I just finished another study of Lottery Post vs Terminal quick picks. Similar to my Louisiana Lotto study, over the course of 20 drawings, I played a terminal quick pick and a Lottery Post quick pick side by side to see what the results would be. One thing that made this study different was I was actually watching 2 sets of numbers, the five white balls and the red Powerball. Here are the results of my study.
The average number of white balls matched per drawing was 0.2 for Lottery Post and 0.1 for the terminal. The median and the mode for both was 0. In other words, a majority of the drawings for both methods ended up not matching any of the white balls.
The Standard Deviations were 0.410391 for Lottery Post and 0.307794 for the terminal, not a very big difference.
As for the Powerball, the Terminal quick pick hit 4 times while the Lottery Post quick picks didn't match it at all. 20% of the terminal quick picks hit the Powerball and 0% of the Lottery Post quick picks did.
For the white balls, the Lottery Post quick picks appear to have had a slight edge, but not by much over the Terminal quick picks. For the red Powerball, Terminal quick picks did much better.
I'm not sure what to conclude from this other than it appears that the Terminal quick pick has a better chance of winning a lower tier prize by matching the Powerball than Lottery Post does. The results of my Louisiana Lotto study were actually quite different showing Lottery Post with the edge. One thing to note on this is Powerball is still using ball drawings while Louisiana Lotto is using computerized drawings. I wonder if there is a connection between the differing results, or if it is simply the odds, or something else.
I'm planning another study like this on MegaMillions and will post the results when I get it done.
I hope this is interesting to all of you and I look forward to your comments.