bliss United States
Member #176,314
July 31, 2016
26,499 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Nodda4me on Jun 4, 2024
I think I've answered my own question. LOL! Here's what I think is happening. My program is "scoring" each frame on the fly, by which I mean that my program is attempting to calculate the winnings ($2230 in this case) and choose the highest prize money winning frame whereas your program is scoring each frame by the total number of hits and choosing the "winner" as the frame with the highest number of hits.. Am I correct?
That would definitely be the most logical explanation, and most likely correct! lol
I set it for straights only and for 36 draws like your example, this is the first that popped up without editing anything else, which is the same time frame you posted.
I had a concern it wasn't counting the straights with boxes if a straight is hit, but looking at the numbers below, 800 green on left and right, and 008 blue, so it is working correctly.
I had a concern it wasn't counting the straights with boxes if a straight is hit, but looking at the numbers below, 800 green on left and right, and 008 blue, so it is working correctly.
Bingo! Same problem here. I wrestled with the code but never got mine 100% correct, which is driving me crazy...
Here's the thing:
I followed the Correlation workup for about a year and came to the conclusion that it falls into the realm of stuff that is fun to know after the fact, but I never made any money with it, so I stopped spending a lot of time on it. However, I have settled on the following use for the Maximum Correlation workup. Every day, after I do a summary of all the main workups, I take the hot numbers, and make a RegEx search term out of them. Then I do a meta-workup where I search all the sub-reports, including the approx. 3500 line Correlation report from top to bottom, looking at the raw output of every little workup, and there are a lot of them, hunting for a number that pops. Then, I close the loop by searching all the reports again after the draw looking for the draw number straight, hoping to catch a developing trend. That's how I originally discovered that straight Date workup hits were clustering in a semi-regular way. The Followers haven't been very fruitful so I've pushed them down in priority in the meta-workup, and pushed the Sync workups higher and I still follow all the other workups (Correlation, Backcheck, Last Years's Date, Sync, Sync Map, Irrationals, Watchlist, Lookahead Workups, and the Oracle), hoping to catch a trend that will drive some moneymaking.
