New York United States
Member #203,701
January 14, 2020
380 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stat$talker on Nov 9, 2024
"You don't need in-depth knowledge of statistics neither, although this can help."
Curious?.. What "in-depth" level of understanding Statistics would you deem basic enough?, since full knowledge is deemed not necessary.
There is no in-depth knowledge of statistics that you need, but there are a couple of things that are relevant. You need a knowledge of Probability and the hit frequency for whatever you're playing. It is helpful to know about relative or empirical frequency which is what I use. The sampling I use goes back many years and ideally you would want to use the entire history of draws for the state. The more data you have the better. I also use concepts I haven't ever seen in Statistics that I have developed myself.
Ontario Canada
Member #109,236
April 9, 2011
61,309 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Pick3geniu$ on Nov 9, 2024
There is no in-depth knowledge of statistics that you need, but there are a couple of things that are relevant. You need a knowledge of Probability and the hit frequency for whatever you're playing. It is helpful to know about relative or empirical frequency which is what I use. The sampling I use goes back many years and ideally you would want to use the entire history of draws for the state. The more data you have the better. I also use concepts I haven't ever seen in Statistics that I have developed myself.
I've used All History (empirical) stats a lot in the beginning,
but lately I've been playing more recent history(relative).
These are just 2 charts
1st is all draws history
2nd is draws from the past year
Do you stick with the more recent draws or the other numbers by position,
Or do you switch em up depending on Day/Eve stats?
New York United States
Member #203,701
January 14, 2020
380 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoBux on Nov 9, 2024
I've used All History (empirical) stats a lot in the beginning,
but lately I've been playing more recent history(relative).
These are just 2 charts
1st is all draws history
2nd is draws from the past year
Do you stick with the more recent draws or the other numbers by position,
Or do you switch em up depending on Day/Eve stats?
I use recent draws for patterns since patterns are temporary and short term. I don't track numbers by position at all though. I have all 1000 numbers broken down into smaller groups on three levels as shown in the tree diagram. The Even Low and Odd High groups on the third level are small enough to play and are the majority groups on that level.
The groups are tracked on all 3 levels with regard to patterns in this 2nd image here. Patterns involving all singles and all repeating numbers are on the 1st level. Patterns involving all even singles and all odd singles are on the 2nd level. Patterns involving even low and even high on the third level and patterns involving odd high and odd low also on the 3rd level. The Number Type(NT) shown is the group of interest. The stats given show how well the patterns are performing. For example, If I was to hypothetically play all 720 singles, then I could see how well I would do using each of the 8 patterns on the primary level. The expected win percentage is 72% and you would compare this with the Empirical Win Percentage(EWP) given. The Highest Consecutive Losses(HCL) gives you the highest number of consecutive losses seen for each pattern which is a loss due to a repeating number coming out. You can see what patterns are over performing or what patterns are under performing during the time up to the last draw entered.
The play methods at the bottom factor in all 3 levels and are what you actually use when playing. There are only 12 even low and odd high play blocks shown, but there are many more that aren't shown. Each individual even low and odd high play method in each play block has all 3 levels factored in. For example, you can see play method CHH 111 highlighted in yellow that reveals which patterns are being utilized on all 3 levels that are also highlighted in yellow. So, I might avoid using any play methods utilizing patterns that are under performing. There are play stats that are provided too for each individual play method. Only relevant play stats are shown.
There is also play protection (NPP, BPP, MPP, and SPP) that I keep emphasizing which protects you from losing streaks that could wipe you out with play protection increasing when going from left to right(e.g. from NPP to BPP). You have current consecutive losses(CCL) underneath this which is the current consecutive losses incurred when actually playing and then you have maximum consecutive losses(MCL) also underneath this which allows you to control the maximum number of consecutive losses incurred before you cut your losses and start over.
Nova Scotia Canada
Member #9,934
December 27, 2004
1,636 Posts
Offline
with the lottery I like to buy a ticket where I choose number's. As well there are day's where I will buy one from the cashier with what the machine chooses. I hope I have luck either way!
700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,507 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by Pick3geniu$ on Nov 9, 2024
There is no in-depth knowledge of statistics that you need, but there are a couple of things that are relevant. You need a knowledge of Probability and the hit frequency for whatever you're playing. It is helpful to know about relative or empirical frequency which is what I use. The sampling I use goes back many years and ideally you would want to use the entire history of draws for the state. The more data you have the better. I also use concepts I haven't ever seen in Statistics that I have developed myself.
"You need a knowledge of Probability and the hit frequency for whatever you're playing. It is helpful to know about relative or empirical frequency "