examination to an advanced class of Physics students.

As he left the building, he was followed out by one of his teaching assistants.

"Excuse me, sir," said the shy assistant, not quite sure how to tell the great man about his blunder.

"Yes?" said Einstein.

"Um, eh, it's about the test you just handed out."

Einstein waited patiently.

"I'm not sure that you realize it, but this is the same test you gave out last year. In fact, it's identical."

Einstein paused to think for a moment, then said, "Hmm, yes, it is the same test."

The teaching assistant was now very agitated. "What should we do, sir?"

A slow smile spread over Einstein's face. "I don't think we need do anything. The answers have changed."

And just as the answers in Physics change, so, too, do the answers to your lottery change.

While to all appearances you may have the same tests given to you by the lottery, the same recurring problem, consider the possibility that the person contemplating the problem has changed.

Time has passed; you've learned many things along the way.

Rather than keep on trying to force the same old solutions which didn't work before, it might be time to try something else, something that emerges from the new person that you've become.

The tests may be the same, but the answers have changed with every draw.

BobP

Remembering when touts would stand outside the casinos offering to show people how to win if they'd be willing
to split the winnings to learn.

"And just as the answers in Physics change,"

The last time I looked there were 15 laws of Physics and to my knowledge none have changed. We still can't mix water and oil.

"so, too, do the answers to your lottery change."

As long as it remains at ten digits 0 to 9, in the next five pick-3 drawings, one to five of those digits will be drawn in the first drawing position. And if the drawing is truly random, how could anyone predict whether one digit will be drawn all five drawings, five different digits, or any combination of less than 4 digits?

"Remembering when touts"

They still sell "tip sheets" at race tracks.

"Some people have something to say while other people feel the need to say something"
zteur

Toledo Ohio
United States
Member #3,472
January 23, 2004
39 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 4:53 pm

If one would take the time to go back and read all of Britwill's post ,he has already explained his method. But that would give you something to work on and maybe see the light as he has.Do some home work it will make you proud.
britwill

United States
Member #153,831
March 27, 2014
516 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 5:27 pm

"Pro tip: If you want to learn how to win focus on why you lost."

If someone asks me how to win, the first thing I'll say is: Over time 99% of pick-3 and pick-4 players will lose because the payouts are less than 50 cents on the dollar. The are 1000 possible three digit combos and players collect $500 for a $1 straight hit on any one of them. An actual "win" is $499 because the lottery keeps the buck you spent on the ticket. Answer2: That's what you'd tell them, first? Ok, what's the 2nd thing you'd advise?

"How does adding extra drawings effect the next drawing? Answer: That's not the question you really want to ask."

You said you're an "expert" so I didn't think is was necessary to say "effect the next random drawing". Answer2: So, you're in agreement with me?

"Posting daily predictions and teaching others how to win Pick lottery are not synonymous."

Without any successful predictions how are we suppose to know if anyone is an expert? Answer2: Stack47, you haven't been following my posts. I've been posting winning methods the whole time. I just did another one for your state. Check it out because it was based on historical data.

I can go to the local cashing agent, get several high amount "already paid" scratch-offs, post them here and pretend I won thousands of dollars. And the only thing I'd prove is that I'm an expert at trying to fool people. I've hit 22% of the 340,000 All-or-Nothing predictions I made with only a 47.25% prize ratio. At best, I can claim bragging rights because I'm averaging the "overall chances of winning something" and "winning" about what I should be after deducting the house edge. Answer2: True. But that's not what I'm doing. Wait. Do you think I'm posting tickets from other winners?

"The extra drawings have added more data."

Doesn't a random drawings produce random data? Answer2: If you look at the data singularly, it appears random. Over time it forms a pattern. An expert can get the same data by calculating probability plus or minus standard deviation. Answer2: That's the beauty about being an expert you get to choose the tools. Although they're related, I choose to study the frequency of the picks, not their probability.

"I'm guessing you don't have this feature in your state, but again that's not the question."

Nope but we had a "one off" betting option. The key words are "betting option" because just like with "fireball", neither has any effect on the three digit drawing. Both PB and MM offer secondary prize multipliers betting options that have zero effect on the actual drawing. If you played 246 straight for $1, how exactly did the fireball 9 effect your bet and/or chances of winning? Answer2. I don't play fireball.

"BTW, you forgot to answer my question, "overcoming the more than 50% house edge"?" Answer: Respectfully, I don't agree with this calculation so I won't speak on it."

If you're really an expert, you ought to know how calculate things like the house edge and probability. Hint: the house edge is the difference between what a bet should pay based on the odds and what the house pays. Answer2: I do know how to calculate probability and thanks for the refresher for those who didn't know.

"this means nothing by itself because you can't see any patterns."

What type of pattern are we looking for? Answer2: Please see my latest post.

Dr San mentioned looking for patterns several time without ever identifying any. I'll be ecstatic if you can give an example of just one pattern to look for. Answer2: I gave you one. Please see earlier post.

"There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe." ~Robert A. Heinlein
britwill

United States
Member #153,831
March 27, 2014
516 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 5:38 pm

Quote: Originally posted by zteur on May 27, 2021
If one would take the time to go back and read all of Britwill's post ,he has already explained his method. But that would give you something to work on and maybe see the light as he has.Do some home work it will make you proud.

Thanks, zteur!

"There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe." ~Robert A. Heinlein
grwurston

100

Same digits. Different games.

United States
Member #90,245
April 24, 2010
17,074 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 6:55 pm

"Pro tip: If you want to learn how to win focus on why you lost."

Exactly.

Before you play there are 2 choices to make. Low sum or high sum and consecutive pair or no consecutive pair. Choose correctly and you go from 120 combos down to 30. Not a bad starting point.
AnythngPossible

east cost
United States
Member #209,328
August 29, 2020
113 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 7:02 pm

Quote: Originally posted by britwill on May 27, 2021
Wondering how posting 5 to 10 number for each state or "state of the day" thing proves anything when posting playable predictions for their own state (Florida) makes much more sense? Answer: It only makes sense because we're all conditioned to believe it helps us win, when we all know it does not. Fact: If someone would start posting verifiable (something we call prove) things like patterns, we all would win more.

Ex: These are the pick3 draws from your state: 4/1/21 - 4/30/21

There's a pattern but you can't see it.

675 927 481 238 915 143 757 559 353 945 516 937 882 236 546 180 278 840 764 474 249 944 019 739 819 527 546 297 656 080 349 775 309 496 922 818 023 029 313 094 693 773 117 556 538 122 077 463 614 322 477 994 774 224 733 093 872 176 601 *705

Here's the pattern condensed

566 449 046 346 239 177 477 146 156 456 677 556 468 349 778 356 399 256 467 246 039 149 359 489 389 277 056 469 569 567 369 479 459 777 577 499 466 249 377 446 379 077 049 139 568 339 779

Here's the pattern-removing-past-wins [prpw]

046 239 177 677 468 778 356 399 256 246 149 359 489 389 277 056 569 479 777 466 446 139 568 339 779 [25 numbers]

If you had started playing [prpw] on 5/1/21: You would have been positive on 5/1/21.

059 865 204 186 312 074 915 027 348 656 143 054 417 860 283 143 857 622 253 201 296 431 776 401 466 628 676 192 206 394 738 235 462 235 124 276 597 909 981 274 874 747 886 230 385 641 095 556 258 632 010 *552

The wins are pretty spaced out so I would have kept adapting as the data did.

Clearly you see where I'm going with this.

-Will

" Fact: If someone would start posting verifiable (something we call prove) things like patterns, we all would win more."

Me personally i don't think anyone with some winning system that's,"Verifiable" will < no pun intended, be posting in a forum to help out the masses. Let's say i had a consistent winning system does is bode well for me to share it with the masses? Just asking.

The person that you are probably looking for by asking lp members to post their ideas may have or may not have accomplished what your attempting to figure out which is consistency, 8-13 years ago. You are the master? but carry on as a pupil.

The poster has left lots of clues and stopped posting years ago. I like basic filters but it's not a consistent system. I second the notion that i also do not see anyone on lp's leader boards as a master predictor for the stats of all the poster's in pick 3,4,5 say otherwise.

How can the masses test your winning system?, "Application."

we are here to help yes?

My system consists of

EEO OOE OEO OOO

EOE OEE EOO EEE

That is pick 3 pick 4 add the extra digit. eg 0000=EEEE, 1188=OOEE.

Track it how ever you like by past data permutations if you will.

Look for the past patterns they come and go. use a past calendar +/- 10 draws from begging of each and every current new month. use 1,2,3 and 4 years back max.

This is my system.

If i keep taking the same actions, same results occur.

timing plus luck plus quality - quantity = winner's circle
AnythngPossible

east cost
United States
Member #209,328
August 29, 2020
113 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 7:08 pm

Quote: Originally posted by britwill on May 27, 2021
Lottery Family (Update):

Here's the beauty of what I posted earlier @ 7:53am est.

Here's a freebie:

I took a look at your state (KY) midday yesterday for Pick3, and there were low-hanging fruit.

Looking at this way (by post):

05/25/2021 - 05/26/2021: *[258 632 010] (* this means nothing by itself because you can't see any patterns.)

1991-06 - 1991-10 But looking at it this way (by date) would have given you a win.

000 000 300 030 090 009 105 015 601 106 402 402 054 405 907 097 112 112 212 122 132 312 132 152 512 612 162 182 812 192 192 912 912 232 322 322 422 242 242 242 622 622 822 822 822 922 922 922 292 292 332 332 332 532 352 352 732 732 372 372 372 832 832 382 832 832 832 392 392 932 392 932 932 392 442 442 442 442 542 542 542 472 472 482 482 492 492 552 552 562 652 652 652 562 752 572 752 572 572 572 572 572 572 952 592 862 682 862 862 692 692 872 872 782 872 872 882 882 992 992 992

I would continue to look here. <== *** And, I explicitly said this ***

Guess what the winning number was for KY midday.

Funny how that keeps happening.

-Will

Dumb question coming. can you tell me the start date to start playing a set like the above example then when to stop playing it?

If i keep taking the same actions, same results occur.

timing plus luck plus quality - quantity = winner's circle
AnythngPossible

east cost
United States
Member #209,328
August 29, 2020
113 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 7:17 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Raven62 on May 26, 2021
As Malcolm Gladwell discussed in his bestseller, "Outliers", to become an expert it takes 10000 hours (or approximately 10 years) of deliberate practice. But deliberate practice is a specifically defined term. It involves goal setting, quick feedback, and countless drills to improve skills with an eye on mastery.

10 years of toil, yikes. Then when they show the results of those tens years of rote they make it look so easy, to the onlookers.

Outliers hah, hmmmm.

If i keep taking the same actions, same results occur.

timing plus luck plus quality - quantity = winner's circle
britwill

United States
Member #153,831
March 27, 2014
516 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 7:35 pm

Quote: Originally posted by AnythngPossible on May 27, 2021
" Fact: If someone would start posting verifiable (something we call prove) things like patterns, we all would win more."

Me personally i don't think anyone with some winning system that's,"Verifiable" will < no pun intended, be posting in a forum to help out the masses. Let's say i had a consistent winning system does is bode well for me to share it with the masses? Just asking.

The person that you are probably looking for by asking lp members to post their ideas may have or may not have accomplished what your attempting to figure out which is consistency, 8-13 years ago. You are the master? but carry on as a pupil.

The poster has left lots of clues and stopped posting years ago. I like basic filters but it's not a consistent system. I second the notion that i also do not see anyone on lp's leader boards as a master predictor for the stats of all the poster's in pick 3,4,5 say otherwise.

How can the masses test your winning system?, "Application."

we are here to help yes?

My system consists of

EEO OOE OEO OOO

EOE OEE EOO EEE

That is pick 3 pick 4 add the extra digit. eg 0000=EEEE, 1188=OOEE.

Track it how ever you like by past data permutations if you will.

Look for the past patterns they come and go. use a past calendar +/- 10 draws from begging of each and every current new month. use 1,2,3 and 4 years back max.

This is my system.

Hi AP-

Me personally i don't think anyone with some winning system that's,"Verifiable" will < no pun intended, be posting in a forum to help out the masses. Let's say i had a consistent winning system does is bode well for me to share it with the masses? Just asking. Answer: Yes. I've explained that already (Helping others indirectly/directly always helps you) Universal fact!

The person that you are probably looking for by asking lp members to post their ideas may have or may not have accomplished what your attempting to figure out which is consistency, 8-13 years ago. You are the master? but carry on as a pupil. Answer: Yes. I consider myself an authority and still a student of the lottery because I am open to knowledge.

The poster has left lots of clues and stopped posting years ago. I like basic filters but it's not a consistent system. I second the notion that i also do not see anyone on lp's leader boards as a master predictor for the stats of all the poster's in pick 3,4,5 say otherwise.

How can the masses test your winning system?, "Application." Answer: Putting finishing touches on it. Stay tuned.

This is my system. Answer: Can you share recent wins with your system/state? Please provide enumerated steps to reproduce your wins.

"There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe." ~Robert A. Heinlein
britwill

United States
Member #153,831
March 27, 2014
516 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 7:39 pm

Quote: Originally posted by AnythngPossible on May 27, 2021
Dumb question coming. can you tell me the start date to start playing a set like the above example then when to stop playing it?

"Dumb question coming. can you tell me the start date to start playing a set like the above example then when to stop playing it? Answer: Not a dumb question. The data changes so change with it. Create a new report based on the new data. Please see earlier posts.

"There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe." ~Robert A. Heinlein
AnythngPossible

east cost
United States
Member #209,328
August 29, 2020
113 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 7:46 pm

Quote: Originally posted by britwill on May 27, 2021
Hi AP-

Me personally i don't think anyone with some winning system that's,"Verifiable" will < no pun intended, be posting in a forum to help out the masses. Let's say i had a consistent winning system does is bode well for me to share it with the masses? Just asking. Answer: Yes. I've explained that already (Helping others indirectly/directly always helps you) Universal fact!

The person that you are probably looking for by asking lp members to post their ideas may have or may not have accomplished what your attempting to figure out which is consistency, 8-13 years ago. You are the master? but carry on as a pupil. Answer: Yes. I consider myself an authority and still a student of the lottery because I am open to knowledge.

The poster has left lots of clues and stopped posting years ago. I like basic filters but it's not a consistent system. I second the notion that i also do not see anyone on lp's leader boards as a master predictor for the stats of all the poster's in pick 3,4,5 say otherwise.

How can the masses test your winning system?, "Application." Answer: Putting finishing touches on it. Stay tuned.

This is my system. Answer: Can you share recent wins with your system/state? Please provide enumerated steps to reproduce your wins.

This is my system. Answer: Can you share recent wins with your system/state? Please provide enumerated steps to reproduce your wins

Unfortunately it is not a consistent winning system and i only paper play. The instructions were already given.

If i keep taking the same actions, same results occur.

timing plus luck plus quality - quantity = winner's circle
AllenB

California
United States
Member #167,120
June 27, 2015
1,777 Posts
Offline

May 27, 2021, 10:39 pm

I am currently taking a break from all things related to the Lottery. I check in to the Discussion Forum to see what’s happening at LP; but I have stopped building Lottery Tools. The main reason is the amount of time that it takes to dig into the data and set up an Excel Workbook and a part time job that has grown despite the pandemic. The 4-6 hours a day that used to be Lottery is now 6-8 hours a day doing Land Surveying.

I “retired” in 2015. I began studying the Lottery at that time. I began with California Fantasy 5. I built a complete history of the Game expressed in codes derived from a long list of Filters. Codes for a 5 Draw Game are a 5-digit series of the Filter Value Options for each position and a Summary code that counts the Values in each draw. The Tool is set up to allow me to play any Filter Value in any position and produces all possible combinations that match. For example, I could play the Odd/Even code in positions 1 and 4 together with a Low-Medium-High (I call this Thirds) in positions 3 and 5 with a 5^th Value in position 2, Or I can combine codes and play an Odd-Low in position 1 etc. These are a few of the “Fixed” Filters (meaning they do not change the Inventory associated with the Filter Values or Series. Other Fixed Filter options such “is it a Fibonacci Number” (0=No, 1=Yes), First Digit (0,1,2,3), Last Digit, Sums (net and root). Plus, several more.

Another set of Filters derived from Skips and Frequency are available. I’ve got about every filter that you can think of (many found here on LP) built into a set of workbooks that lets me look at time graphs for filter values by position and series values, make selections (based on a guess) and look at the output of combinations that pass thru the filters. Each Filter can be set to include or exclude the numbers matching the Value Guess.

I know that there are several members that have a similar Process. I have explained this process many times as it has evolved from 2015. I have often commented that it was the Excel Challenge that drove my pursuit and that I rarely play the game. I will admit now that it is the Game that I want to Win. The Fact is that my Tool is complete and has been for several months. All I have to do is update the draws and it is ready to go. I also have the same Tool for Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Another reason for the Break is that no matter how tight the tool is, it still comes down to a Guess. To get to a Playable Inventory, it takes at least 2 different Filter Values guesses for each Position and 1 or 2 Series Guesses.

You see that word “Guess”? So far it is nothing but a feeling and wrong more than right. I am admitting that I do not use what Stats calls Probability Math. I have managed to get past the Conspiracy Stuff enough to be interested in what Stats has to say, if he would explain himself. So, if the answer is right in front of those that will see, when I get back at this, I am going to study Probability and more particularly Likelihood. Seems to me that these codes can be looked at in this way and hopefully produces more winners.

There are several experts here on LP. One thing that you will notice is that many of these experts began their LP Experience trying to help others. You have to look past the Loafers that only say “Can You do my State”? These folks just want help. When you do put something up to help, you get a few members that just want to take and not give anything in return. With a complicated system you end up spending all of your time on “Customer Service”. Eventually you stop trying to help everyone and if you are lucky find someone to work with privately that adds value to your process.
zteur

Toledo Ohio
United States
Member #3,472
January 23, 2004
39 Posts
Offline

May 28, 2021, 12:08 am

Britwill Thread 336540/ 1 to16 is good homework for your answer to his system.

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Helping others learn how to winPrev TopicNext Topic

Helping others learn how to winPrev Topic Next Topic