Does Lottery Software work?Prev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

Lottery software work

yes

[ 7 ]

[ 20.6% ]

[ 10 ]

[ 29.4% ]

Maybe

[ 4 ]

[ 11.8% ]

has helped me win

[ 4 ]

[ 11.8% ]

Won $1k

[ 1 ]

[ 2.9% ]

Won $100k

[ 2 ]

[ 5.9% ]

Won $1m

[ 1 ]

[ 2.9% ]

It stinks

[ 0 ]

[ 0.0% ]

I know nothing

[ 5 ]

[ 14.7% ]

Total valid votes

[ 34 ]

Discarded votes

[ 0 ]

Player649

Canada
Member #218,115
October 17, 2021
171 Posts
Offline

Oct 11, 2025, 6:51 pm

Quote: Originally posted by wander73 on Oct 8, 2025
what do you ask chat gpt?

This is the question that I asked Chat:

Inquiry: Testing lottery wheels

It was very generic. It can be versed in different way with more detail. The answer may be more detailed as well.
Player649

Canada
Member #218,115
October 17, 2021
171 Posts
Offline

Oct 11, 2025, 7:16 pm

Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on Oct 11, 2025
Most weeks I have a 0% ROI. But there are 2 reasons why I don't mind...

1. It was a total cost of $14 to play the entire week.

2. The occasional hit on pick 3 is enough to continue on house money for months!

While I can see the value of playing more tickets when they use all of the numbers, there is still no guarantee that they will group enough on the same ticket. If I played a wheel on those weeks I play the 6/49 PA Match 6 instead of just one combo, I would not be content with anything under 100+% ROI. At $14/wk it is no issue... I was wrong, I lost. I hit $1,000 on that game with only one ticket a few years ago... it was on one of the 2 QP lines they give with each play, so I was still wrong... but a hit is a hit.

My play is entirely driven by budget, it is the first part of any system I develop. At this budget level, randomness is most certainly a factor.

The strategy deployed for playing depends on goal. As specified earlier my goal is to minimize the cost of long term playing while maximizing chances of winning at the same time. Long term profit is not an objective because statistically it is not going to happen (short term profits are quite possible, thou). And if I make a profit in just one play (happened in June, July, August and now in October) I'm not going to stop to just celebrate the fact. The goal is long term.

If I had a budget of $14 per week this is what I would do:

- chip in another buck and play once in 2 weeks

- this methodology has win-to-play ratio of 70-80% (see previous post). You have a pretty good chance of winning something at any play interval.

Smaller wheels can be used as well. The smallest for 649 must have minimum 9 lines. I don't have such wheels and no idea about their performance.
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,509 Posts
Offline

Oct 12, 2025, 9:48 am

Quote: Originally posted by Player649 on Oct 11, 2025
The strategy deployed for playing depends on goal. As specified earlier my goal is to minimize the cost of long term playing while maximizing chances of winning at the same time. Long term profit is not an objective because statistically it is not going to happen (short term profits are quite possible, thou). And if I make a profit in just one play (happened in June, July, August and now in October) I'm not going to stop to just celebrate the fact. The goal is long term.

If I had a budget of $14 per week this is what I would do:

- chip in another buck and play once in 2 weeks

- this methodology has win-to-play ratio of 70-80% (see previous post). You have a pretty good chance of winning something at any play interval.

Smaller wheels can be used as well. The smallest for 649 must have minimum 9 lines. I don't have such wheels and no idea about their performance.

"I don't have such wheels and no idea about their performance"

Itza lotta thangz YOU obviously don't knoow bout Playa649 ...

Brock Lee

us
Member #231,828
May 4, 2023
1,635 Posts
Offline

Oct 12, 2025, 12:23 pm

Quote: Originally posted by JADELottery on Oct 5, 2025

Does Lottery Software work?
Yes	10	38.5%	███████████████████████████████████████
No	9	34.6%	███████████████████████████████████
I Don't Know	7	26.9%	███████████████████████████
Total valid votes	26

that is a much better organization of the answer choices. but the question itself is poorly phrased because "works" can be interpreted different ways. some might interpret "working" as performing basic mathematical tasks, and others might interpret it as giving them the winning combinations. most wheeling software works in the first sense: they do produce wheels. but playing wheels won't give you better odds of winning the jackpot. and most wheel players are losing money big time compared to casual players because they are playing too many lines.

pretty weird seeing this topic originating from wander of all people. he's spent the last two years trying to find the winning numbers from sports scores and a woman named "joann."

"don't believe everything you read on the internet." -- abraham lincoln

"abraham lincoln is a liar." -- william shakespeare

Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,509 Posts
Offline

Oct 12, 2025, 5:56 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Brock Lee on Oct 12, 2025
that is a much better organization of the answer choices. but the question itself is poorly phrased because "works" can be interpreted different ways. some might interpret "working" as performing basic mathematical tasks, and others might interpret it as giving them the winning combinations. most wheeling software works in the first sense: they do produce wheels. but playing wheels won't give you better odds of winning the jackpot. and most wheel players are losing money big time compared to casual players because they are playing too many lines.

pretty weird seeing this topic originating from wander of all people. he's spent the last two years trying to find the winning numbers from sports scores and a woman named "joann."

"but playing wheels won't give you better odds of winning the jackpot."

Whyyyy THAT'Z the most senzible thang You've eevaah posted on LP to date Green Hornet.

In fact, playing THE most Stat$ticstically viable numberz izz the ONLY way that improvez yo Oddz of winning.. .. It may even help ya to Shutdown a Game or two ...IF, ya uze dat Stat$cope properly...

It definitely shutdown dem Naysayerz & Hecklerz

-Stat$talker
JustMaybe

us
Member #228,334
January 2, 2023
1,493 Posts
Offline

Oct 12, 2025, 7:39 pm

I like the argument from hypersoniq that the lottery is memoryless.

It does not remember the past draws.

This is especially true of ball draws, not sure about computer generated draws.

The truth is if there was a system that worked, we would have jackpot winners almost every drawing or every other draw, but we don't, more so for the bigger jackpots, PB, MM and other larger State games like those in Texas and California.

I mostly play QPs, but once in a while I try to do my own abracadabra 🤣🤣🤣

Good luck to all regardless of how one plays.

I believe winning the lottery jackpot is a 💯 % factor of luck.

May Fortuna, goddess of chance or lot vindicate me.
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,509 Posts
Offline

Oct 13, 2025, 10:43 am

Quote: Originally posted by JustMaybe on Oct 12, 2025
I like the argument from hypersoniq that the lottery is memoryless.

It does not remember the past draws.

This is especially true of ball draws, not sure about computer generated draws.

The truth is if there was a system that worked, we would have jackpot winners almost every drawing or every other draw, but we don't, more so for the bigger jackpots, PB, MM and other larger State games like those in Texas and California.

I mostly play QPs, but once in a while I try to do my own abracadabra 🤣🤣🤣

Good luck to all regardless of how one plays.

"The truth is if there was a system that worked, we would have jackpot winners almost every drawing or every other draw"

Are YOU suure bout DAT?

9/3/21

If not every utha drawing,.. at least every BLUE SCREEN .. Rememba, Ole Stat$ STILL had correct numbaz even AFTA LOz halted the drawing

Probability Math duzn't lie

-Stat$talker
parlayman

50

bliss
United States
Member #176,314
July 31, 2016
26,506 Posts
Online

Oct 13, 2025, 10:55 am

I wrote a program that looks for patterns in Pick 3 numbers.

I would claim that it works well in one very specific way.

The program produces zero, one, or maybe two numbers.

This keeps me from playing ten, twenty, thirty or even fifty numbers per draw.

So it works great to help me keep my cash burn rate way down.

And if it ever kicks into gear and starts throwing winners, so much the better!

-p
Brock Lee

us
Member #231,828
May 4, 2023
1,635 Posts
Offline

Oct 13, 2025, 12:39 pm

Quote: Originally posted by parlayman on Oct 13, 2025
I wrote a program that looks for patterns in Pick 3 numbers.

I would claim that it works well in one very specific way.

The program produces zero, one, or maybe two numbers.

This keeps me from playing ten, twenty, thirty or even fifty numbers per draw.

So it works great to help me keep my cash burn rate way down.

And if it ever kicks into gear and starts throwing winners, so much the better!

smart dude.
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,509 Posts
Offline

Oct 13, 2025, 2:53 pm

Quote: Originally posted by parlayman on Oct 13, 2025
I wrote a program that looks for patterns in Pick 3 numbers.

I would claim that it works well in one very specific way.

The program produces zero, one, or maybe two numbers.

This keeps me from playing ten, twenty, thirty or even fifty numbers per draw.

So it works great to help me keep my cash burn rate way down.

And if it ever kicks into gear and starts throwing winners, so much the better!

"And if it ever kicks into gear"

Eevaah, could be a veery looong time ...like waitin on Texez 2 Stepper & CricketMan to hit their State Lottery...
Coin Toss

Zeta Reticuli Star System
United States
Member #30,469
January 17, 2006
12,515 Posts
Offline

Oct 14, 2025, 2:27 am

Truth be known people just want to believe there is a lottery software that works. File it in the 'if only' or 'once upon a time' file.

Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any. So many systems, so many theories, so few jackpot winners.

There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.
Stat$talker

700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
United States
Member #200,634
September 1, 2019
5,509 Posts
Offline

Oct 14, 2025, 6:36 am

Quote: Originally posted by Coin Toss on Oct 14, 2025
Truth be known people just want to believe there is a lottery software that works. File it in the 'if only' or 'once upon a time' file.

"people just want to believe there is a lottery software that works."

Aaaand, There izz ,..

" LOTTO PRO " & Probability Math ....
hypersoniq

Pennsylvania
United States
Member #1,340
April 6, 2003
2,940 Posts
Offline

Oct 14, 2025, 6:54 am

What exactly does Lotto Pro do?

I could not determine from the "buy me now" landing page full of sales pitches and questionable testimonials...

Have an EXCELlent day!

JADELottery

Eagle Sun

IA, MN, WI
United States
Member #21
December 7, 2001
5,177 Posts
Offline

Oct 14, 2025, 7:12 am

Quote: Originally posted by JADELottery on Sep 24, 2025

This should have been a: Yes, No or I Don't Know question.

Does Lottery Software work?
Yes	8	53.3%	█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
No	5	33.3%	█████████████████████████████████
I Don't Know	2	13.3%	█████████████
Total valid votes	15

As of 2025-10-14 06:12 CT

Does Lottery Software work?
Yes	13	40.6%	█████████████████████████████████████████
No	10	31.3%	████████████████████████████████
I Don't Know	9	28.1%	█████████████████████████████
Total valid votes	32

The One Over None
I Know...

ancient40

United States
Member #190,439
June 11, 2018
130 Posts
Offline

Oct 14, 2025, 7:13 am

It's seems no one is feeding the animals anymore. when He's all alone on an island by his self talking to his self and no one responds. how great is that. aka mr $hatzzz talker. month after month year after year and his still can explain probability.

{probability is NO guarantee} only your mounting losses will be Guaranteed

The gambler's fallacy is the belief that the probability for an outcome after a series of outcomes is not the same as the probability for a single outcome. The gambler's fallacy is real and true in cases where the events in question are independent and identically distributed.

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Does Lottery Software work?Prev TopicNext Topic

Does Lottery Software work?Prev Topic Next Topic